World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
10825
World Ranking
8712
National Ranking
4640

Kathryn R. Fox publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn R. Fox sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Kathryn R. Fox D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn R. Fox sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kathryn R. Fox is affiliated with the University of Denver in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of psychology. Their research primarily explores areas within clinical psychology, social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, experimental and cognitive psychology, and applied psychology.

Their most cited and recent publications include:

  • Interventions for suicide and self-injury: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials across nearly 50 years of research, 2020, Psychological Bulletin
  • Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised: Development, reliability, and validity, 2020, Psychological Assessment

Fox frequently collaborates with other researchers and has coauthored numerous works with:

  • Jessica L. Schleider
  • Alexandra H. Bettis
  • Shirley B. Wang
  • Taylor A. Burke
  • Matthew W. Hughey

Their research articles have appeared in several publication venues with high frequency, including:

  • Sociology Compass
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
  • Adversity and Resilience Science
  • Behavior Therapy
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Kathryn R. Fox's main fields of study comprise psychology, with a strong emphasis on clinical psychology. Their subfields extend into social psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and cognitive approaches within experimental psychology.

The primary topics of their work focus on:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

These research interests and topics indicate a focus on mental health, especially related to vulnerable populations such as children, adolescents, and LGBTQ groups. The combination of clinical and applied psychological approaches also demonstrates an integrative examination of prevention and intervention strategies.

Best Publications

  • Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research.

    Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Kathryn R. Fox;Kate H. Bentley

  • Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors as risk factors for future suicide ideation, attempts, and death: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    J. D. Ribeiro;J. C. Franklin;Kathryn Rebecca Fox;K. H. Bentley

  • Depression and hopelessness as risk factors for suicide ideation, attempts and death: Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

    Jessica D. Ribeiro;Xieyining Huang;Kathryn R. Fox;Joseph C. Franklin

  • Meta-analysis of risk factors for nonsuicidal self-injury

    Kathryn Rebecca Fox;Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Evan M. Kleiman

  • Nonsuicidal self-injury as a time-invariant predictor of adolescent suicide ideation and attempts in a diverse community sample.

    Karen Guan;Kathryn R. Fox;Mitchell J. Prinstein

  • Anxiety and its disorders as risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analytic review

    Kate H. Bentley;Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Evan M. Kleiman

  • Interventions for suicide and self-injury: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials across nearly 50 years of research.

    Kathryn R. Fox;Xieyining Huang;Eleonora M. Guzmán;Kensie M. Funsch

  • A randomized trial of online single-session interventions for adolescent depression during COVID-19

    Unknown

  • A brief mobile app reduces nonsuicidal and suicidal self-injury: Evidence from three randomized controlled trials.

    Joseph C. Franklin;Kathryn R. Fox;Christopher R. Franklin;Evan M. Kleiman

  • Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised: Development, reliability, and validity.

    Kathryn R Fox;Julia A Harris;Shirley B Wang;Alexander J Millner

  • Adverse and Benevolent Childhood Experiences Predict Mental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

    Jenalee R. Doom;Deborah Seok;Angela J. Narayan;Kathryn R. Fox

  • Biological risk factors for suicidal behaviors: a meta-analysis

    B P Chang;J C Franklin;J D Ribeiro;J D Ribeiro;K R Fox

  • Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Diagnostic Challenges And Current Perspectives.

    Jill M Hooley;Kathryn R Fox;Chelsea Boccagno

  • Mental health among sexual and gender minority adolescents: Examining interactions with race and ethnicity.

    Kathryn R. Fox;Sophia Choukas-Bradley;Rachel H. Salk;Michael P. Marshal

  • Examining the role of sex in self-injurious thoughts and behaviors.

    Kathryn Rebecca Fox;Alexander J Millner;Cora Emily Mukerji;Matthew K. Nock

  • Psychosis as a risk factor for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    X Huang;K R Fox;J D Ribeiro;J C Franklin

  • Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised (SITBI-R): Reliability, Validity, and Inter-Informant Agreement in an Adolescent Sample

    Ilana Gratch;Sara N Fernandes;Kerri-Anne Bell;Olivia H Pollak

  • Are suicidal thoughts reinforcing? A preliminary real-time monitoring study on the potential affect regulation function of suicidal thinking.

    Evan M. Kleiman;Daniel D.L. Coppersmith;Alexander J. Millner;Peter J. Franz

  • An online, single-session intervention for adolescent self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: Results from a randomized trial.

    Mallory L. Dobias;Jessica L. Schleider;Laura Jans;Kathryn R. Fox

  • Predicting Imminent Suicidal Thoughts and Nonfatal Attempts: The Role of Complexity:

    Jessica D. Ribeiro;Xieyining Huang;Kathryn R. Fox;Colin G. Walsh

  • Longitudinal predictors of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors in sexual and gender minority adolescents.

    Diana M Smith;Shirley B Wang;Mikaela L Carter;Kathryn R Fox

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph C. Franklin
Joseph C. Franklin Florida State University
Jessica D. Ribeiro
Jessica D. Ribeiro Florida State University
Matthew K. Nock
Matthew K. Nock Harvard University
Jill M. Hooley
Jill M. Hooley Harvard University
Evan M. Kleiman
Evan M. Kleiman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jessica L. Schleider
Jessica L. Schleider Northwestern University
Alexander J. Millner
Alexander J. Millner Harvard University
Lauren B. Alloy
Lauren B. Alloy Temple University
Kate H. Bentley
Kate H. Bentley Massachusetts General Hospital
Nicholas R. Eaton
Nicholas R. Eaton Stony Brook University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to various related career paths, especially in social work, counseling, and mental health services. A growing number of universities now offer flexible online programs that make it easier for students to balance their studies with work or family commitments.

If you are interested in combining your passion for Psychology with social services, you might consider best online social work degree programs in Ohio, which highlight top universities offering accredited and accessible curriculum. Similarly, students looking for regional options can check out top online social work programs in Texas to see how local institutions are leading in online education.

Nationwide, there are rankings of the top online social work degrees in America, providing an overview of the best programs for a broader search. For those seeking specialized study in a focused area, such as Central Texas, the top online social work programs in Waco present excellent options.

With flexible program formats and diverse career outcomes, pursuing a related online degree can be a strategic step for anyone interested in psychology, mental health, or social service professions.

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn R. Fox

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles