World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
101
Citations
69180
World Ranking
585
National Ranking
372

Kennon M. Sheldon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kennon M. Sheldon sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 261 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kennon M. Sheldon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kennon M. Sheldon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kennon M. Sheldon is affiliated with the University of Missouri in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the broad fields of psychology and neuroscience, with a particular focus on social psychology, cognitive neuroscience, and applied psychology. The subfields of their work also include experimental and cognitive psychology, as well as sociology and political science.

Their academic contributions frequently appear in several publication venues, with notable recurring appearances in The Journal of Positive Psychology, Motivation Science, Journal of Research in Personality, Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, and Perception.

The main topics of their research cover:

  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Cultural Differences and Values
  • Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research
  • Free Will and Agency
  • Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
  • Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Some of the recent papers authored by Kennon M. Sheldon include:

  • Methods of gratitude expression and their effects upon well-being: Texting may be just as rewarding as and less risky than face-to-face, 2021, The Journal of Positive Psychology
  • Duchenne Smiles as Honest Signals of Chronic Positive Mood, 2021, Perspectives on Psychological Science
  • The Glow Still Shows: Effects of Facial Masking on Perceptions of Duchenne Versus Social Smiles, 2021, Perception

In addition to their work, they frequently collaborate with various researchers including Liudmila Titova, Ryan Goffredi, Mike Corcoran, Evgeny Osin, and Sen-Chi Yu.

Best Publications

  • Pursuing Happiness: The Architecture of Sustainable Change

    Sonja Lyubomirsky;Kennon M. Sheldon;David Schkade

  • Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-being: the self-concordance model.

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Andrew J. Elliot

  • Daily Well-Being: The Role of Autonomy, Competence, and Relatedness

    Harry T. Reis;Kennon M. Sheldon;Shelly L. Gable;Joseph Roscoe

  • Basic psychological need satisfaction, need frustration, and need strength across four cultures

    Beiwen Chen;Maarten Vansteenkiste;Wim Beyers;Liesbet Boone

  • What is satisfying about satisfying events? Testing 10 candidate psychological needs.

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Andrew J. Elliot;Youngmee Kim;Tim Kasser

  • Why positive psychology is necessary.

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Laura King

  • Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: the synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts.

    Maarten Vansteenkiste;Joke Simons;Willy Lens;Kennon M. Sheldon

  • Intrinsic motivation and exercise adherence.

    Richard M. Ryan;Christina M. Frederick;Deborah Lepes;Noel Rubio

  • What Makes for a Good Day? Competence and Autonomy in the Day and in the Person

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Richard Ryan;Harry T. Reis

  • Coherence and congruence: two aspects of personality integration.

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Tim Kasser

  • Trait Self and True Self: Cross-Role Variation in the Big-Five Personality Traits and Its Relations With Psychological Authenticity and Subjective Well-Being

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Richard M. Ryan;Laird J. Rawsthorne;Barbara Ilardi

  • How to increase and sustain positive emotion: The effects of expressing gratitude and visualizing best possible selves

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Sonja Lyubomirsky

  • The Independent Effects of Goal Contents and Motives on Well-Being: It’s Both What You Pursue and Why You Pursue It

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Richard M. Ryan;Edward L. Deci;Tim Kasser

  • Pursuing Personal Goals: Skills Enable Progress, but Not all Progress is Beneficial

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Tim Kasser

  • Not all Personal Goals are Personal: Comparing Autonomous and Controlled Reasons for Goals as Predictors of Effort and Attainment

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Andrew J. Elliot

  • All goals are not created equal: An organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation.

    Richard M. Ryan;Kennon M. Sheldon;Tim Kasser;Edward L. Deci

  • Becoming happier takes both a will and a proper way: an experimental longitudinal intervention to boost well-being.

    Sonja Lyubomirsky;Rene Dickerhoof;Julia K. Boehm;Kennon M. Sheldon

  • The Structure of Goal Contents Across 15 Cultures.

    Frederick M. E. Grouzet;Tim Kasser;Aaron Ahuvia;José Miguel Fernández Dols

  • Self-concordance, goal attainment, and the pursuit of happiness : Can there be an upward spiral?

    Kennon M. Sheldon;Linda Houser-Marko

  • Avoidance achievement motivation: A personal goals analysis.

    Andrew J. Elliot;Kennon M. Sheldon

Frequent Co-Authors

Tim Kasser
Tim Kasser Knox College
Richard M. Ryan
Richard M. Ryan Australian Catholic University
Sonja Lyubomirsky
Sonja Lyubomirsky University of California, Riverside
Geoffrey C. Williams
Geoffrey C. Williams University of Rochester
Thomas E. Joiner
Thomas E. Joiner Florida State University
Andrew J. Elliot
Andrew J. Elliot University of Rochester
Edward L. Deci
Edward L. Deci University of Rochester
Jamie Arndt
Jamie Arndt University of Missouri
Maarten Vansteenkiste
Maarten Vansteenkiste Ghent University
Youngmee Kim
Youngmee Kim University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options in Psychology can open doors to a wide range of career pathways in mental health, counseling, and therapy. While the flexibility of online programs appeals to many students, it’s essential to understand the educational and licensing requirements that vary by location.

For those considering a career as a licensed therapist, degree and training prerequisites differ from city to city. For example, Toledo licensed therapist education requirements include specific graduate coursework and supervised clinical hours. Similarly, learning about how to become a licensed therapist in Tucson highlights the steps you need to take in Arizona, including passing state-recognized exams.

If you plan to practice elsewhere, studying the licensed therapist requirements in Tulsa or learning how to become a licensed therapist in Virginia Beach will clarify state and city-specific procedures, background checks, and continuing education needs.

Research your state’s unique licensing criteria before choosing your psychology degree path—especially if pursuing your studies online—so you’ll be prepared for a successful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Kennon M. Sheldon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles