World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 38 6610 6128 2329 2066 115 4547

Jay F. Shriver publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jay F. Shriver between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jay F. Shriver published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2017. 20 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2017. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 9 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 8 publications
1991 2025

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jay F. Shriver: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 0
1999 4
2000 2
2001 5
2002 5
2003 5
2004 0
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 8
2009 4
2010 7
2011 3
2012 10
2013 5
2014 5
2015 8
2016 12
2017 13
2018 5
2019 5
2020 10
2021 9
2022 13
2023 6
2024 12
2025 8
Total 173
Download as CSV

Jay F. Shriver publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay F. Shriver sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 108–117 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 115 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484 115
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Jay F. Shriver D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jay F. Shriver sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344 38
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jay F. Shriver is affiliated with the United States Naval Research Laboratory in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a specialized concentration in Oceanography, which encompasses 57 of their publications. They have also contributed to subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Environmental Chemistry, and General Health Professions.

The core topics addressed in their work involve Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, Climate Variability and Models, Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing, Marine and Coastal Ecosystems, Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, and Arctic and Antarctic Ice Dynamics.

Jay F. Shriver has participated in numerous publications across various scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Ocean Modelling
  • Ocean science
  • Earth and Space Science

Some of their recent papers highlight a range of connected oceanographic and atmospheric themes:

  • On the interplay between horizontal resolution and wave drag and their effect on tidal baroclinic mode waves in realistic global ocean simulations, 2020, Ocean Modelling
  • The Navy's Earth System Prediction Capability: A New Global Coupled Atmosphere-Ocean-Sea Ice Prediction System Designed for Daily to Subseasonal Forecasting, 2020, Earth and Space Science
  • Accuracy assessment of global internal-tide models using satellite altimetry, 2021, Ocean science
  • Near-Surface Oceanic Kinetic Energy Distributions From Drifter Observations and Numerical Models, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Near-Inertial Wave Energetics Modulated by Background Flows in a Global Model Simulation, 2022, Journal of Physical Oceanography

Collaboration is a significant aspect of their research, with frequent co-authors including Brian K. Arbic, Maarten C. Buijsman, Roy Barkan, Alan J. Wallcraft, and Oladeji Q. Siyanbola.

Best Publications

  • Accuracy assessment of global barotropic ocean tide models

    D. Stammer;R. D. Ray;Ole Baltazar Andersen;B. K. Arbic

  • Altimetry for the future: building on 25 years of progress

    Saleh Abdalla;Abdolnabi Abdeh Kolahchi;Michaël Ablain;Susheel Adusumilli

  • An evaluation of the barotropic and internal tides in a high‐resolution global ocean circulation model

    J. F. Shriver;Brian K. Arbic;J. G. Richman;R. D. Ray

  • The Dynamics of the East Australian Current System: The Tasman Front, the East Auckland Current, and the East Cape Current

    Charles E. Tilburg;Harley E. Hurlburt;James J. O'Brien;Jay F. Shriver

  • Global Modeling of Internal Tides Within an Eddying Ocean General Circulation Model

    Brian K Arbic;James G Richman;Jay F Shriver;Patrick G Timko

  • A Primer on Global Internal Tide and Internal Gravity Wave Continuum Modeling in HYCOM and MITgcm

    Brian K. Arbic;Matthew H. Alford;Joseph K. Ansong;Maarten C. Buijsman

  • Inferring dynamics from the wavenumber spectra of an eddying global ocean model with embedded tides

    James G. Richman;Brian K. Arbic;Jay F. Shriver;E. Joseph Metzger

  • Navy Real-time Global Modeling Systems

    Robert C. Rhodes;Harley E. Hurlburt;Alan J. Wallcraft;Charlie N. Barron

  • Spectral decomposition of internal gravity wave sea surface height in global models

    Anna C. Savage;Brian K. Arbic;Matthew H. Alford;Joseph K. Ansong

  • On Eddy Viscosity, Energy Cascades, and the Horizontal Resolution of Gridded Satellite Altimeter Products*

    Brian K. Arbic;Kurt L. Polzin;Robert B. Scott;James G. Richman

  • Simulated and observed circulation in the Indonesian Seas: 1/12° global HYCOM and the INSTANT observations

    E.J. Metzger;H.E. Hurlburt;X. Xu;Jay F. Shriver

  • An operational Eddy resolving 1/16° global ocean nowcast/forecast system

    Ole Martin Smedstad;Harley E. Hurlburt;E.Joseph Metzger;Robert C. Rhodes

  • Frequency content of sea surface height variability from internal gravity waves to mesoscale eddies

    Anna C. Savage;Brian K. Arbic;James G. Richman;Jay F. Shriver

  • Impact of Parameterized Internal Wave Drag on the Semidiurnal Energy Balance in a Global Ocean Circulation Model

    Maarten C. Buijsman;Joseph K. Ansong;Brian K. Arbic;James G. Richman

  • Geostrophic Turbulence in the Frequency–Wavenumber Domain: Eddy-Driven Low-Frequency Variability*

    Brian K. Arbic;Malte Müller;James G. Richman;Jay F. Shriver

  • Mesoscale variability in the boundary currents of the Alaska Gyre

    Stephen R. Okkonen;Gregg A. Jacobs;E. Joseph Metzger;Harley E. Hurlburt

  • Estimates of bottom flows and bottom boundary layer dissipation of the oceanic general circulation from global high-resolution models

    Brian K. Arbic;Jay F. Shriver;Patrick J. Hogan;Harley E. Hurlburt

  • The contribution of the global thermohaline circulation to the Pacific to Indian Ocean Throughflow via Indonesia

    Jay F. Shriver;Harley E. Hurlburt

  • How stationary are the internal tides in a high-resolution global ocean circulation model?

    Jay F. Shriver;James G. Richman;Brian K. Arbic

  • Effects of stencil width on surface ocean geostrophic velocity and vorticity estimation from gridded satellite altimeter data

    Brian K. Arbic;Robert B. Scott;Dudley B. Chelton;James G. Richman

  • Semidiurnal internal tide incoherence in the equatorial Pacific

    Maarten C. Buijsman;Brian K. Arbic;James G. Richman;Jay F. Shriver

  • Nonlinear Cascades of Surface Oceanic Geostrophic Kinetic Energy in the Frequency Domain

    Brian K. Arbic;Robert B. Scott;Glenn Richard Flierl;Andrew J. Morten

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian K. Arbic
Brian K. Arbic University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Harley E. Hurlburt
Harley E. Hurlburt United States Naval Research Laboratory
Maarten C. Buijsman
Maarten C. Buijsman University of Southern Mississippi
Alan J. Wallcraft
Alan J. Wallcraft United States Naval Research Laboratory
E. Joseph Metzger
E. Joseph Metzger United States Naval Research Laboratory
Eric P. Chassignet
Eric P. Chassignet Florida State University
Patrick J. Hogan
Patrick J. Hogan United States Naval Research Laboratory
Matthew H. Alford
Matthew H. Alford University of California, San Diego
Dimitris Menemenlis
Dimitris Menemenlis California Institute of Technology
Richard D. Ray
Richard D. Ray Goddard Space Flight Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens up diverse career options, many of which can be complemented by additional online degrees. For those interested in leadership and organizational roles, pursuing a masters degree in human resource management online can provide valuable skills in managing teams and projects effectively.

Online education is also highly accessible for learners at different life stages. Seniors looking to expand their knowledge or pivot careers may find specialized support and tailored programs by reviewing options for online degrees for seniors, making lifelong learning more attainable.

For those interested in research, data management, or educational roles within Earth Science, obtaining a degree from ala accredited schools ensures quality and recognition in the field of library and information science.

Understanding whether is a masters in library science worth it can be crucial before committing, as this degree complements Earth Science careers that rely on information curation and accessibility. Together, these pathways highlight the importance of versatile education options alongside core Earth Science studies.

Best Scientists Citing Jay F. Shriver

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles