World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
11444
World Ranking
7522
National Ranking
3241

Ryder P. Gwinn publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryder P. Gwinn sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 93 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ryder P. Gwinn D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryder P. Gwinn sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ryder P. Gwinn is affiliated with Evergreen Health Medical Center in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on neurological disorders and treatments, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, and neural dynamics and brain function.

Their work covers a range of scientific topics including:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Gwinn's main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, specific subfields of study are prominent in their publications:

  • Neurology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychiatry and Mental health

Frequent venues publishing Gwinn's research include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Science
  • Neurology
  • Cell Reports
  • Epilepsia

Gwinn has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Ed S. Lein
  • C. Dirk Keene
  • Andrew L. Ko
  • Jeffrey G. Ojemann
  • Nick Dee

Notable recent publications by Ryder P. Gwinn include:

  • Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy, 2020, Neurology
  • Local connectivity and synaptic dynamics in mouse and human neocortex, 2022, Science
  • Functional enhancer elements drive subclass-selective expression from mouse to primate neocortex, 2021, Cell Reports
  • Real-world experience with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal onset seizures, 2020, Epilepsia
  • Trial of Globus Pallidus Focused Ultrasound Ablation in Parkinson's Disease, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine

Best Publications

  • Conserved cell types with divergent features in human versus mouse cortex.

    Rebecca D. Hodge;Trygve E. Bakken;Jeremy A. Miller;Kimberly A. Smith

  • A randomized trial of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor

    W. Jeffrey Elias;Nir Lipsman;William G. Ondo;Pejman Ghanouni

  • Two‐year seizure reduction in adults with medically intractable partial onset epilepsy treated with responsive neurostimulation: Final results of the RNS System Pivotal trial

    Christianne N. Heck;David King-Stephens;Andrew D. Massey;Dileep R. Nair

  • Long-term treatment with responsive brain stimulation in adults with refractory partial seizures

    Gregory K. Bergey;Martha J. Morrell;Eli M. Mizrahi;Alica Goldman

  • Nine-year prospective efficacy and safety of brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal epilepsy

    Unknown

  • Local Connectivity and Synaptic Dynamics in Mouse and Human Neocortex

    Unknown

  • Mutations associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis convert superoxide dismutase from an antiapoptotic gene to a proapoptotic gene: studies in yeast and neural cells.

    Shahrooz Rabizadeh;Edith Butler Gralla;David R. Borchelt;Ryder Gwinn

  • Safety and Efficacy of Focused Ultrasound Thalamotomy for Patients With Medication-Refractory, Tremor-Dominant Parkinson Disease: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

    Aaron E Bond;Binit B Shah;Diane S Huss;Robert F Dallapiazza

  • Brain-responsive neurostimulation in patients with medically intractable mesial temporal lobe epilepsy

    Eric B. Geller;Tara L. Skarpaas;Robert E. Gross;Robert R. Goodman

  • Human neocortical expansion involves glutamatergic neuron diversification

    Jim Berg;Staci A. Sorensen;Jonathan T. Ting;Jonathan T. Ting;Jeremy A. Miller

  • The temporal profile of 72-kDa heat-shock protein expression following global ischemia

    RP Simon;H Cho;R Gwinn;DH Lowenstein

  • Brain-responsive neurostimulation in patients with medically intractable seizures arising from eloquent and other neocortical areas.

    Barbara C. Jobst;Ritu Kapur;Gregory L. Barkley;Carl W. Bazil

  • h-Channels Contribute to Divergent Intrinsic Membrane Properties of Supragranular Pyramidal Neurons in Human versus Mouse Cerebral Cortex.

    Brian E. Kalmbach;Brian E. Kalmbach;Anatoly Buchin;Brian Long;Jennie Close

  • Sparse recurrent excitatory connectivity in the microcircuit of the adult mouse and human cortex.

    Stephanie C Seeman;Luke Campagnola;Pasha A Davoudian;Alex Hoggarth

  • Prior ischemic stress protects against experimental stroke

    Roger P. Simon;Masaki Niiro;Ryder Gwinn

  • Lateralization of mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with chronic ambulatory electrocorticography

    David King-Stephens;Emily Mirro;Peter B. Weber;Kenneth D. Laxer

  • Differential DNA methylation profiles of coding and non-coding genes define hippocampal sclerosis in human temporal lobe epilepsy

    Suzanne F.C. Miller-Delaney;Kenneth Bryan;Sudipto Das;Ross C. McKiernan

  • A prospective trial of magnetic resonance–guided focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor: Results at the 2-year follow-up

    Jin Woo Chang;Chang Kyu Park;Nir Lipsman;Michael L Schwartz

  • Functional enhancer elements drive subclass-selective expression from mouse to primate neocortex

    John K. Mich;Lucas T. Graybuck;Erik E. Hess;Joseph T. Mahoney

  • Trial of Globus Pallidus Focused Ultrasound Ablation in Parkinson's Disease.

    Unknown

  • Reduction of glutamate release and protection against ischemic brain damage by BW 1003C87.

    B.S. Meldrum;J.H. Swan;M.J. Leach;M.H. Millan

  • Increased expression of mRNA encoding calbindin-D28K, the glucose-regulated proteins, or the 72 kDA heat-shock protein in three models of acute CNS injury

    D H Lowenstein;R P Gwinn;M S Seren;R P Simon

  • Long-termtreatmentwithresponsivebrain stimulationinadultswithrefractorypartial seizures

    Gregory K. Bergey;Martha J. Morrell;Eli M. Mizrahi;Alica Goldman

Frequent Co-Authors

Ed S. Lein
Ed S. Lein University of Washington
Jonathan T. Ting
Jonathan T. Ting Allen Institute for Brain Science
Jeffrey G. Ojemann
Jeffrey G. Ojemann University of Washington
Hongkui Zeng
Hongkui Zeng Allen Institute for Brain Science
Christof Koch
Christof Koch Allen Institute for Brain Science
Bosiljka Tasic
Bosiljka Tasic Allen Institute for Brain Science
Martha J. Morrell
Martha J. Morrell Stanford University
Kimberly A. Smith
Kimberly A. Smith Allen Institute for Brain Science
Dileep Nair
Dileep Nair Cleveland Clinic
Nathan B. Fountain
Nathan B. Fountain University of Virginia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience can open doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways. Many students pursue certifications online in areas like data analysis, psychology, or healthcare to gain specialized skills while maintaining flexibility.

For those seeking an accessible entry point, some of the easiest college majors can offer useful foundational knowledge before advancing to neuroscience-focused study. Additionally, a growing number of students are embarking on online graduate programs aligned with related fields—such as accredited msw programs, ideal for those interested in clinical work, or those looking to support individuals with behavioral needs via bcba accredited programs online.

By exploring these options, future neuroscience professionals can customize their education, strengthen their credentials, and expand their career possibilities in multifaceted health, research, and social service environments.

Best Scientists Citing Ryder P. Gwinn

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles