World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
16341
World Ranking
5117
National Ranking
2818

Evan M. Kleiman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evan M. Kleiman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 160 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Evan M. Kleiman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evan M. Kleiman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Evan M. Kleiman is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research work predominantly falls within the field of psychology, with a strong focus on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, and applied psychology.

The scientist's work addresses multiple topics within mental health and psychological research, including:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Kleiman has published in several prominent academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • JMIR Mental Health
  • Archives of Suicide Research
  • Behavior Therapy
  • Psychological Medicine

Among their recent papers are studies such as:

  • Feasibility and Acceptability of Ecological Momentary Assessment with High-Risk Suicidal Adolescents Following Acute Psychiatric Care (2020) published in Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for Suicide Prevention: Promise, Challenges, and Future Directions (2022) published in Psychiatry
  • A Pilot Study Using Frequent Inpatient Assessments of Suicidal Thinking to Predict Short-Term Postdischarge Suicidal Behavior (2021) published in JAMA Network Open
  • Mapping the timescale of suicidal thinking (2023) published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Consensus Statement on Ethical & Safety Practices for Conducting Digital Monitoring Studies with People at Risk of Suicide and Related Behaviors (2020) published in Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice

The scientist collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Matthew K. Nock
  • Kate H. Bentley
  • Annabelle M. Mournet
  • Alexander J. Millner
  • Catherine R. Glenn

Best Publications

  • Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research.

    Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Kathryn R. Fox;Kate H. Bentley

  • Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors as risk factors for future suicide ideation, attempts, and death: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    J. D. Ribeiro;J. C. Franklin;Kathryn Rebecca Fox;K. H. Bentley

  • Examination of real-time fluctuations in suicidal ideation and its risk factors: Results from two ecological momentary assessment studies.

    Evan M. Kleiman;Brianna J. Turner;Szymon Fedor;Eleanor E. Beale

  • Meta-analysis of risk factors for nonsuicidal self-injury

    Kathryn Rebecca Fox;Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Evan M. Kleiman

  • Annual Research Review: Suicide among youth - epidemiology, (potential) etiology, and treatment.

    Christine B. Cha;Peter James Franz;Eleonora M. Guzmán;Catherine R. Glenn

  • Social support as a protective factor in suicide: Findings from two nationally representative samples

    Evan M. Kleiman;Richard T. Liu

  • Gratitude and grit indirectly reduce risk of suicidal ideations by enhancing meaning in life: Evidence for a mediated moderation model

    Evan M. Kleiman;Leah M. Adams;Todd B. Kashdan;John H. Riskind

  • Anxiety and its disorders as risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analytic review

    Kate H. Bentley;Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Evan M. Kleiman

  • A meaningful life is worth living: Meaning in life as a suicide resiliency factor

    Evan M. Kleiman;Jenna K. Beaver

  • Annual Research Review: A meta-analytic review of worldwide suicide rates in adolescents.

    Catherine R. Glenn;Catherine R. Glenn;Evan M. Kleiman;John Kellerman;Olivia Pollak

  • A brief mobile app reduces nonsuicidal and suicidal self-injury: Evidence from three randomized controlled trials.

    Joseph C. Franklin;Kathryn R. Fox;Christopher R. Franklin;Evan M. Kleiman

  • The Hopelessness Theory of Depression: A Quarter Century in Review

    Richard T. Liu;Evan M. Kleiman;Bridget A. Nestor;Shayna M. Cheek

  • A contextual approach to experiential avoidance and social anxiety: evidence from an experimental interaction and daily interactions of people with social anxiety disorder.

    Todd B. Kashdan;Fallon R. Goodman;Kyla A. Machell;Evan M. Kleiman

  • Real-time assessment of suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

    Evan M Kleiman;Matthew K Nock

  • Digital phenotyping of suicidal thoughts

    Evan M. Kleiman;Brianna Joan Turner;Szymon Fedor;Eleanor E. Beale

  • Prospective prediction of suicide in a nationally representative sample: religious service attendance as a protective factor

    Evan M. Kleiman;Richard T. Liu

  • Social Support and Positive Events as Suicide Resiliency Factors: Examination of Synergistic Buffering Effects

    Evan M. Kleiman;John H. Riskind;Karen E. Schaefer

  • Stability amidst turmoil: Grit buffers the effects of negative life events on suicidal ideation.

    Dan V. Blalock;Kevin C. Young;Evan M. Kleiman

  • An experiential avoidance conceptualization of depressive rumination: three tests of the model

    Jeannette M. Giorgio;Jacqueline Sanflippo;Evan Kleiman;Dan Reilly

  • The Relationship Between Nonsuicidal Self-Injury Age of Onset and Severity of Self-Harm.

    Brooke A. Ammerman;Ross Jacobucci;Evan M. Kleiman;Lauren L. Uyeji

  • Self-Efficacy: A Foundational Concept for Positive Clinical Psychology

    James E. Maddux;Evan M. Kleiman

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew K. Nock
Matthew K. Nock Harvard University
John H. Riskind
John H. Riskind George Mason University
Richard T. Liu
Richard T. Liu Harvard Medical School
Kathryn R. Fox
Kathryn R. Fox University of Denver
Catherine R. Glenn
Catherine R. Glenn Old Dominion University
Joseph C. Franklin
Joseph C. Franklin Florida State University
Alexander J. Millner
Alexander J. Millner Harvard University
Jessica D. Ribeiro
Jessica D. Ribeiro Florida State University
Lauren B. Alloy
Lauren B. Alloy Temple University
Michael McCloskey
Michael McCloskey Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career advancements. Whether you’re interested in counseling, education, social research, or mental health, finding the right online program is essential.

Many students prioritize affordability and program quality. For those interested in school settings, affordable online school psychology degree programs offer a cost-effective path to a rewarding career in educational psychology.

Looking beyond psychology, some learners may consider the cheapest sociology degrees online to delve into social systems, human behavior, and policy development. These programs complement psychology studies and open additional career pathways.

For foundational studies in the field, a cheap online accredited psychology degree ensures recognized credentials without heavy financial burden. This makes psychology education broadly accessible.

Those aiming for clinical or therapeutic roles should consider the best online clinical psychology programs, which offer advanced training necessary for licensure and specialized practice.

Best Scientists Citing Evan M. Kleiman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles