World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
123
Citations
89783
World Ranking
222
National Ranking
142

Matthew K. Nock publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew K. Nock sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 482 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Matthew K. Nock D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew K. Nock sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 123 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the MacArthur Foundation

Overview

Matthew K. Nock is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has a research focus within the field of psychology, specifically clinical psychology. Their published works encompass significant contributions in various related subfields including social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and applied psychology.

The scientist's work centers on topics such as suicide and self-harm studies, mental health treatment and access, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, and broader mental health research topics. Additional research areas include psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, digital mental health interventions, and studies involving anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Recent notable papers by Matthew K. Nock include:

  • "Mental health and clinical psychological science in the time of COVID-19: Challenges, opportunities, and a call to action." (2020, American Psychologist)
  • "Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview-Revised: Development, reliability, and validity." (2020, Psychological Assessment)
  • "Non-suicidal self-injury among first-year college students and its association with mental disorders: results from the World Mental Health International College Student (WMH-ICS) initiative." (2021, Psychological Medicine)
  • "Advancing the Understanding of Suicide: The Need for Formal Theory and Rigorous Descriptive Research." (2020, Trends in Cognitive Sciences)
  • "Prediction of Suicide Attempts Using Clinician Assessment, Patient Self-report, and Electronic Health Records." (2022, JAMA Network Open)

Frequent coauthors in Matthew K. Nock's body of work consist of:

  • Evan M. Kleiman
  • Ronald C. Kessler
  • Alexander J. Millner
  • Mitchell J. Prinstein
  • Kate H. Bentley

The main publication venues contributing to the dissemination of this research include:

  • Suicide and Life-Threatening Behavior
  • UNC Libraries
  • Psychological Medicine
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Behavior Therapy

Matthew K. Nock was recognized as a Fellow of the MacArthur Foundation in 2011, an award reflecting a noteworthy milestone in their career.

Best Publications

  • Single Case Experimental Designs: Strategies for Studying Behavior Change

    David Harrison Barlow;Matthew Nock;Michel Hersen

  • Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research.

    Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Kathryn R. Fox;Kate H. Bentley

  • Suicide and Suicidal Behavior

    Matthew K. Nock;Guilherme Borges;Guilherme Borges;Evelyn J. Bromet;Christine B. Cha

  • Cross-National Prevalence and Risk Factors for Suicidal Ideation, Plans, and Attempts

    Matthew K. Nock;Guilherme Borges;Evelyn J. Bromet;Jordi Alonso

  • WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: Prevalence and distribution of mental disorders.

    Randy P. Auerbach;Philippe Mortier;Ronny Bruffaerts;Jordi Alonso

  • Non-suicidal self-injury among adolescents: diagnostic correlates and relation to suicide attempts.

    Matthew K. Nock;Thomas E. Joiner;Kathryn H. Gordon;Elizabeth Lloyd-Richardson

  • A functional approach to the assessment of self-mutilative behavior.

    Matthew K. Nock;Mitchell J. Prinstein

  • Prevalence, Correlates, and Treatment of Lifetime Suicidal Behavior Among Adolescents: Results From the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement

    Matthew K. Nock;Jennifer Greif Green;Irving Hwang;Katie A. McLaughlin

  • Mental disorders among college students in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.

    R. P. Auerbach;J. Alonso;W. G. Axinn;P. Cuijpers

  • Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview: development, reliability, and validity in an adolescent sample.

    Matthew K. Nock;Elizabeth B. Holmberg;Valerie I. Photos;Bethany D. Michel

  • Trends in Suicide Ideation, Plans, Gestures, and Attempts in the United States, 1990–1992 to 2001–2003

    RC Kessler;P Berglund;G Borges;M Nock

  • Mental disorders, comorbidity and suicidal behavior: Results from the National Comorbidity Survey replication.

    Matthew K. Nock;Irving Hwang;Nancy A. Sampson;Ronald C. Kessler

  • Why Do People Hurt Themselves? New Insights Into the Nature and Functions of Self-Injury

    Matthew K. Nock

  • The psychology of suicidal behaviour

    Rory C O'Connor;Matthew K Nock

  • Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors as risk factors for future suicide ideation, attempts, and death: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    J. D. Ribeiro;J. C. Franklin;Kathryn Rebecca Fox;K. H. Bentley

  • Contextual features and behavioral functions of self-mutilation among adolescents.

    Matthew K. Nock;Mitchell J. Prinstein

  • Mental health problems in college freshmen: Prevalence and academic functioning.

    Ronny Bruffaerts;Philippe Mortier;Glenn Kiekens;Randy P. Auerbach

  • Cross-national analysis of the associations among mental disorders and suicidal behavior: findings from the WHO World Mental Health Surveys

    Matthew K. Nock;Irving Hwang;Nancy Sampson;Ronald C. Kessler

  • Delineating mechanisms of change in child and adolescent therapy: methodological issues and research recommendations.

    Alan E. Kazdin;Matthew K. Nock

  • Revealing the form and function of self-injurious thoughts and behaviors: A real-time ecological assessment study among adolescents and young adults

    Matthew K. Nock;Mitchell J. Prinstein;Sonya K. Sterba

  • Twelve-Month Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Suicide Attempts in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys

    Guilherme Borges;Matthew K. Nock;Josep Maria Haro Abad;Irving Hwang

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University
Robert J. Ursano
Robert J. Ursano Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences
Murray B. Stein
Murray B. Stein University of California, San Diego
Nancy A. Sampson
Nancy A. Sampson Harvard University
Steven G. Heeringa
Steven G. Heeringa University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Alan M. Zaslavsky
Alan M. Zaslavsky Harvard University
Randy P. Auerbach
Randy P. Auerbach Columbia University
Evan M. Kleiman
Evan M. Kleiman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA opens doors to many rewarding careers, including social work and counseling. Many students opt for online psychology or social work degrees for flexibility and accessibility, which provide foundational knowledge for various professional roles.

Understanding state-specific requirements is essential if you’re interested in pursuing a career as a social worker. For instance, requirements to be a social worker in Oklahoma include obtaining a relevant bachelor’s or master’s degree, supervised fieldwork, and state licensure. Similarly, you’ll find specific Oregon social work education requirements that emphasize accredited programs and clinical experience.

In Pennsylvania, aspiring professionals should review the requirements to be a social worker in Pennsylvania to ensure they meet educational and supervised practice standards. Likewise, those interested in working in Rhode Island must familiarize themselves with the Rhode Island social work education requirements, which also outline degree, experience, and licensing criteria.

By choosing an accredited online degree and understanding state guidelines, students can position themselves for success in a range of people-focused, impactful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew K. Nock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles