World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
110
Citations
46077
World Ranking
398
National Ranking
253

Todd B. Kashdan publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd B. Kashdan sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 286 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Todd B. Kashdan D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd B. Kashdan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Todd B. Kashdan is affiliated with George Mason University in the United States and primarily conducts research within the field of psychology. Their work spans over 100 publications with a notable focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, clinical psychology, applied psychology, and health. Within these areas, Kashdan addresses various topics related to psychological well-being, life satisfaction, anxiety, depression, treatment, cognitive processes, and health disparities.

Their recent scholarly contributions include research papers published predominantly between 2020 and 2021. Key papers include:

  • Understanding psychological flexibility: A multimethod exploration of pursuing valued goals despite the presence of distress. (2020, Psychological Assessment)
  • Psychological flexibility: What we know, what we do not know, and what we think we know (2020, Social and Personality Psychology Compass)
  • The Five-Dimensional Curiosity Scale Revised (5DCR): Briefer subscales while separating overt and covert social curiosity (2020, Personality and Individual Differences)
  • Valuing emotional control in social anxiety disorder: A multimethod study of emotion beliefs and emotion regulation. (2020, Emotion)
  • The effects of self-compassion on daily emotion regulation and performance rebound among college athletes: Comparisons with confidence, grit, and hope (2021, Psychology of Sport and Exercise)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Kashdan in their research include:

  • Fallon R. Goodman
  • Patrick E. McKnight
  • David J. Disabato
  • Kerry C. Kelso
  • James Doorley

Publications frequently appear in specific venues with multiple contributions, including:

  • The Journal of Positive Psychology
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Personality and Individual Differences
  • Emotion
  • Journal of Affective Disorders

Exploring the themes within Kashdan's body of work reveals a concentration on areas such as psychological well-being and life satisfaction, anxiety and depression, mental health research, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development. Their work systematically addresses both theoretical constructs and applied research questions related to psychological flexibility, emotion regulation, and curiosity.

The variety and breadth of topics studied demonstrate a multidisciplinary approach grounded in clinical and social psychological frameworks. The collaboration network and publication venues reflect active engagement with contemporary psychological research communities and broader health-related topics in psychology.

Best Publications

  • Psychological flexibility as a fundamental aspect of health.

    Todd B. Kashdan;Johnathan Rottenberg

  • Experiential avoidance as a generalized psychological vulnerability: comparisons with coping and emotion regulation strategies.

    Todd B. Kashdan;Velma Barrios;John P. Forsyth;Michael F. Steger

  • Reconsidering happiness: the costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia

    Todd B. Kashdan;Robert Biswas-Diener;Laura A. King

  • Understanding the Search for Meaning in Life: Personality, Cognitive Style, and the Dynamic Between Seeking and Experiencing Meaning

    Michael F. Steger;Todd B. Kashdan;Brandon A. Sullivan;Danielle Lorentz

  • Curiosity and Exploration: Facilitating Positive Subjective Experiences and Personal Growth Opportunities

    Todd B Kashdan;Paul Rose;Frank D Fincham

  • Meaning in life across the life span: Levels and correlates of meaning in life from emerging adulthood to older adulthood

    Michael F. Steger;Shigehiro Oishi;Todd B. Kashdan

  • Purpose in Life as a System That Creates and Sustains Health and Well-Being: An Integrative, Testable Theory

    Patrick E. McKnight;Todd B. Kashdan

  • The Curiosity and Exploration Inventory-II: Development, factor structure, and psychometrics.

    Todd B. Kashdan;Matthew W. Gallagher;Paul J. Silvia;Beate P. Winterstein

  • Being good by doing good: Daily eudaimonic activity and well-being

    Michael F. Steger;Todd B. Kashdan;Shigehiro Oishi

  • Gratitude and subjective well-being in early adolescence: examining gender differences.

    Jeffrey J. Froh;Charles Yurkewicz;Todd B. Kashdan

  • Using personal and psychological strengths leads to increases in well-being over time: A longitudinal study and the development of the strengths use questionnaire

    Alex M. Wood;P. Alex Linley;John Maltby;Todd B. Kashdan

  • Different types of well-being? A cross-cultural examination of hedonic and eudaimonic well-being.

    David J Disabato;Fallon R Goodman;Todd B Kashdan;Jerome L Short

  • Who benefits the most from a gratitude intervention in children and adolescents? Examining positive affect as a moderator

    Jeffrey J. Froh;Todd B. Kashdan;Kathleen M. Ozimkowski;Norman Miller

  • Expanding the Topography of Social Anxiety An Experience-Sampling Assessment of Positive Emotions, Positive Events, and Emotion Suppression

    Todd B. Kashdan;Michael F. Steger

  • Gender differences in gratitude: examining appraisals, narratives, the willingness to express emotions, and changes in psychological needs.

    Todd B. Kashdan;Anjali Mishra;William E. Breen;Jeffrey J. Froh

  • Curiosity and pathways to well-being and meaning in life: Traits, states, and everyday behaviors

    Todd B. Kashdan;Michael F. Steger

  • STABILITY AND SPECIFICITY OF MEANING IN LIFE AND LIFE SATISFACTION OVER ONE YEAR

    Michael F. Steger;Todd B. Kashdan

  • Which instruments are most commonly used to assess traumatic event exposure and posttraumatic effects?: A survey of traumatic stress professionals

    Jon D. Elhai;Matthew J. Gray;Todd B. Kashdan;C. Laurel Franklin

  • A dynamic approach to psychological strength development and intervention

    Robert Biswas-Diener;Todd B. Kashdan;Gurpal Minhas

  • Unpacking Emotion Differentiation: Transforming Unpleasant Experience by Perceiving Distinctions in Negativity

    Todd B. Kashdan;Lisa Feldman Barrett;Patrick E. McKnight

  • Materialism and diminished well-being: Experiential avoidance as a mediating mechanism

    Todd B. Kashdan;William E. Breen

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick E. McKnight
Patrick E. McKnight George Mason University
Michael F. Steger
Michael F. Steger Colorado State University
Jon D. Elhai
Jon D. Elhai University of Toledo
John B. Nezlek
John B. Nezlek University of Social Sciences and Humanities
Joseph Ciarrochi
Joseph Ciarrochi Australian Catholic University
Frank D. Fincham
Frank D. Fincham Florida State University
Jonathan Rottenberg
Jonathan Rottenberg University of South Florida
Evan M. Kleiman
Evan M. Kleiman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
John E. Roberts
John E. Roberts University at Buffalo, State University of New York
B. Christopher Frueh
B. Christopher Frueh University of Hawaii at Hilo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens up a wide range of online study options and career pathways. Many students interested in helping others consider becoming mental health counselors, a rewarding profession with a steady demand across the country. However, it’s important to note that each state and city may have different requirements for entering this field.

For example, the mental health counselor requirements in Boise emphasize state-approved education and licensing for professional practice. If you are interested in working on the East Coast, you may want to explore how to become a mental health counselor in Boston, where clinical internships are often key. In New York, Buffalo mental health counselor education requirements focus on accredited graduate degrees and supervised hours. Similarly, those looking at career options in Arizona should review the steps to how to become a mental health counselor in Chandler.

Each of these pathways demonstrates the value of online psychology and counseling degrees that meet regional licensing standards, ensuring you’re prepared for local job opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Todd B. Kashdan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles