World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
48
Citations
8205
World Ranking
6213
National Ranking
2715

Casey H. Halpern publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Casey H. Halpern sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 194 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Casey H. Halpern D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Casey H. Halpern sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Casey H. Halpern is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in medicine and neuroscience. Their work spans a variety of subfields, including neurology, cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, clinical psychology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

Their research principally focuses on neurological disorders and treatments, with significant attention to transcranial magnetic stimulation studies, Parkinson's disease mechanisms and treatments, neuroscience and neural engineering, epilepsy research and treatment, functional brain connectivity studies, and obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders.

Casey H. Halpern has published in multiple respected venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Neurosurgery
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Brain Stimulation
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Operative Neurosurgery

The scientist has collaborated frequently with a core group of coauthors, including:

  • Daniel A. N. Barbosa
  • Jonathon J. Parker
  • Rajat S. Shivacharan
  • Vivek Buch
  • Liming Qiu

Among their recent published papers are:

  • "Boundary-anchored neural mechanisms of location-encoding for self and others" (2020, Nature)
  • "Comparison of Treatments for Cocaine Use Disorder Among Adults" (2021, JAMA Network Open)
  • "Real-world experience with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal onset seizures" (2020, Epilepsia)
  • "Trial of Globus Pallidus Focused Ultrasound Ablation in Parkinson's Disease" (2023, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Electrophysiological dynamics of antagonistic brain networks reflect attentional fluctuations" (2020, Nature Communications)

Best Publications

  • A randomized trial of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor

    W. Jeffrey Elias;Nir Lipsman;William G. Ondo;Pejman Ghanouni

  • Wiring and Molecular Features of Prefrontal Ensembles Representing Distinct Experiences

    Li Ye;Li Ye;William E. Allen;Kimberly R. Thompson;Qiyuan Tian

  • Effects of surgical targeting in laser interstitial thermal therapy for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy: A multicenter study of 234 patients

    Chengyuan Wu;Walter J Jermakowicz;Srijata Chakravorti;Iahn Cajigas

  • Vagus nerve stimulation for epilepsy and depression

    Andrew H. Milby;Casey H. Halpern;Gordon H. Baltuch

  • Deep brain stimulation for epilepsy

    Casey H. Halpern;Uzma Samadani;Brian Litt;Jurg L. Jaggi

  • Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of obesity.

    Casey H Halpern;John A Wolf;Tracy L Bale;Albert J Stunkard

  • Deep brain stimulation in neurologic disorders.

    Casey Halpern;Casey Halpern;Howard Hurtig;Howard Hurtig;Jurg Jaggi;Jurg Jaggi;Murray Grossman;Murray Grossman

  • Prevalence of cervical spinal injury in trauma.

    Andrew H. Milby;Casey H. Halpern;Wensheng Guo;Sherman C. Stein

  • Amelioration of Binge Eating by Nucleus Accumbens Shell Deep Brain Stimulation in Mice Involves D2 Receptor Modulation

    Casey H. Halpern;Anand Tekriwal;Jessica Santollo;Jeffrey G. Keating

  • Brain shift during deep brain stimulation surgery for Parkinson's disease.

    Casey H. Halpern;Shabbar F. Danish;Gordon H. Baltuch;Jurg L. Jaggi

  • Deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens for the treatment of addiction.

    Ulf J. Müller;Jürgen Voges;Johann Steiner;Imke Galazky

  • Deep brain stimulation in the treatment of refractory epilepsy: Update on current data and future directions

    Bradley C. Lega;Casey H. Halpern;Jurg L. Jaggi;Gordon H. Baltuch

  • Trial of Globus Pallidus Focused Ultrasound Ablation in Parkinson's Disease.

    Unknown

  • Awake versus asleep deep brain stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a critical comparison and meta-analysis

    Allen L Ho;Rohaid Ali;Ian D Connolly;Jaimie M Henderson

  • Boundary-anchored neural mechanisms of location-encoding for self and others

    Matthias Stangl;Uros Topalovic;Cory S Inman;Sonja Hiller

  • Real-world experience with direct brain-responsive neurostimulation for focal onset seizures.

    Babak Razavi;Vikram R. Rao;Christine Lin;Krzysztof A. Bujarski

  • Electrophysiological dynamics of antagonistic brain networks reflect attentional fluctuations

    Aaron Kucyi;Amy Daitch;Omri Raccah;Baotian Zhao

  • Deep brain stimulation for refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): emerging or established therapy?

    Hemmings Wu;Marwan Hariz;Veerle Visser-Vandewalle;Ludvic Zrinzo

  • Cost-effectiveness of focused ultrasound, radiosurgery, and DBS for essential tremor.

    Vinod K. Ravikumar;Jonathon J. Parker;Traci S. Hornbeck;Veronica E. Santini

  • Three-year follow-up of prospective trial of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor.

    Casey H. Halpern;Veronica Santini;Nir Lipsman;Andres M. Lozano

  • Traumatic coagulopathy: the effect of brain injury.

    Casey H. Halpern;Patrick M. Reilly;Alan R. Turtz;Sherman C. Stein

  • Use of magnetic perfusion-weighted imaging to determine epidermal growth factor receptor variant III expression in glioblastoma

    Elana S. Tykocinski;Ryan A. Grant;Gurpreet S. Kapoor;Jaroslaw Krejza

  • Cognition following bilateral deep brain stimulation surgery of the subthalamic nucleus for Parkinson's disease.

    Casey H. Halpern;Jacqueline H. Rick;Shabbar F. Danish;Murray Grossman

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon H. Baltuch
Gordon H. Baltuch University of Pennsylvania
Kai J. Miller
Kai J. Miller Mayo Clinic
Max Wintermark
Max Wintermark Stanford University
Murray Grossman
Murray Grossman University of Pennsylvania
Kim Butts Pauly
Kim Butts Pauly Stanford University
Jaimie M. Henderson
Jaimie M. Henderson Stanford University
Arthur L. Caplan
Arthur L. Caplan New York University
John A. Wolf
John A. Wolf University of Pennsylvania
Robert C. Malenka
Robert C. Malenka Stanford University
Ryder P. Gwinn
Ryder P. Gwinn Evergreen Health Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Neuroscience online opens the door to various degree options and career trajectories. Students who want to fast-track their education can explore accelerated degree programs online, which allow completion of a bachelor’s in less time than traditional formats.

When considering future prospects, it’s wise to look at the best bachelor degrees for earning potential. Many neuroscience-related majors, such as biomedical engineering or computer science, rank high among the most lucrative college majors. These disciplines often provide pathways to well-compensated careers in healthcare, research, technology, and more.

Budget is also a major consideration for prospective students. Thankfully, there are numerous accredited online colleges that accept fafsa, making quality neuroscience and related programs more accessible and affordable. Carefully comparing program formats, costs, and career outcomes will help you make an informed decision as you pursue your neuroscience ambitions online.

Best Scientists Citing Casey H. Halpern

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles