World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
43818
World Ranking
7885
National Ranking
772

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
101
Citations
42912
World Ranking
85
National Ranking
11

Scott Reeves publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Reeves sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 431 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Scott Reeves D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Reeves sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott Reeves was affiliated with St George's, University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily contributed to the field of Health Professions, with a focus on areas such as General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services, Emergency Medicine, Sociology and Political Science, and Philosophy.

Their scholarly output encompassed a range of topics, including:

  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
  • Healthcare Operations and Scheduling Optimization
  • Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Global Health Workforce Issues
  • Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity

Among recent publications were studies addressing diverse aspects of healthcare and interprofessional relations. Notable papers include:

  • "Impact of Surgical Table Orientation on Flow Disruptions and Movement Patterns during Pediatric Outpatient Surgeries," published in 2021 in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • "An interprofessional international research collaboration: exploration of key opportunities and challenges," published in 2020 in the Journal of Interprofessional Care
  • "Proactive Evaluation of an Operating Room Prototype: A Simulation-Based Modeling Approach," published in 2021 in PubMed
  • "Application of an adapted relationship scale for assessing the occurrence of six different relationships as perceived by seven health care professions in Northern Italy," published in 2020 in the Journal of Interprofessional Care
  • "Nurse-Physician Relationship Scale--Adapted Version," published in 2021 in the PsycTESTS Dataset

Scott Reeves frequently collaborated with several researchers who appeared multiple times as coauthors. These included Anjali Joseph, Kevin Taaffe, David B. Allison, Maria Mischo-Kelling, and Heike Wieser.

Their work was published mainly in venues such as the Journal of Interprofessional Care, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, PubMed, PsycTESTS Dataset, and Poster presentations.

Best Publications

  • Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update)

    Scott Reeves;Laure Perrier;Joanne Goldman;Della Freeth

  • Interprofessional collaboration: effects of practice-based interventions on professional practice and healthcare outcomes.

    Merrick Zwarenstein;Joanne Goldman;Scott Reeves

  • Guidelines for performing a comprehensive transesophageal echocardiographic examination: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists.

    Rebecca T. Hahn;Theodore Abraham;Mark S. Adams;Charles J. Bruce

  • A best evidence systematic review of interprofessional education: BEME Guide no. 9

    M. Hammick;D. Freeth;I. Koppel;S. Reeves

  • Qualitative research methodologies: ethnography.

    Scott Reeves;Ayelet Kuper;Brian David Hodges

  • Interprofessional collaboration to improve professional practice and healthcare outcomes

    Scott Reeves;Ferruccio Pelone;Reema Harrison;Joanne Goldman

  • A BEME systematic review of the effects of interprofessional education: BEME Guide No. 39

    Scott Reeves;Simon Fletcher;Hugh Barr;Ivan Birch

  • Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care

    Scott Reeves

  • Practice guidelines for perioperative transesophageal echocardiography

    Daniel M. Thys;Martin D. Abel;Robert F. Brooker;Michael K. Cahalan

  • Effective Interprofessional Education: Argument, Assumption, And Evidence

    Hugh Barr;Ivan Koppel;Scott Reeves;Marilyn Hammick

  • Why use theories in qualitative research

    Scott Reeves;Mathieu Albert;Ayelet Kuper;Brian David Hodges

  • An introduction to reading and appraising qualitative research

    Ayelet Kuper;Scott Reeves;Wendy Levinson

  • Key elements for interprofessional education. Part 1: The learner, the educator and the learning context

    Ivy Oandasan;Scott Reeves

  • Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care: Reeves/Interprofessional Teamwork for Health and Social Care

    Scott Reeves;Simon Lewin;Sherry Espin;Merrick Zwarenstein

  • An efficient and accurate new method for locating the F3 position for prefrontal TMS applications

    William Beam;Jeffrey J. Borckardt;Scott T. Reeves;Mark S. George

  • Effective interprofessional education : development, delivery and evaluation

    Della Freeth;Marilyn Hammick;Scott Reeves;Ivan Koppel

  • Guidelines for performing ultrasound guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists

    Christopher A. Troianos;Gregg S. Hartman;Kathryn E. Glas;Nikolaos J. Skubas

  • Measuring the impact of interprofessional education on collaborative practice and patient outcomes.

    Malcolm Cox;Patricia Cuff;Barbara Brandt;Scott Reeves

  • The effectiveness of interprofessional education: Key findings from a new systematic review

    Scott Reeves;Merrick Zwarenstein;Joanne Goldman;Hugh Barr

  • Relationships of power: implications for interprofessional education

    Lindsay Baker;Eileen Egan-Lee;Maria Athina Tina Martimianakis;Scott Reeves

Frequent Co-Authors

Merrick Zwarenstein
Merrick Zwarenstein University of Western Ontario
Mark S. George
Mark S. George Medical University of South Carolina
Francis G. Spinale
Francis G. Spinale University of South Carolina
Jeffrey J. Borckardt
Jeffrey J. Borckardt Medical University of South Carolina
Simon Lewin
Simon Lewin South African Medical Research Council
Brian Hodges
Brian Hodges University Health Network
Ayelet Kuper
Ayelet Kuper University of Toronto
Lorelei Lingard
Lorelei Lingard University of Western Ontario
Ziad Nahas
Ziad Nahas University of Minnesota
Joan Sargeant
Joan Sargeant Dalhousie University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The demand for flexible, high-quality online education in Social Sciences and Humanities is growing. Many students are seeking programs that allow them to balance work or family commitments while advancing their academic and professional goals.

One popular pathway is a masters in psychology online, which prepares graduates for roles in counseling, research, and organizational leadership. For those looking to fast-track their studies, an accelerated bachelor's degree can provide a faster entry into fields like sociology, communications, or political science.

Educators and administrators may consider the easiest edd programs to quickly gain leadership skills and further their careers in education. Alternatively, a general online masters degree in various disciplines offers a flexible pathway to specialized knowledge and advancement.

Online degrees open doors to diverse career pathways, including education, government, nonprofit, research, and business settings. When choosing a program, consider your career objectives, accreditation, and the flexibility each option offers.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Reeves

Recently Published Articles