World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
14773
World Ranking
4125
National Ranking
1873

Abhishek Datta publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abhishek Datta sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 183 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Abhishek Datta D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Abhishek Datta sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Abhishek Datta is affiliated with the City College of New York in the United States and specializes in research primarily within neuroscience and medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields such as neurology, cognitive neuroscience, biomedical engineering, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and cellular and molecular neuroscience.

Their research addresses a broad array of topics, including transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, neuroscience and neural engineering, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, vestibular and auditory disorders, muscle activation and electromyography studies, pain management and treatment, and functional brain connectivity studies.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Marom Bikson, Leigh Charvet, Alexander Guillen, Chris Thomas, and Dennis Q. Truong, demonstrating collaboration with experts across related domains.

They have contributed extensively to several publication venues, most notably:

  • Brain stimulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Frontiers in Pain Research
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Abhishek Datta are:

  • "Selective inhibition of TGFβ1 activation overcomes primary resistance to checkpoint blockade therapy by altering tumor immune landscape" (2020, Science Translational Medicine)
  • "Exposure to gamma tACS in Alzheimer's disease: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled, crossover, pilot study" (2021, Brain stimulation)
  • "Increasing Brain Gamma Activity Improves Episodic Memory and Restores Cholinergic Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease" (2022, Annals of Neurology)
  • "Tolerability and feasibility of at-home remotely supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS): Single-center evidence from 6,779 sessions" (2022, Brain stimulation)
  • "Optimization of interferential stimulation of the human brain with electrode arrays" (2020, Journal of Neural Engineering)

Best Publications

  • Gyri-precise head model of transcranial direct current stimulation: Improved spatial focality using a ring electrode versus conventional rectangular pad

    Abhishek Datta;Varun Bansal;Julian Diaz;Jinal Patel

  • Comparing cortical plasticity induced by conventional and high-definition 4 × 1 ring tDCS: a neurophysiological study.

    Hsiao-I. Kuo;Marom Bikson;Abhishek Datta;Preet Minhas

  • Optimized multi-electrode stimulation increases focality and intensity at target.

    Jacek P Dmochowski;Abhishek Datta;Marom Bikson;Yuzhuo Su

  • Cellular effects of acute direct current stimulation: somatic and synaptic terminal effects

    Asif Rahman;Davide Reato;Mattia Arlotti;Fernando Gasca

  • Inter-Individual Variation during Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Normalization of Dose Using MRI-Derived Computational Models.

    Abhishek Datta;Dennis Truong;Preet Minhas;Lucas C. Parra

  • Physiological and modeling evidence for focal transcranial electrical brain stimulation in humans: A basis for high-definition tDCS

    Dylan Edwards;Mar Cortes;Abhishek Datta;Preet Minhas

  • Establishing safety limits for transcranial direct current stimulation

    Marom Bikson;Abhishek Datta;Maged Elwassif

  • Transcranial current stimulation focality using disc and ring electrode configurations: FEM analysis.

    Abhishek Datta;Maged Elwassif;Fortunato Battaglia;Marom Bikson

  • Individualized model predicts brain current flow during transcranial direct-current stimulation treatment in responsive stroke patient

    Abhishek Datta;Julie M. Baker;Marom Bikson;Julius Fridriksson

  • tDCS-induced analgesia and electrical fields in pain-related neural networks in chronic migraine.

    Alexandre F. DaSilva;Mariana E. Mendonca;Soroush Zaghi;Mariana Lopes

  • Realistic volumetric-approach to simulate transcranial electric stimulation—ROAST—a fully automated open-source pipeline

    Yu Huang;Abhishek Datta;Marom Bikson;Lucas C Parra

  • Electrode montages for tDCS and weak transcranial electrical stimulation: role of "return" electrode's position and size.

    Marom Bikson;Abhishek Datta;Asif Rahman;Jen Scaturro

  • Regulatory considerations for the clinical and research use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): Review and recommendations from an expert panel

    F. Fregni;M. A. Nitsche;C. K. Loo;A. R. Brunoni

  • Computational Models of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

    Marom Bikson;Asif Rahman;Abhishek Datta;Abhishek Datta

  • A Pilot Study of the Tolerability and Effects of High-Definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (HD-tDCS) on Pain Perception

    Jeffrey J. Borckardt;Marom Bikson;Heather Frohman;Scott T. Reeves

  • Electrodes for high-definition transcutaneous DC stimulation for applications in drug-delivery and electrotherapy, including tDCS

    Preet Minhas;Varun Bansal;Jinal Patel;Johnson S. Ho

  • Technique and considerations in the use of 4x1 ring high-definition transcranial direct current stimulation (HD-tDCS).

    Mauricio F. Villamar;Magdalena Sarah Volz;Magdalena Sarah Volz;Marom Bikson;Abhishek Datta;Abhishek Datta

  • Noninvasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use

    Evangelia G. Chrysikou;Roy H. Hamilton;H. Branch Coslett;Abhishek Datta

  • Transcranial direct current stimulation in patients with skull defects and skull plates: high-resolution computational FEM study of factors altering cortical current flow.

    Abhishek Datta;Marom Bikson;Felipe Fregni;Felipe Fregni

  • Transcranial DC stimulation in fibromyalgia: optimized cortical target supported by high-resolution computational models.

    Mariana E. Mendonca;Marcus B. Santana;Abrahão Fontes Baptista;Abhishek Datta

Frequent Co-Authors

Marom Bikson
Marom Bikson City College of New York
Lucas C. Parra
Lucas C. Parra City College of New York
Felipe Fregni
Felipe Fregni Harvard University
Adam J. Woods
Adam J. Woods The University of Texas at Dallas
Barbara Borroni
Barbara Borroni University of Brescia
Fortunato Battaglia
Fortunato Battaglia Seton Hall University
Roy H. Hamilton
Roy H. Hamilton University of Pennsylvania
Julius Fridriksson
Julius Fridriksson University of South Carolina
Colleen Loo
Colleen Loo University of New South Wales
H. Branch Coslett
H. Branch Coslett University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Abhishek Datta

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles