World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
51764
World Ranking
5491
National Ranking
542

Andrew Carr publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Carr sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 891 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andrew Carr D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Carr sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1968 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Andrew Carr is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and specializes primarily in Medicine, with a focus on Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Epidemiology, Oncology, and Pharmacology.

Their research covers several topics within musculoskeletal and orthopedic fields, including:

  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation

Andrew Carr has contributed to a range of publications, appearing frequently in journals and platforms such as:

  • Health Technology Assessment
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BMJ Open
  • The Lancet
  • Scientific Reports

Notable recent papers include:

  • Deciphering osteoarthritis genetics across 826,690 individuals from 9 populations, 2021, Cell
  • Management of adults with primary frozen shoulder in secondary care (UK FROST): a multicentre, pragmatic, three-arm, superiority randomised clinical trial, 2020, The Lancet
  • Multi-omic single cell analysis resolves novel stromal cell populations in healthy and diseased human tendon, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Rehabilitation versus surgical reconstruction for non-acute anterior cruciate ligament injury (ACL SNNAP): a pragmatic randomised controlled trial, 2022, The Lancet
  • Progressive exercise compared with best practice advice, with or without corticosteroid injection, for the treatment of patients with rotator cuff disorders (GRASP): a multicentre, pragmatic, 2×2 factorial, randomised controlled trial, 2021, The Lancet

Frequent collaborators with whom Andrew Carr has co-authored multiple works include:

  • Stephanie G. Dakin
  • David Beard
  • Sarah Snelling
  • Jonathan Cook
  • Mathew Baldwin

Among professional recognitions, Andrew Carr was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1968.

Best Publications

  • QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS ABOUT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT

    Jill Dawson;Ray Fitzpatrick;Andrew Carr;David Murray

  • Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total knee replacement.

    Unknown

  • Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses.

    R Fitzpatrick;E Shortall;M Sculpher;D Murray

  • The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores

    D W Murray;R Fitzpatrick;K Rogers;H Pandit

  • QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS ABOUT SHOULDER SURGERY

    J Dawson;R Fitzpatrick;A Carr

  • (Open Access) Supercapacitor and supercapattery as emerging electrochemical energy stores

    Unknown

  • The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings.

    Jill Dawson;Helen Doll;Ray Fitzpatrick;Crispin Jenkinson

  • The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study

    Lee E Bayliss;David Culliford;A Paul Monk;Sion Glyn-Jones

  • Vision transformer adapter for dense predictions

    Unknown

  • Shoulder pain: diagnosis and management in primary care

    Caroline Mitchell;Ade Adebajo;Elaine Hay;Andrew Carr

  • Knee replacement

    Unknown

  • The blood supply of the calcaneal tendon

    A J Carr;S H Norris

  • Long-term outcome of frozen shoulder.

    Campbell Hand;Kim Clipsham;Jonathan L. Rees;Andrew J. Carr

  • Psychophysical and functional imaging evidence supporting the presence of central sensitization in a cohort of osteoarthritis patients.

    Stephen E. Gwilym;John R. Keltner;Catherine E. Warnaby;Andrew J. Carr

  • Arthroscopic subacromial decompression for subacromial shoulder pain (CSAW): a multicentre, pragmatic, parallel group, placebo-controlled, three-group, randomised surgical trial

    David J Beard;Jonathan L Rees;Jonathan A Cook;Ines Rombach

  • The pathology of frozen shoulder

    G. C. R. Hand;N. A. Athanasou;T. Matthews;A. J. Carr

  • Understanding of regional variation in the use of surgery

    J D Birkmeyer;B N Reames;P McCulloch;A J Carr

  • Efficient image super-resolution using pixel attention

    Unknown

  • Epidemiology of hip and knee pain and its impact on overall health status in older adults

    J Dawson;L Linsell;K Zondervan;P Rose

  • Survival analysis of joint replacements

    D W Murray;A J Carr;C Bulstrode

Frequent Co-Authors

David A. Cooper
David A. Cooper University of New South Wales
Nigel K. Arden
Nigel K. Arden University of Oxford
David J Beard
David J Beard University of Oxford
Andrew Judge
Andrew Judge University of Bristol
John Loughlin
John Loughlin Newcastle University
Ray Fitzpatrick
Ray Fitzpatrick University of Oxford
Matthew Law
Matthew Law University of New South Wales
Jennifer F Hoy
Jennifer F Hoy Monash University
Sean Emery
Sean Emery University of New South Wales
Cyrus Cooper
Cyrus Cooper University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine, exploring related online degrees can offer flexibility and a range of opportunities in the healthcare field. Options like medical billing and coding online schools provide a pathway into healthcare administration and support roles, often with quicker entry into the workforce.

For those interested in patient care, multiple nursing schools that don't require teas exams make it easier to start your journey in nursing without additional standardized testing. This can appeal to students seeking a streamlined admission process.

If the goal is a management role, consider enrolling in a health administration degree program online. These programs prepare you for leadership positions and typically offer accelerated paths to completion.

Registered nurses looking to advance can benefit from rn to np programs, bridging the gap from ADN to MSN and opening doors to advanced practitioner roles.

These diverse online pathways offer flexibility, faster entry to work, and career advancement opportunities for those passionate about healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Carr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles