World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 119 3845 3600 378 362 582 63412

Ray Fitzpatrick publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ray Fitzpatrick between 1970 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ray Fitzpatrick published across 56 years, from 1970 to 2025, averaging 11.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2014. 9 of the 631 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2014. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 13 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 20 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 20 publications 2001: 23 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 24 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 47 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 4 publications
1970 2025

631 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ray Fitzpatrick: publications per year, 1970 to 2025
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 4
1982 0
1983 3
1984 0
1985 1
1986 1
1987 2
1988 5
1989 9
1990 8
1991 9
1992 13
1993 9
1994 8
1995 5
1996 20
1997 10
1998 14
1999 17
2000 20
2001 23
2002 12
2003 18
2004 15
2005 11
2006 18
2007 12
2008 9
2009 22
2010 17
2011 16
2012 24
2013 27
2014 47
2015 28
2016 32
2017 23
2018 23
2019 27
2020 20
2021 13
2022 14
2023 12
2024 5
2025 4
Total 631
Download as CSV

Ray Fitzpatrick publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Fitzpatrick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 581–600 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 582 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509 582
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Ray Fitzpatrick D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ray Fitzpatrick sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 118–119 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302 119
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ray Fitzpatrick is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with significant contributions in the subfields of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Surgery, Sociology and Political Science, and Economics and Econometrics.

Their work covers a range of main topics, including:

  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Clinical practice guidelines implementation
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions

Fitzpatrick has published extensively, frequently contributing to the following venues:

  • International Journal of Integrated Care
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • Bone and Joint Research
  • Journal of Long-Term Care
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology

Among their recent papers are:

  • A core outcome set for pre-eclampsia research: an international consensus development study, 2020, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • Comparison of a theoretically driven cognitive therapy (the Feeling Safe Programme) with befriending for the treatment of persistent persecutory delusions: a parallel, single-blind, randomised controlled trial, 2021, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Home monitoring with technology-supported management in chronic heart failure: a randomised trial, 2020, Heart
  • Long-term Effectiveness of Adjuvant Treatment With Catechol-O-Methyltransferase or Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors Compared With Dopamine Agonists Among Patients With Parkinson Disease Uncontrolled by Levodopa Therapy, 2021, JAMA Neurology
  • The use of patient-reported outcome measures to guide referral for hip and knee arthroplasty, 2020, The Bone & Joint Journal

Frequent collaborators in Fitzpatrick's research include Michele Peters, Helen Crocker, Jonathan Cook, Laura Kelly, and Thavapriya Sugavanam. These collaborative relationships reflect ongoing engagement across interdisciplinary teams.

Best Publications

  • Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health

    Michelle Campbell;Ray Fitzpatrick;Andrew Haines;Ann Louise Kinmonth

  • QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS ABOUT TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENT

    Jill Dawson;Ray Fitzpatrick;Andrew Carr;David Murray

  • Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.

    Ray Fitzpatrick;Claire Davey;Martin J. Buxton;David R. Jones

  • Quality of life measurement: bibliographic study of patient assessed health outcome measures

    Andrew Garratt;Louise Schmidt;Anne Mackintosh;Ray Fitzpatrick

  • Primary total hip replacement surgery: a systematic review of outcomes and modelling of cost-effectiveness associated with different prostheses.

    R Fitzpatrick;E Shortall;M Sculpher;D Murray

  • The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores

    D W Murray;R Fitzpatrick;K Rogers;H Pandit

  • The development and validation of a short measure of functioning and well being for individuals with Parkinson's disease.

    V Peto;C Jenkinson;R Fitzpatrick;R Greenhall

  • The Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39): development and validation of a Parkinson's disease summary index score

    Crispin Jenkinson;Ray Fitzpatrick;Viv Peto;Richard Greenhall

  • The Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale (MSIS-29)A new patient-based outcome measure

    Jeremy Hobart;Donna Lamping;Ray Fitzpatrick;Afsane Riazi

  • Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment.

    R. Fitzpatrick;A. Fletcher;S. Gore;D. Jones

  • Surveys of patients satisfaction: I--Important general considerations.

    R Fitzpatrick

  • Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials: a review

    Fitzpatrick R;Davey C;Buxton M;D Jones

  • Measuring the impact of MS on walking ability: the 12-Item MS Walking Scale (MSWS-12).

    J. C. Hobart;A. Riazi;D. L. Lamping;R. Fitzpatrick

  • QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE PERCEPTIONS OF PATIENTS ABOUT SHOULDER SURGERY

    J Dawson;R Fitzpatrick;A Carr

  • The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings.

    Jill Dawson;Helen Doll;Ray Fitzpatrick;Crispin Jenkinson

  • Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial

    Adam Steventon;Martin Bardsley;John Billings;Jennifer Dixon

  • Impact of patient‐reported outcome measures on routine practice: a structured review

    Susan Marshall;Kirstie Haywood;Ray Fitzpatrick

  • PDQ-39: a review of the development, validation and application of a Parkinson’s disease quality of life questionnaire and its associated measures

    V Peto;C Jenkinson;R Fitzpatrick

  • Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: A qualitative study

    Caroline Sanders;Anne Rogers;Robert Bowen;Peter Bower

  • Quality of life in older people: a structured review of generic self-assessed health instruments.

    Kirstie L Haywood;Andrew M Garratt;Ray Fitzpatrick

Frequent Co-Authors

Crispin Jenkinson
Crispin Jenkinson University of Oxford
Andrew Carr
Andrew Carr University of Oxford
David W. Murray
David W. Murray University of Oxford
Sue Ziebland
Sue Ziebland University of Oxford
Helen Doll
Helen Doll University of East Anglia
Martin Knapp
Martin Knapp London School of Economics and Political Science
Stanton Newman
Stanton Newman City, University of London
Louise Locock
Louise Locock University of Aberdeen
David J Beard
David J Beard University of Oxford
Glenn Robert
Glenn Robert King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to a range of allied online degrees and alternative career pathways. For those looking to accelerate their entry into healthcare, the cheapest online accelerated BSN programs provide a fast-track to becoming a registered nurse, often designed for individuals with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree.

Registered nurses seeking career advancement may consider bridging their credentials with the cheapest RN to BSN program, which helps practicing RNs earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing conveniently online.

For those interested in advanced leadership or academic roles, a PhD nursing education online offers a flexible option to gain expertise in teaching, research, or administration within healthcare.

Non-nursing majors eager to transition directly into the field may benefit from direct entry MSN programs for non-nursing majors. These programs are designed to fast-track students without a nursing background toward a Master’s in Nursing, preparing them for advanced practice or leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Ray Fitzpatrick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles