World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
39
Citations
4733
World Ranking
6465
National Ranking
94

Dominik Zak publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Zak sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 132 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Dominik Zak D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Zak sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dominik Zak is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark and specializes in Environmental Science, with a primary focus on Ecology. Their research encompasses various subfields including Environmental Chemistry, Atmospheric Science, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Global and Planetary Change.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics related to Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment, Botany and Plant Ecology Studies, Geology and Paleoclimatology Research, and the effects of Fire on ecosystems.

Dominik Zak has contributed to multiple publication venues, with frequent works appearing in:

  • Geoderma
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Biogeochemistry
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Among recent publications authored or co-authored by Dominik Zak are:

  • Sulphate in freshwater ecosystems: A review of sources, biogeochemical cycles, ecotoxicological effects and bioremediation, 2020, Earth-Science Reviews
  • Wetland buffer zones for nitrogen and phosphorus retention: Impacts of soil type, hydrology and vegetation, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Rewetting does not return drained fen peatlands to their old selves, 2021, Nature Communications
  • Efficiency of mitigation measures targeting nutrient losses from agricultural drainage systems: A review, 2020, AMBIO
  • Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale, 2023, Biogeochemistry

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Rasmus Jes Petersen
  • Carl Christian Hoffmann
  • Gerald Jurasinski
  • Haojie Liu
  • Tim Urich

Dominik Zak has also contributed to book publications, including a title titled Working with Nature-Based Solutions published by TemaNord in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Iron traps terrestrially derived dissolved organic matter at redox interfaces

    Thomas Riedel;Dominik Zak;Harald Biester;Thorsten Dittmar

  • Sulphate in freshwater ecosystems: A review of sources, biogeochemical cycles, ecotoxicological effects and bioremediation

    Dominik Zak;Dominik Zak;Michael Hupfer;Alvaro Cabezas;Gerald Jurasinski

  • The mobilisation of phosphorus, organic carbon and ammonium in the initial stage of fen rewetting (a case study from NE Germany)

    Dominik Zak;Jörg Gelbrecht

  • Rewetting does not return drained fen peatlands to their old selves.

    J. Kreyling;F. Tanneberger;F. Jansen;S. van der Linden

  • Wetland buffer zones for nitrogen and phosphorus retention: Impacts of soil type, hydrology and vegetation

    Craig R. Walton;Dominik Zak;Dominik Zak;Joachim Audet;Rasmus Jes Petersen

  • Phosphorus mobilization in rewetted fens: the effect of altered peat properties and implications for their restoration

    Dominik Zak;Carola Wagner;Brian Payer;Jürgen Augustin

  • A global analysis of terrestrial plant litter dynamics in non-perennial waterways

    T. Datry;A. Foulquier;R. Corti;D. von Schiller

  • Phosphorus Retention at the Redox Interface of Peatlands Adjacent to Surface Waters in Northeast Germany

    D. Zak;J. Gelbrecht;C. E. W. Steinberg

  • Organic sediment formed during inundation of a degraded fen grassland emits large fluxes of CH4 and CO2

    Maria Hahn-Schöfl;Dominik Zak;Merten Minke;Jörg Gelbrecht

  • Simulating rewetting events in intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams: A global analysis of leached nutrients and organic matter

    Oleksandra Shumilova;Oleksandra Shumilova;Oleksandra Shumilova;Dominik Zak;Dominik Zak;Dominik Zak;Thibault Datry;Daniel von Schiller

  • Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from agricultural runoff in integrated buffer zones

    Dominik Henrik Zak;Dominik Henrik Zak;Brian Kronvang;Mette Vodder Carstensen;Carl Christian Hoffmann

  • Efficiency of mitigation measures targeting nutrient losses from agricultural drainage systems: A review

    Mette Vodder Carstensen;Fatemeh Hashemi;Carl Christian Hoffmann;Dominik Zak

  • Sulphate-mediated phosphorus mobilization in riverine sediments at increasing sulphate concentration, River Spree, NE Germany

    Dominik Zak;Andreas Kleeberg;Michael Hupfer

  • Evaluation of a well-established sequential phosphorus fractionation technique for use in calcite-rich lake sediments: identification and prevention of artifacts due to apatite formation

    Michael Hupfer;Dominik Zak;Reingard Roβberg;Christiane Herzog

  • Comparison of organic matter composition in agricultural versus forest affected headwaters with special emphasis on organic nitrogen.

    Marlen Heinz;Daniel Graeber;Dominik Zak;Elke Zwirnmann

  • Mapping and monitoring peatland conditions from global to field scale

    Unknown

  • Evaluation of phosphorus mobilization potential in rewetted fens by an improved sequential chemical extraction procedure

    D. Zak;J. Gelbrecht;C. Wagner;C. E. W. Steinberg

  • Ecosystem Service Restoration after 10 Years of Rewetting Peatlands in NE Germany

    Stefan Zerbe;Peggy Steffenhagen;Karsten Parakenings;Tiemo Timmermann

  • Sediment respiration pulses in intermittent rivers and ephemeral streams

    D. von Schiller;D. von Schiller;T. Datry;R. Corti;A. Foulquier

  • From Understanding to Sustainable Use of Peatlands: The WETSCAPES Approach

    Gerald Jurasinski;Sate Ahmad;Alba Anadon-Rosell;Jacqueline Berendt

  • Water level fluctuations in a tropical reservoir: the impact of sediment drying, aquatic macrophyte dieback, and oxygen availability on phosphorus mobilization

    Jonas Keitel;Dominik Zak;Michael Hupfer

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerald Jurasinski
Gerald Jurasinski University of Greifswald
Jürgen Augustin
Jürgen Augustin Leibniz Association
Tim Urich
Tim Urich University of Greifswald
Joachim Audet
Joachim Audet Aarhus University
Brian Kronvang
Brian Kronvang Aarhus University
Mark O. Gessner
Mark O. Gessner Technical University of Berlin
Haitao Wang
Haitao Wang Nankai University
Bernd Lennartz
Bernd Lennartz University of Rostock
Klement Tockner
Klement Tockner Goethe University Frankfurt
Michael Hupfer
Michael Hupfer Leibniz Association

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution in the USA can open doors to a variety of rewarding career pathways, many of which are compatible with online study. If you’re considering related fields, there are flexible options worth exploring. For example, students interested in communication sciences may benefit from asha online slp programs that are both rigorous and meet industry standards. For those changing careers without a relevant undergraduate background, an slp bridge program online offers a practical stepping stone.

Similarly, students aiming to transition into nursing can consider the best online bsn programs for non nurses which make the process accessible and efficient. Those interested in healthcare leadership, psychology, or support roles should explore pathways such as a psychiatric nurse practitioner position; you can learn more about regional differences with this psych np salary guide. Whether building on your biology background or pivoting careers, these programs highlight the diverse options and job prospects available for students in related scientific disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Dominik Zak

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles