World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Eckhard Klieme

Eckhard Klieme

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
69
Citations
23550
World Ranking
801
National Ranking
25

Eckhard Klieme publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eckhard Klieme sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 285 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Eckhard Klieme D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eckhard Klieme sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Eckhard Klieme is affiliated with the Leibniz Association in Germany. Their research primarily falls within the Social Sciences, with an emphasis on Education, Sociology and Political Science, Language and Linguistics, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Religious studies. The predominant subfield of study is Education, encompassing a broad range of topics related to teaching quality and educational outcomes.

The main topics addressed in their research include Sociology and Education Studies, Education Methods and Technologies, Linguistic Education and Pedagogy, Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques, School Choice and Performance, Evaluation of Teaching Practices, and Teacher Professional Development and Motivation.

Klieme has contributed to various scholarly papers published in recognized academic venues. Notable recent papers include:

  • Forms of inquiry-based science instruction and their relations with learning outcomes: evidence from high and low-performing education systems, 2020, International Journal of Science Education
  • Towards Developing a Theory of Generic Teaching Quality: Origin, Current Status, and Necessary Next Steps Regarding the Three Basic Dimensions Model, 2020, Zeitschrift für Pädagogik Beiheft
  • PISA 2015. Eine Studie zwischen Kontinuität und Innovation, 2021, peDOCS
  • How valid are student perceptions of teaching quality across education systems?, 2022, Learning and Instruction
  • The structure of teaching practices across countries: A combination of factor analysis and network analysis, 2020, Studies In Educational Evaluation

Klieme has also authored a book titled PISA 2012. Fortschritte und Herausforderungen in Deutschland, published in 2020 by peDOCS.

Frequent co-authors of Klieme's work include:

  • Anna-Katharina Praetorius
  • Courtney Bell
  • Juliane Grünkorn
  • Jonathan Schweig
  • Katherine E. Castellano

Their publications are predominantly found in these academic venues:

  • peDOCS
  • Zeitschrift für Pädagogik Beiheft
  • Learning and Instruction
  • International Journal of Science Education
  • Frontline Learning Research

Best Publications

  • PISA 2000: Basiskompetenzen von Schülerinnen und Schülern im internationalen Vergleich

    Jürgen Baumert;Eckhard Klieme;Michael Neubrand;Manfred Prenzel

  • Zur Entwicklung nationaler Bildungsstandards. Eine Expertise

    Eckhard Klieme;Hermann Avenarius;Werner Blum;Peter Döbrich

  • Kompetenzkonzepte in den Sozialwissenschaften und im erziehungswissenschaftlichen Diskurs

    Eckhard Klieme;Johannes Hartig

  • PISA 2009. Bilanz nach einem Jahrzehnt

    Eckhard Klieme;Cordula Artelt;Johannes Hartig;Nina Jude

  • Student ratings of teaching quality in primary school: Dimensions and prediction of student outcomes

    Benjamin Fauth;Jasmin Decristan;Svenja Rieser;Eckhard Klieme

  • Generic dimensions of teaching quality: the German framework of Three Basic Dimensions

    Anna-Katharina Praetorius;Eckhard Klieme;Benjamin Herbert;Petra Pinger

  • The Pythagoras Study. Investigating effects of teaching and learning in Swiss and German mathematics classrooms

    E Klieme;C Pauli;K Reusser;T Janik

  • Quality of geometry instruction and its short-term impact on students' understanding of the Pythagorean Theorem

    Frank Lipowsky;Katrin Rakoczy;Christine Pauli;Barbara Drollinger-Vetter

  • Promotion of self-regulated learning in classrooms : Investigating frequency, quality, and consequences for student performance

    Saskia Kistner;Katrin Rakoczy;Barbara Otto;Charlotte Dignath-van Ewijk

  • Kompetenz und Kompetenzdiagnostik

    Johannes Hartig;Eckhard Klieme

  • Mathematikunterricht in der Sekundarstufe I: "Aufgabenkultur" und Unterrichtsgestaltung

    Eckhard Klieme;Gundel Schümer;Steffen Knoll

  • PISA 2006 : Die Ergebnisse der dritten internationalen Vergleichsstudie

    Manfred Prenzel;Cordula Artelt;Jürgen Baumert;Werner Blum

  • Current Issues in Competence Modeling and Assessment

    Karoline Koeppen;Johannes Hartig;Eckhard Klieme;Detlev Leutner

  • The effects of teacher competence on student outcomes in elementary science education: The mediating role of teaching quality

    Benjamin Fauth;Jasmin Decristan;Anna-Theresia Decker;Gerhard Büttner

  • Empirische Unterrichtsforschung und Fachdidaktik. Outcome-orientierte Messung und Prozessqualität des Unterrichts

    Eckhard Klieme;Katrin Rakoczy

  • Pisa 2012 : Fortschritte und Herausforderungen in Deutschland

    Manfred Prenzel;Christine Sälzer;Eckhard Klieme;Olaf Köller

  • One lesson is all you need? Stability of instructional quality across lessons.

    Anna-Katharina Praetorius;Christine Pauli;Kurt Reusser;Katrin Rakoczy

  • Ganztagsschule in Deutschland. Ergebnisse der Ausgangserhebung der "Studie zur Entwicklung von Ganztagsschulen" (StEG).

    Heinz Günter Holtappels;Eckhard Klieme;Thomas Rauschenbach;Ludwig Stecher

  • The time on task effect in reading and problem solving is moderated by task difficulty and skill: Insights from a computer-based large-scale assessment.

    Frank Goldhammer;Johannes Naumann;Annette Stelter;Krisztina Tóth

  • The concept of competence in educational contexts.

    Eckhard Klieme;Johannes Hartig;Dominique Rauch

  • PISA 2000 : Zusammenfassung zentraler Befunde

    Cordula Artelt;Jürgen Baumert;Eckhard Klieme;Michael Neubrand

  • The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: the role of feedback’s perceived usefulness

    Birgit Harks;Katrin Rakoczy;John Hattie;Michael Besser

  • Lehrerkooperation in der Schule: Konzeption, Erfassung, Ergebnisse

    Brigitte Steinert;Eckhard Klieme;Katharina Maag Merki;Peter Döbrich

  • The Power of Video Studies in Investigating Teaching andLearning in the Classroom

    Tomáš Janík;Tina Seidel;Peter Bowman;Geraldine Blomberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Manfred Prenzel
Manfred Prenzel Technical University of Munich
Detlev Leutner
Detlev Leutner University of Duisburg-Essen
Wolfgang Schneider
Wolfgang Schneider University of Würzburg
Olaf Köller
Olaf Köller Leibniz Association
Ulrich Schiefele
Ulrich Schiefele University of Potsdam
Mareike Kunter
Mareike Kunter Goethe University Frankfurt
Joachim Funke
Joachim Funke Heidelberg University
Oliver Lüdtke
Oliver Lüdtke Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education
Reinhard Pekrun
Reinhard Pekrun Australian Catholic University
John Hattie
John Hattie University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse online degree opportunities and flexible career pathways. Many students now seek the affordable online masters in psychology to advance careers in counseling, research, or mental health services, while keeping education costs manageable.

If you aim to fast-track your academic journey, consider accelerated edd programs or other accelerated degree programs online. These options allow driven students to complete their education quicker and enter the workforce sooner, making them ideal for career-changers or professionals seeking advancement.

For those interested in broadening expertise with greater flexibility, online masters programs can be completed in as little as one year. Online study not only supports work-life balance but also provides access to respected universities and global networking opportunities.

Whether you choose psychology, education, or another social science, online degrees provide pathways to meaningful roles in education, policy, public service, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Eckhard Klieme

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles