World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
71
Citations
33349
World Ranking
712
National Ranking
22

Mareike Kunter publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mareike Kunter sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 198 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Mareike Kunter D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mareike Kunter sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mareike Kunter is affiliated with Goethe University Frankfurt in Germany, focusing primarily on research within Social Sciences and Psychology. Their work is concentrated in several subfields, notably Education, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Clinical Psychology.

Their research addresses various topics with particular emphasis on Teacher Professional Development and Motivation, Teacher Education and Leadership Studies, and Education Methods and Technologies. Additional areas of interest include Sociology and Education Studies, Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports, Early Childhood Education and Development, and Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion.

The scientist has published extensively in several academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Frontiers in Education
  • Teaching and Teacher Education
  • Unterrichtswissenschaft
  • Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie
  • British Journal of Educational Psychology

Mareike Kunter has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Franziska Baier-Mosch
  • Charlotte Dignath
  • Lukas Begrich
  • Benjamin Fauth
  • Thamar Voss

Recent papers authored by or involving Mareike Kunter cover diverse aspects of educational psychology and teacher development. Notable publications include:

  • "Teachers' Beliefs About Inclusive Education and Insights on What Contributes to Those Beliefs: a Meta-analytical Study," 2022, Educational Psychology Review
  • "Die Bedeutung des pädagogisch-psychologischen Wissens von angehenden Lehrkräften für die Unterrichtsqualität," 2020, peDOCS
  • "Ready to teach? A profile analysis of cognitive and motivational-affective teacher characteristics at the end of pre-service teacher education and the long-term effects on occupational well-being," 2021, Teaching and Teacher Education
  • "Construction and validation of a test to assess (pre-service) teachers' technological pedagogical knowledge (TPK)," 2020, Studies In Educational Evaluation
  • "Bildungswissenschaftliches Wissen und der Erwerb professioneller Kompetenz in der Lehramtsausbildung. Eine Kurzdarstellung des BilWiss-Projekts," 2020, peDOCS

Their research output includes a balanced mix of meta-analytical studies, empirical investigations, and instrument construction to assess educational competencies. This demonstrates a comprehensive approach to understanding factors influencing teacher quality, professional knowledge, and occupational well-being in educational contexts.

Best Publications

  • Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften

    Jürgen Baumert;Mareike Kunter

  • Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge, Cognitive Activation in the Classroom, and Student Progress:

    Jürgen Baumert;Mareike Kunter;Werner Blum;Martin Brunner

  • Professional Competence of Teachers: Effects on Instructional Quality and Student Development

    Mareike Kunter;Uta Klusmann;Jürgen Baumert;Dirk Richter

  • Stichwort : Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften

    Jürgen Baumert;Mareike Kunter

  • Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften : Ergebnisse des Forschungsprogramms COACTIV

    Mareike Kunter;Jürgen Baumert;Werner Blum;Uta Klusmann

  • How teachers’ self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis.

    Doris Holzberger;Anja Philipp;Mareike Kunter

  • Motivations for choosing teaching as a career : An international comparison using the FIT-Choice scale

    Helen Margaret Gilchrist Watt;Paul William Richardson;Uta Klusmann;Mareike Kunter

  • Teachers’ Content Knowledge and Pedagogical Content Knowledge The Role of Structural Differences in Teacher Education

    Thilo Kleickmann;Dirk Richter;Mareike Kunter;Jürgen Elsner

  • Das Kompetenzmodell von COACTIV

    Jürgen Baumert;Mareike Kunter

  • Pedagogical Content Knowledge and Content Knowledge of Secondary Mathematics Teachers.

    Stefan Krauss;Martin Brunner;Mareike Kunter;Jürgen Baumert

  • Professional Development Across the Teaching Career: Teachers’ Uptake of Formal and Informal Learning Opportunities

    Dirk Richter;Mareike Kunter;Uta Klusmann;Oliver Lüdtke

  • Teachers' occupational well-being and quality of instruction: The important role of self-regulatory patterns

    Uta Klusmann;Mareike Kunter;Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke

  • Students' and mathematics teachers' perceptions of teacher enthusiasm and instruction

    Mareike Kunter;Yi-Miau Tsai;Uta Klusmann;Martin Brunner

  • Assessing the impact of learning environments: How to use student ratings of classroom or school characteristics in multilevel modeling

    Oliver Lüdtke;Alexander Robitzsch;Ulrich Trautwein;Mareike Kunter

  • What makes lessons interesting?: The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects

    Yi-Miau Tsai;Mareike Kunter;Oliver Ludtke;Ulrich Trautwein

  • Effective Classroom Management and the Development of Subject-Related Interest.

    Mareike Kunter;Jürgen Baumert;Olaf Köller

  • Self-efficacy in classroom management, classroom disturbances, and emotional exhaustion: A moderated mediation analysis of teacher candidates.

    Theresa Dicke;Phillip David Parker;Herbert Warren Marsh;Mareike Kunter

  • Who is the expert? Construct and criteria validity of student and teacher ratings of instruction

    Mareike Kunter;Jürgen Baumert

  • The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality

    Benjamin Fauth;Jasmin Decristan;Anna-Theresia Decker;Gerhard Büttner

  • Assessing Teacher Candidates' General Pedagogical/Psychological Knowledge: Test Construction and Validation.

    Thamar Voss;Mareike Kunter;Jürgen Baumert

  • How different mentoring approaches affect beginning teachers' development in the first years of practice

    Dirk Richter;Dirk Richter;Mareike Kunter;Mareike Kunter;Oliver Lüdtke;Uta Klusmann;Uta Klusmann

  • The COACTIV Model of Teachers’ Professional Competence

    Jürgen Baumert;Mareike Kunter

  • Engagement and emotional exhaustion in teachers: Does the school context make a difference?

    Uta Klusmann;Mareike Kunter;Ulrich Trautwein;Oliver Lüdtke

  • PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT ACROSS THE TEACHING CAREER: TEACHERS' UPTAKE OF FORMAL AND INFORMAL LEARNING

    Dirk Richter;Mareike Kunter;Uta Klusmann;Oliver Lüdtke

Frequent Co-Authors

Oliver Lüdtke
Oliver Lüdtke Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education
Ulrich Trautwein
Ulrich Trautwein University of Tübingen
Dirk Richter
Dirk Richter University of Potsdam
Detlev Leutner
Detlev Leutner University of Duisburg-Essen
Eckhard Klieme
Eckhard Klieme Leibniz Association
Tina Seidel
Tina Seidel Technical University of Munich
Olaf Köller
Olaf Köller Leibniz Association
Jens Möller
Jens Möller Kiel University
Richard M. Ryan
Richard M. Ryan Australian Catholic University
Wolfgang Schneider
Wolfgang Schneider University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options. Many students opt for a master degree online to boost their credentials in a flexible, efficient way. These programs are designed to fit busy schedules, making graduate studies more accessible than ever.

For those looking to earn a bachelor’s degree quickly, accelerated bachelor degree programs allow students to complete coursework at a faster pace. These programs are ideal for motivated learners eager to enter the workforce sooner.

Affordability is a major concern for many prospective students. Options like cheapest online msw programs provide pathways to careers in social work without heavy financial burdens. Similarly, those interested in behavioral analysis can consider bcba accredited programs online to gain specialized skills at reasonable costs.

These online degree pathways create diverse career opportunities, from counseling and education to research and public service—all while offering flexibility and affordability.

Best Scientists Citing Mareike Kunter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles