World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
31704
World Ranking
13056
National Ranking
6668

Steven M. Paul publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Paul sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 177 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steven M. Paul D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steven M. Paul sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steven M. Paul is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research focuses extensively on medicine, with a strong emphasis on subfields including physiology, molecular biology, cognitive neuroscience, psychiatry and mental health, and neurology.

Their main research topics cover a range of areas, most notably:

  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Dementia and cognitive impairment research
  • Functional brain connectivity studies
  • Bioinformatics and genomic networks
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Genetic associations and epidemiology
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces

Steven M. Paul has contributed to multiple recent scientific papers, including:

  • Longitudinal Associations of Blood Phosphorylated Tau181 and Neurofilament Light Chain With Neurodegeneration in Alzheimer Disease (2021), published in JAMA Neurology
  • Challenges and Opportunities with Causal Discovery Algorithms: Application to Alzheimer's Pathophysiology (2020), published in Scientific Reports
  • Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor Agonists as Novel Treatments for Schizophrenia (2022), published in American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Deep learning-based polygenic risk analysis for Alzheimer's disease prediction (2023), published in Communications Medicine
  • An IL1RL1 genetic variant lowers soluble ST2 levels and the risk effects of APOE-ε4 in female patients with Alzheimer's disease (2022), published in Nature Aging

Frequent coauthors of Steven M. Paul include:

  • John C. Morris
  • Michael W. Weiner
  • Arthur W. Toga
  • Laurel Beckett
  • Andrew J. Saykin

They have published regularly in several scientific venues, predominantly:

  • Scientific Reports (6 publications)
  • JAMA Neurology (3 publications)
  • GeroScience (3 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (3 publications)
  • International Journal of Research and Review (3 publications)

Their work encompasses multiple facets of Alzheimer's disease and dementia research, contributing to fields that intersect neurology, molecular biology, and psychiatry. This multidisciplinary approach is reflected in their collaboration with leading researchers and publications in respected medical and neuroscience journals.

Best Publications

  • Peripheral anti-Aβ antibody alters CNS and plasma Aβ clearance and decreases brain Aβ burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

    Ronald B. DeMattos;Kelly R. Bales;David J. Cummins;Jean-Cosme Dodart

  • Human apoE Isoforms Differentially Regulate Brain Amyloid-β Peptide Clearance

    Joseph M. Castellano;Jungsu Kim;Floy R. Stewart;Hong Jiang

  • Immunization reverses memory deficits without reducing brain Aβ burden in Alzheimer's disease model

    Jean Cosme Dodart;Kelly R. Bales;Kimberley S. Gannon;Stephen J. Greene

  • Early role of vascular dysregulation on late-onset Alzheimer’s disease based on multifactorial data-driven analysis

    Y. Iturria-Medina;R. C. Sotero;P. J. Toussaint;J. M. Mateos-Pérez

  • Apolipoprotein E isoform-dependent amyloid deposition and neuritic degeneration in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

    David M. Holtzman;Kelly R. Bales;Tanya Tenkova;Anne M. Fagan

  • Lack of apolipoprotein E dramatically reduces amyloid beta-peptide deposition.

    Kelly R. Bales;Tatyana Verina;Richard C. Dodel;Richard C. Dodel;Yansheng Du

  • TREM2 Haplodeficiency in Mice and Humans Impairs the Microglia Barrier Function Leading to Decreased Amyloid Compaction and Severe Axonal Dystrophy

    Peng Yuan;Carlo Condello;C. Dirk Keene;Yaming Wang

  • Neuronal sorting protein-related receptor sorLA/LR11 regulates processing of the amyloid precursor protein.

    Olav M. Andersen;Juliane Reiche;Vanessa Schmidt;Michael Gotthardt

  • Brain to Plasma Amyloid-β Efflux: a Measure of Brain Amyloid Burden in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease

    Ronald B. DeMattos;Kelly R. Bales;David J. Cummins;Steven M. Paul;Steven M. Paul

  • Apolipoprotein E promotes astrocyte colocalization and degradation of deposited amyloid-beta peptides

    Milla Koistinaho;Suizhen Lin;Xin Wu;Michail Esterman

  • Apolipoprotein E is essential for amyloid deposition in the APP(V717F) transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease.

    Kelly R. Bales;Tatyana Verina;David J. Cummins;Yansheng Du

  • In Vivo Assessment of Brain Interstitial Fluid with Microdialysis Reveals Plaque-Associated Changes in Amyloid-β Metabolism and Half-Life

    John R. Cirrito;Patrick C. May;Mark A. O'Dell;Jennie W. Taylor

  • Uncovering the heterogeneity and temporal complexity of neurodegenerative diseases with Subtype and Stage Inference

    Alexandra L Young;Razvan V Marinescu;Neil P Oxtoby;Martina Bocchetta

  • ApoE and Clusterin Cooperatively Suppress Aβ Levels and Deposition: Evidence that ApoE Regulates Extracellular Aβ Metabolism In Vivo

    Ronald B DeMattos;John R Cirrito;Maia Parsadanian;Patrick C May

  • Exacerbation of cerebral amyloid angiopathy-associated microhemorrhage in amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice by immunotherapy is dependent on antibody recognition of deposited forms of amyloid beta.

    Margaret M. Racke;Laura I. Boone;Deena L. Hepburn;Maia Parsadainian

  • Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs Can Lower Amyloidogenic Aß42 by Inhibiting Rho

    Yan Zhou;Yuan Su;Baolin Li;Feng Liu

  • A gamma-secretase inhibitor decreases amyloid-beta production in the central nervous system.

    Randall J. Bateman;Eric R. Siemers;Kwasi G. Mawuenyega;Guolin Wen

  • Overexpression of ABCA1 reduces amyloid deposition in the PDAPP mouse model of Alzheimer disease

    Suzanne E. Wahrle;Hong Jiang;Maia Parsadanian;Jungsu Kim

  • Expression of human apolipoprotein E reduces amyloid-β deposition in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

    David M. Holtzman;Kelly R. Bales;Shan Wu;Priyanka Bhat

  • Apolipoprotein E facilitates neuritic and cerebrovascular plaque formation in an Alzheimer's disease model.

    David M. Holtzman;Anne M. Fagan;Brian Mackey;Tanya Tenkova

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald C. Petersen
Ronald C. Petersen University of Pennsylvania
William Z. Potter
William Z. Potter National Institutes of Health
Steven E. Arnold
Steven E. Arnold Harvard University
Paul S. Aisen
Paul S. Aisen University of Southern California
Ronald G. Crystal
Ronald G. Crystal Cornell University
Reisa A. Sperling
Reisa A. Sperling Brigham and Women's Hospital
Peter J. Snyder
Peter J. Snyder University of Rhode Island
Marilyn S. Albert
Marilyn S. Albert Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Virginia M.-Y. Lee
Virginia M.-Y. Lee University of Pennsylvania
Maja Bucan
Maja Bucan University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but want flexible study options, numerous online healthcare degrees can open doors. Many students start their journey with cheap online nursing programs, which provide a strong foundation in patient care and medical principles while being budget-friendly.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, the cheapest online rn to bsn programs let RNs deepen their expertise and unlock greater career opportunities through an affordable, flexible pathway.

Those seeking to take their credentials to the highest academic level can explore the cheapest phd nursing programs, which focus on nursing leadership, research, and education—all attainable through online study.

Even individuals without a nursing background can quickly pivot into advanced healthcare roles. Direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online are fast-track degrees designed for career changers, allowing you to become a nurse practitioner without prior nursing experience.

Each of these pathways offers flexibility, affordability, and the chance to rapidly grow your healthcare career—even if you’re starting from scratch or switching professions.

Best Scientists Citing Steven M. Paul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles