World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
134
Citations
90082
World Ranking
291
National Ranking
23

Medicine

D-Index
140
Citations
98966
World Ranking
1659
National Ranking
168

Trisha Greenhalgh publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trisha Greenhalgh sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 945 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Trisha Greenhalgh D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Trisha Greenhalgh sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 140 D-Index — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Trisha Greenhalgh is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom and has an extensive publication record primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their research spans numerous subfields including General Health Professions, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Oncology, and Neurology.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Infection Control and Ventilation
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
  • Long-Term Effects of COVID-19
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes

Trisha Greenhalgh has published numerous scientific papers in high-impact venues. Some recent papers include:

  • "Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care," 2020, BMJ
  • "Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2," 2021, The Lancet
  • "Video consultations for covid-19," 2020, BMJ
  • "Covid-19: a remote assessment in primary care," 2020, BMJ
  • "Persistent symptoms after Covid-19: qualitative study of 114 'long Covid' patients and draft quality principles for services," 2020, BMC Health Services Research

Their frequent co-authors include S. E. Shaw, Laiba Husain, Joseph Wherton, Emma Ladds, and Chrysanthi Papoutsi.

The primary publication venues for their work are:

  • BMJ
  • British Journal of General Practice
  • The Lancet
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Aside from articles, Trisha Greenhalgh has contributed to books published by Cambridge University Press, including "Approaches to Spread, Scale-Up, and Sustainability" in 2024.

Best Publications

  • Diffusion of Innovations in Service Organizations: Systematic Review and Recommendations

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Glenn Robert;Fraser Macfarlane;Paul Bate

  • Realist review - a new method of systematic review designed for complex policy interventions

    Ray Pawson;Trisha Greenhalgh;Gill Harvey;Kieran Walshe

  • The challenge of complexity in health care

    Paul E Plsek;Trisha Greenhalgh

  • Beyond Adoption: A New Framework for Theorizing and Evaluating Nonadoption, Abandonment, and Challenges to the Scale-Up, Spread, and Sustainability of Health and Care Technologies

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Joseph Wherton;Chrysanthi Papoutsi;Jennifer Lynch

  • Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Richard Peacock

  • RAMESES publication standards: realist syntheses

    Geoff Wong;Trish Greenhalgh;Gill Westhorp;Jeanette Buckingham

  • Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis?

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Jeremy Howick;Neal Maskrey

  • Management of post-acute covid-19 in primary care.

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Matthew Knight;Christine A'Court;Maria Buxton

  • How to Read a Paper: The Basics of Evidence-Based Medicine

    Trisha Greenhalgh

  • Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice

    Justin Jagosh;Ann C. Macaulay;Pierre Pluye;Jon Salsberg

  • Coping with complexity: educating for capability.

    Sarah W Fraser;Trisha Greenhalgh

  • RAMESES publication standards: meta-narrative reviews

    Geoff Wong;Trish Greenhalgh;Gill Westhorp;Jeanette Buckingham

  • Storylines of research in diffusion of innovation: a meta-narrative approach to systematic review.

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Glenn Robert;Fraser Macfarlane;Paul Bate

  • How to read a paper: Papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research)

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Rod Taylor

  • Diffusion of Innovations in Health Service Organisations: A Systematic Literature Review

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Glenn Robert;Paul Bate;Fraser Macfarlane

  • CATALISE: A Multinational and Multidisciplinary Delphi Consensus Study. Identifying Language Impairments in Children.

    Dorothy V. M. Bishop;Margaret J. Snowling;Paul A. Thompson;Trisha Greenhalgh

  • Narrative based medicine: why study narrative?

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Brian Hurwitz

  • Achieving research impact through co-creation in community-based health services: Literature review and case study

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Claire Jackson;Sara E. Shaw;Tina Janamian

  • Ten scientific reasons in support of airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2.

    Trisha Greenhalgh;Jose L Jimenez;Kimberly A Prather;Zeynep Tufekci

  • Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire

    Petra M Boynton;Trisha Greenhalgh

Frequent Co-Authors

Aziz Sheikh
Aziz Sheikh University of Oxford
Geoff Wong
Geoff Wong University of Oxford
Glenn Robert
Glenn Robert King's College London
Glyn Elwyn
Glyn Elwyn Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice
Rob Procter
Rob Procter University of Warwick
Ray Pawson
Ray Pawson University of Leeds
Martin McKee
Martin McKee London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Steven Cummins
Steven Cummins London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Alastair M. Buchan
Alastair M. Buchan University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options is a flexible, affordable way to advance your career in the healthcare sector. Many students considering medicine are also interested in alternative and complementary fields. Health administration degrees online are particularly popular for those seeking leadership roles in medical facilities or healthcare systems.

Affordability is a key factor for many students. If you’re interested in hospital administration or health policy, finding the cheapest online mha programs can ease the financial burden without sacrificing educational quality.

For nurses aiming to move into advanced practice or leadership, there are several least expensive dnp programs offered fully online. These allow working professionals to study at their own pace while continuing to gain clinical experience.

Pharmacists can also benefit from distance learning opportunities, with options such as earning an online pharmd—a valuable credential for advancing in pharmaceutical care or research.

Ultimately, these online pathways make quality healthcare education more accessible and open up diverse career options beyond traditional medical school routes.

Best Scientists Citing Trisha Greenhalgh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles