World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
70
Citations
19721
World Ranking
2270
National Ranking
1320

Randy P. Auerbach publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randy P. Auerbach sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Randy P. Auerbach D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Randy P. Auerbach sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Randy P. Auerbach is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in psychology, with a particular emphasis on clinical and cognitive approaches.

The scientist's primary field of study is psychology, with significant work in several subfields including clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, and applied psychology.

The main topics covered in Randy P. Auerbach's research include:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access

Key recent papers authored or co-authored by Auerbach include:

  • Neural Correlates Associated With Suicide and Nonsuicidal Self-injury in Youth, 2020, Biological Psychiatry
  • Non-suicidal self-injury among first-year college students and its association with mental disorders: results from the World Mental Health International College Student (WMH-ICS) initiative, 2021, Psychological Medicine
  • Improving Suicide Prevention Through Evidence-Based Strategies: A Systematic Review, 2021, American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Sources of Stress and Their Associations With Mental Disorders Among College Students: Results of the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Initiative, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • Think Locally, Act Globally: Federated Learning with Local and Global Representations, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors working alongside Randy P. Auerbach include:

  • David Pagliaccio
  • Ronny Bruffaerts
  • Diego A. Pizzagalli
  • Ronald C. Kessler
  • Nicholas B. Allen

The most common publication venues for the scientist's work include:

  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Best Publications

  • WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project: Prevalence and distribution of mental disorders.

    Randy P. Auerbach;Philippe Mortier;Ronny Bruffaerts;Jordi Alonso

  • Mental disorders among college students in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys.

    R. P. Auerbach;J. Alonso;W. G. Axinn;P. Cuijpers

  • Mental health problems in college freshmen: Prevalence and academic functioning.

    Ronny Bruffaerts;Philippe Mortier;Glenn Kiekens;Randy P. Auerbach

  • The prevalence of suicidal thoughts and behaviours among college students: a meta-analysis.

    P. Mortier;P. Cuijpers;G. Kiekens;R. P. Auerbach

  • Improving Suicide Prevention Through Evidence-Based Strategies: A Systematic Review.

    J John Mann;Christina A Michel;Randy P Auerbach

  • Internet interventions for mental health in university students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Mathias Harrer;Sophia H. Adam;Harald Baumeister;Pim Cuijpers

  • The associations between non-suicidal self-injury and first onset suicidal thoughts and behaviors.

    G. Kiekens;G. Kiekens;Penelope Hasking;Mark Boyes;L. Claes

  • Barriers of mental health treatment utilization among first-year college students: First cross-national results from the WHO World Mental Health International College Student Initiative

    David Daniel Ebert;Philippe Mortier;Fanny Kaehlke;Ronny Bruffaerts

  • Sources of Stress and Their Associations With Mental Disorders Among College Students: Results of the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Initiative.

    Eirini Karyotaki;Eirini Karyotaki;Pim Cuijpers;Yesica Albor;Jordi Alonso

  • Conceptualizing the prospective relationship between social support, stress, and depressive symptoms among adolescents.

    Randy Patrick Auerbach;Joseph S. Bigda-Peyton;Nicole K. Eberhart;Christian A. Webb

  • Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among First-Year College Students: Results From the WMH-ICS Project.

    Philippe Mortier;Randy P Auerbach;Jordi Alonso;Jason Bantjes

  • Lifetime and 12-month treatment for mental disorders and suicidal thoughts and behaviors among first year college students

    Ronny Bruffaerts;Philippe Mortier;Philippe Mortier;Randy P. Auerbach;Jordi Alonso

  • Effectiveness of an Internet- and App-Based Intervention for College Students With Elevated Stress: Randomized Controlled Trial.

    Mathias Harrer;Sophia Helen Adam;Rebecca Jessica Fleischmann;Harald Baumeister

  • Psychometric properties of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire: Chinese version

    Xiongzhao Zhu;Randy P. Auerbach;Shuqiao Yao;John R. Z. Abela

  • Severe role impairment associated with mental disorders: Results of the WHO World Mental Health Surveys International College Student Project.

    Jordi Alonso;Jordi Alonso;Philippe Mortier;Randy P. Auerbach;Randy P. Auerbach;Ronny Bruffaerts

  • Examining the Course of Suicidal and Nonsuicidal Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors in Outpatient and Inpatient Adolescents.

    Catherine R. Glenn;Elizabeth C. Lanzillo;Erika C. Esposito;Angela C. Santee

  • Responses to Depression in Children: Reconceptualizing the Relation Among Response Styles

    John R. Z. Abela;Cristina M. Aydin;Randy P. Auerbach

  • Prediction of major depressive disorder onset in college students

    David D. Ebert;Claudia Buntrock;Philippe Mortier;Randy Auerbach;Randy Auerbach

  • The response styles theory of depression: A test of specificity and causal mediation

    Sabina Sarin;John R. Z. Abela;Randy P. Auerbach

  • An examination of the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale, 11th version in a sample of Chinese adolescents.

    Shuqiao Yao;Huiqin Yang;Xiongzhao Zhu;Randy P Auerbach

  • The World Health Organization World Mental Health International College Student initiative : An overview

    Pim Cuijpers;Randy P. Auerbach;Corina Benjet;Ronny Bruffaerts

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald C. Kessler
Ronald C. Kessler Harvard University
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Diego A. Pizzagalli
Diego A. Pizzagalli Harvard University
Matthew K. Nock
Matthew K. Nock Harvard University
David Daniel Ebert
David Daniel Ebert Technical University of Munich
Jennifer Greif Green
Jennifer Greif Green Boston University
Jordi Alonso
Jordi Alonso Pompeu Fabra University
John R. Z. Abela
John R. Z. Abela McGill University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a diverse range of online degrees and career pathways. One popular field is Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT), which requires a tailored mix of academic credentials, supervised clinical hours, and state-specific licensing.

If you’re interested in working in therapeutic settings, it’s important to understand the unique Las Vegas mft certification requirements as these can differ significantly from state to state. For example, aspiring therapists in Kentucky must follow specific steps for how to become a marriage and family therapist in Lexington, while Nebraska professionals adhere to Lincoln mft education requirements.

California regulations also present distinct challenges, and those interested should review the Long Beach mft certification requirements to ensure they meet all obligations. By comparing these pathways, you can select the most suitable online psychology degree and prepare for a fulfilling career.

Best Scientists Citing Randy P. Auerbach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles