World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
48
Citations
8866
World Ranking
3170
National Ranking
537

Louise Locock publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise Locock sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 218 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Louise Locock D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louise Locock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Louise Locock is affiliated with the University of Aberdeen in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research within Medicine and Health Professions. Their scholarly work spans various subfields, including General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Sociology and Political Science, Oncology, and Emergency Medical Services.

The main topics addressed in their research include Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Global Health Workforce Issues, Health Policy Implementation Science, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare, Mobile Health and mHealth Applications, and Medication Adherence and Compliance.

Recent publications by Louise Locock demonstrate a focus on patient experience and healthcare service improvement. Notable recent papers are:

  • How do frontline staff use patient experience data for service improvement? Findings from an ethnographic case study evaluation (2020), Journal of Health Services Research & Policy
  • Polypharmacy during pregnancy and associated risk factors: a retrospective analysis of 577 medication exposures among 1.5 million pregnancies in the UK, 2000-2019 (2023), BMC Medicine
  • Negotiation of collective and individual candidacy for long Covid healthcare in the early phases of the Covid-19 pandemic: Validated, diverted and rejected candidacy (2022), SSM - Qualitative Research in Health
  • Reducing bias in trials due to reactions to measurement: experts produced recommendations informed by evidence (2021), Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
  • Wild data: how front-line hospital staff make sense of patients' experiences (2020), Sociology of Health & Illness

Louise Locock frequently collaborates with a core group of coauthors, including Zoë Skea, Andrew Farmer, Sue Ziébland, Andrew S. Maclaren, and Rosemary Hollick. These collaborations reflect sustained partnerships within the fields related to health services research and patient care.

Their research has been published multiple times in prominent venues such as Health Expectations, BMC Medicine, SSM - Qualitative Research in Health, Sociology of Health & Illness, and the Journal of Health Services Research & Policy.

In addition to journal articles, Louise Locock has contributed to book publications, including a work titled Co-Producing and Co-Designing published by Cambridge University Press in 2022.

Louise Locock is recognized as a Fellow of the Academy of Social Sciences in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Patients and staff as codesigners of healthcare services

    Glenn Robert;Jocelyn Cornwell;Louise Locock;Arnie Purushotham

  • Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care

    Angela Coulter;Louise Locock;Sue Ziebland;Joe Calabrese

  • Knowledge to action? Evidence-based health care in context

    Sue Dopson;Louise Fitzgerald

  • No magic targets! Changing clinical practice to become more evidence based.

    Sue Dopson;Louise FitzGerald;Ewan Ferlie;John Gabbay

  • Understanding the role of opinion leaders in improving clinical effectiveness

    Louise Locock;Sue Dopson;David Chambers;John Gabbay

  • An open letter to The BMJ editors on qualitative research

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Ellen Annandale;Richard Ashcroft;James Barlow

  • Evidence-Based Medicine and the Implementation Gap

    Sue Dopson;Louise Locock;John Gabbay;Ewan Ferlie

  • Reclaiming and redefining the Fundamentals of Care: Nursing's response to meeting patients' basic human needs

    Alison Kitson;Tiffany Conroy;Kerry Kuluski;Louise Locock

  • Is it worth it? Patient and public views on the impact of their involvement in health research and its assessment: a UK-based qualitative interview study.

    Joanna C Crocker;Anne-Marie Boylan;Anne-Marie Boylan;Jennifer Bostock;Louise Locock

  • Healthcare redesign: meaning, origins and application

    L Locock

  • Biographical disruption, abruption and repair in the context of Motor Neurone Disease

    Louise Locock;Sue Ziebland;Carol Dumelow

  • 'just a bystander'? Men's place in the process of fetal screening and diagnosis

    Louise Locock;Jo Alexander

  • “About sixty per cent I want to do it” : Health researchers’ attitudes to, and experiences of, patient and public involvement (PPI)—A qualitative interview study

    Anne-Marie Boylan;Louise Locock;Richard Thomson;Sophie Staniszewska

  • Testing accelerated experience-based co-design: a qualitative study of using a national archive of patient experience narrative interviews to promote rapid patient-centred service improvement

    Louise Locock;Glenn Robert;Annette Boaz;Sonia Vougioukalou

  • Personal benefit, or benefiting others? Deciding whether to take part in clinical trials.

    Louise Locock;Lorraine Smith

  • The impact of self-harm by young people on parents and families: a qualitative study.

    Anne E Ferrey;Nicholas D Hughes;Sue Simkin;Louise Locock

  • Personal identity and the role of ‘carer’ among relatives and friends of people with multiple sclerosis

    Nic Hughes;Louise Locock;Sue Ziebland

  • 'All in the same boat'? Patient and carer attitudes to peer support and social comparison in Motor Neurone Disease (MND).

    Louise Locock;Janice B. Brown

  • The power of symbolic capital in patient and public involvement in health research

    Louise Locock;Anne-Marie Boylan;Rosamund Snow;Sophie Staniszewska

  • “Making it All Normal”: The Role of the Internet in Problematic Pregnancy

    Pam K. Lowe;John Powell;Frances Griffiths;Margaret Thorogood

  • Drawing Straight Lines along Blurred Boundaries: Qualitative Research, Patient and Public Involvement in Medical Research, Co-Production and Co-Design.

    Louise Locock;Annette Boaz;Annette Boaz

  • Implementation of evidence-based medicine: evaluation of the Promoting Action on Clinical Effectiveness programme

    Sue Dopson;Louise Locock;David Chambers;John Gabbay

  • Using a national archive of patient experience narratives to promote local patient-centered quality improvement: an ethnographic process evaluation of 'accelerated' experience-based co-design.

    Louise Locock;Glenn Robert;Annette Boaz;Sonia Vougioukalou

Frequent Co-Authors

Sue Ziebland
Sue Ziebland University of Oxford
Glenn Robert
Glenn Robert King's College London
Sue Dopson
Sue Dopson University of Oxford
Ray Fitzpatrick
Ray Fitzpatrick University of Oxford
Marian Knight
Marian Knight University of Oxford
Peter Brocklehurst
Peter Brocklehurst University of Birmingham
Ewan Ferlie
Ewan Ferlie King's College London
Louise Fitzgerald
Louise Fitzgerald University of Oxford
Keith Hawton
Keith Hawton University of Oxford
Sally Wyke
Sally Wyke University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Social Sciences or Humanities opens the door to diverse pathways—whether in social work, education, counseling, research, or management. Many institutions in the USA now offer flexible one year masters programs, allowing students to earn advanced credentials quickly while managing other life commitments.

If you’re looking to jumpstart your career even sooner, consider online accelerated programs that let you complete a bachelor’s degree faster than traditional timelines. These flexible options suit those eager to enter the workforce or pursue graduate study without delay.

High-quality education doesn’t have to be expensive. Aspiring social workers can enroll in cheapest online msw programs to gain practical skills for community impact and mental health careers at an affordable cost.

For those interested in behavior analysis, earning credentials through bcba programs online can lead to roles supporting individuals with behavioral challenges, both in schools and clinical settings.

Each of these online pathways provides flexibility, affordability, and career readiness—making it easier than ever to advance in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Louise Locock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles