World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
40
Citations
8040
World Ranking
8019
National Ranking
3447

Alexander Opitz publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Opitz sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 110 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Alexander Opitz D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander Opitz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Alexander Opitz is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, with a total of 192 publications in this field. Within neuroscience, Opitz has contributed extensively to subfields such as cognitive neuroscience, neurology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, and electrical and electronic engineering.

Opitz's work covers several key topics including:

  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

They have published frequently in notable scientific venues, such as:

  • Brain Stimulation (36 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (21 publications)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (5 publications)
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (4 publications)
  • Journal of Neural Engineering (3 publications)

Among Opitz's recent papers are:

  • Dose-dependent effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on spike timing in awake nonhuman primates (2020, Science Advances)
  • Neurocognitive, physiological, and biophysical effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation (2022, Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
  • The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability (2022, Brain Stimulation)
  • Identifying regions in prefrontal cortex related to working memory improvement: A novel meta-analytic method using electric field modeling (2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Experimental evaluation of methods for real-time EEG phase-specific transcranial magnetic stimulation (2020, Journal of Neural Engineering)

Frequent collaborators of Opitz include:

  • Ivan Alekseichuk (47 joint publications)
  • Sina Shirinpour (44 joint publications)
  • Miles Wischnewski (40 joint publications)
  • Harry Tran (16 joint publications)
  • Taylor Berger (14 joint publications)

Best Publications

  • Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates the activity of primary somatosensory cortex in humans

    Wynn Legon;Tomokazu F. Sato;Alexander Opitz;Jerel K Mueller

  • Determinants of the electric field during transcranial direct current stimulation

    Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Walter Paulus;Susanne Will;Andre Antunes

  • Immediate neurophysiological effects of transcranial electrical stimulation.

    Anli Liu;Mihály Vöröslakos;Gregory Kronberg;Simon Henin

  • Electric field calculations in brain stimulation based on finite elements: an optimized processing pipeline for the generation and usage of accurate individual head models.

    Mirko Windhoff;Alexander Opitz;Axel Thielscher

  • Impact of the gyral geometry on the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Axel Thielscher;Alexander Opitz;Mirko Windhoff

  • How the brain tissue shapes the electric field induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Alexander Opitz;Mirko Windhoff;Robin M. Heidemann;Robert Turner

  • Spatiotemporal structure of intracranial electric fields induced by transcranial electric stimulation in humans and nonhuman primates.

    Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Arnaud Falchier;Chao Gan Yan;Chao Gan Yan;Erin M. Yeagle

  • TDCS increases cortical excitability: direct evidence from TMS-EEG.

    Leonor J. Romero Lauro;Mario Rosanova;Giulia Mattavelli;Silvia Convento

  • Physiological observations validate finite element models for estimating subject-specific electric field distributions induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex.

    Alexander Opitz;Wynn Legon;Abby Rowlands;Warren K. Bickel

  • Dose-dependent effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation on spike timing in awake nonhuman primates.

    Luke Johnson;Ivan Alekseichuk;Jordan Krieg;Alex Doyle

  • Transcranial focused ultrasound modulates intrinsic and evoked EEG dynamics.

    Jerel K Mueller;Wynn Legon;Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Tomokazu F. Sato

  • Neurocognitive, physiological, and biophysical effects of transcranial alternating current stimulation

    Unknown

  • Repetitive magnetic stimulation induces plasticity of inhibitory synapses

    Maximilian Lenz;Christos Galanis;Florian Müller-Dahlhaus;Alexander Opitz

  • The precision of value-based choices depends causally on fronto-parietal phase coupling.

    Rafael Polanía;Marius Moisa;Marius Moisa;Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Marcus Grueschow

  • Brain state and polarity dependent modulation of brain networks by transcranial direct current stimulation

    Lucia M. Li;Ines R. Violante;Ines R. Violante;Ines R. Violante;Rob Leech;Ewan Ross

  • Wearable transdermal electrical stimulation devices and methods of using them

    Isy Goldwasser;William J. Tyler;Alexander Opitz;Tomokazu Sato

  • Comparative modeling of transcranial magnetic and electric stimulation in mouse, monkey, and human

    Ivan Alekseichuk;Kathleen Mantell;Sina Shirinpour;Alexander Opitz

  • The phase of sensorimotor mu and beta oscillations has the opposite effect on corticospinal excitability

    Unknown

  • Pulsed Ultrasound Differentially Stimulates Somatosensory Circuits in Humans as Indicated by EEG and fMRI

    Wynn Legon;Abby Rowlands;Alexander Opitz;Tomokazu F. Sato

  • An integrated framework for targeting functional networks via transcranial magnetic stimulation.

    Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Michael D. Fox;Michael D. Fox;R. Cameron Craddock;R. Cameron Craddock;Stanley J. Colcombe

  • Impact of transcranial direct current stimulation on fatigue in multiple sclerosis

    Catarina Saiote;Thomas Goldschmidt;Charles Timäus;Martijn D. Steenwijk

  • On the importance of precise electrode placement for targeted transcranial electric stimulation.

    Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Alexander Opitz;Erin Yeagle;Axel Thielscher;Charles E. Schroeder

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael P. Milham
Michael P. Milham Child Mind Institute
Axel Thielscher
Axel Thielscher Technical University of Denmark
Charles E. Schroeder
Charles E. Schroeder Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Walter Paulus
Walter Paulus University of Göttingen
R. Cameron Craddock
R. Cameron Craddock Facebook (United States)
Ting Xu
Ting Xu University of California, Davis
Andrea Antal
Andrea Antal University of Göttingen
William J. Tyler
William J. Tyler University of Alabama at Birmingham
Andreas Vlachos
Andreas Vlachos University of Freiburg
Adam Hampshire
Adam Hampshire Imperial College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Alexander Opitz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles