World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 39 5683 5277 409 393 187 6238

David Greenfield publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Greenfield between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Greenfield published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2017. 25 of the 220 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2017. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 18 publications 2016: 14 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 16 publications
2001 2025

220 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Greenfield: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 1
2006 2
2007 4
2008 3
2009 5
2010 12
2011 17
2012 20
2013 16
2014 12
2015 18
2016 14
2017 22
2018 14
2019 11
2020 7
2021 6
2022 6
2023 4
2024 9
2025 16
Total 220
Download as CSV

David Greenfield publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Greenfield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 187 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 187
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

David Greenfield D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Greenfield sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300 39
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

David Greenfield is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia. Their research spans multiple domains within health professions and medicine, with a focus on healthcare quality, management, and economic evaluations.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Health Professions
  • Medicine

Within these fields, their work particularly addresses subfields such as:

  • General Health Professions
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Health Information Management
  • Emergency Medicine
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

David Greenfield's research topics cover a range of issues around healthcare systems and outcomes, including:

  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Healthcare Quality and Management
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Disaster Response and Management

Their notable recent publications are:

  • Kindness, Listening, and Connection: Patient and Clinician Key Requirements for Emotional Support in Chronic and Complex Care, 2022, Journal of Patient Experience
  • Digital interventions self-management education for type 1 and 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
  • Impact of DSMES app interventions on medication adherence in type 2 diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, BMJ Health & Care Informatics
  • Exploring interdisciplinary teamwork to support effective ward rounds, 2020, International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance
  • rpavirtual: Key lessons in healthcare organisational resilience in the time of COVID-19, 2022, The International Journal of Health Planning and Management

Frequent co-authors collaborating with David Greenfield include:

  • Kathy Eljiz
  • Alison Derrett
  • Usman Iqbal
  • Kathy Dempsey
  • Susan Jain

The scholar frequently publishes in journals such as:

  • International Journal for Quality in Health Care
  • International Journal of Integrated Care
  • BMJ Health & Care Informatics
  • The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
  • Infection Disease & Health

Best Publications

  • Health sector accreditation research: a systematic review.

    David Greenfield;Jeffrey Braithwaite

  • How and where clinicians exercise power: interprofessional relations in health care

    Peter Nugus;David Greenfield;Joanne Travaglia;Johanna Westbrook

  • Barriers and enablers that influence sustainable interprofessional education: a literature review

    Tanya Rechael Lawlis;Judith Anson;David Greenfield

  • Nurses’ workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review

    Deborah S Debono;David Greenfield;Joanne F Travaglia;Janet C Long

  • Health service accreditation as a predictor of clinical and organisational performance: a blinded, random, stratified study

    Jeffrey Braithwaite;David Greenfield;Johanna Westbrook;Marjorie Pawsey

  • Narrative synthesis of health service accreditation literature

    Reece Hinchcliff;David Greenfield;Max Moldovan;Johanna Irene Westbrook

  • The standard of healthcare accreditation standards: a review of empirical research underpinning their development and impact

    David Greenfield;Marjorie Pawsey;Reece Hinchcliff;Max Moldovan

  • A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737].

    Jeffrey Braithwaite;Johanna Westbrook;Marjorie Pawsey;David Greenfield

  • Developing the evidence base for accreditation of healthcare organisations: a call for transparency and innovation

    David Greenfield;Jeffrey Braithwaite

  • What motivates professionals to engage in the accreditation of healthcare organizations

    David Greenfield;Marjorie Pawsey;Jeffrey Braithwaite

  • Health services accreditation: what is the evidence that the benefits justify the costs?

    Virginia Mumford;Kevin Forde;David Greenfield;Reece Hinchcliff

  • What influences patient decision-making in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis multidisciplinary care? A study of patient perspectives

    Anne Vaughan Hogden;David Greenfield;Peter Nugus;Matthew C. Kiernan

  • Stakeholder perspectives on implementing accreditation programs: a qualitative study of enabling factors

    Reece Hinchcliff;David Greenfield;Johanna I Westbrook;Marjorie Pawsey

  • Applying the Theoretical Domains Framework to identify barriers and targeted interventions to enhance nurses’ use of electronic medication management systems in two Australian hospitals

    Deborah Debono;Deborah Debono;Natalie Taylor;Wendy Lipworth;David Greenfield;David Greenfield

  • Setting priorities in child health research investments for South Africa.

    Mark Tomlinson;Mickey Chopra;David Sanders;Debbie Bradshaw

  • A four-year, systems-wide intervention promoting interprofessional collaboration

    Jeffrey Braithwaite;Mary Westbrook;Peter Nugus;David Greenfield

  • The enactment of dynamic leadership.

    David Greenfield

  • Determining requirements for patient-centred care: a participatory concept mapping study.

    Kathryn Ogden;Jennifer Barr;David Greenfield

  • Continuing differences between health professions' attitudes: the saga of accomplishing systems-wide interprofessionalism

    Jeffrey Braithwaite;Mary Westbrook;Peter Nugus;David Greenfield

  • Comparison of health service accreditation programs in low- and middle-income countries with those in higher income countries: a cross-sectional study

    Jeffrey Braithwaite;Charles D. Shaw;Max Moldovan;David Greenfield

  • A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737] | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository

    Jeffrey Braithwaite;Johanna Westbrook;Sally Nathan;Robert Gibberd

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey Braithwaite
Jeffrey Braithwaite Macquarie University
Johanna I. Westbrook
Johanna I. Westbrook Macquarie University
Matthew C. Kiernan
Matthew C. Kiernan Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Keith Townsend
Keith Townsend Griffith University
Adrian John Wilkinson
Adrian John Wilkinson Griffith University
Andrew Georgiou
Andrew Georgiou Macquarie University
Ken Hillman
Ken Hillman University of New South Wales
Timothy M. Devinney
Timothy M. Devinney University of Manchester
Rick Iedema
Rick Iedema King's College London
John Øvretveit
John Øvretveit Karolinska Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education has opened up new possibilities for students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities careers. Today, there are many reputable programs available that can fit a variety of schedules, career goals, and budgets. For those seeking advanced clinical roles, psyd online degrees prepare graduates for licensure as psychologists with a focus on practical training.

If your interest lies in marriage and family therapy, exploring mft accredited programs can help you meet professional requirements while studying from anywhere. Those looking for flexibility coupled with affordability should review the best online masters in psychology, which offer multiple specialization tracks and are well-suited for those balancing work and study.

For educators and administrators targeting higher-level leadership roles, accelerated 2 year ed.d programs online provide a fast-track to senior positions in academia or policy. Exploring these diverse options can help you map out a successful career pathway in the social sciences or humanities.

Best Scientists Citing David Greenfield

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles