World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
93
Citations
37069
World Ranking
10774
National Ranking
5543

Gary Duckwiler publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Duckwiler sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 375 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gary Duckwiler D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary Duckwiler sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 93 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary Duckwiler is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their scholarly work is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Neurology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Surgery, and Rehabilitation.

The research topics addressed by Gary Duckwiler cover various aspects of cerebrovascular and neurological disorders. Key topics include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Duckwiler demonstrate a focus on stroke treatment and outcomes. These include:

  • Reperfusion Therapy Frequency and Outcomes in Mild Ischemic Stroke in the United States, 2020, Stroke
  • Endovascular Therapy vs Medical Management for Patients With Acute Stroke With Medium Vessel Occlusion in the Anterior Circulation, 2022, JAMA Network Open
  • Frequency, Determinants, and Outcomes of Emboli to Distal and New Territories Related to Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke, 2021, Stroke
  • Predictors and Functional Outcomes of Fast, Intermediate, and Slow Progression Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke, 2020, Stroke
  • The "Bright Falx" Sign-Midline Embolic Penetration Is Associated With Faster Resolution of Chronic Subdural Hematoma After Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization: A Case Series, 2022, Neurosurgery

Gary Duckwiler has collaborated frequently with several researchers, indicating a sustained partnership in scholarly work. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Geoffrey P. Colby
  • Satoshi Tateshima
  • Reza Jahan
  • May Nour
  • Viktor Szeder

The bulk of their research has been published in journals that specialize in stroke and neurological intervention. Main publication venues are:

  • Stroke
  • Stroke Vascular and Interventional Neurology
  • World Neurosurgery
  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases

Best Publications

  • Unruptured intracranial aneurysms - Risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention

    D. Wiebers;J. Whisnant;G. Forbes;I. Meissner

  • Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach: Part 2: Preliminary clinical experience

    Guido Guglielmi;Fernando Viñuela;Jacques Dion;Gary Duckwiler

  • Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: Final Results of the Multi MERCI Trial

    Wade S. Smith;Gene Sung;Jeffrey Saver;Ronald Budzik

  • Guglielmi detachable coil embolization of acute intracranial aneurysm: perioperative anatomical and clinical outcome in 403 patients

    Fernando Viñuela;Gary Duckwiler;Michel Mawad

  • Guglielmi Detachable Coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience

    Yuichi Murayama;Yih Lin Nien;Gary Duckwiler;Y. Pierre Gobin

  • Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms A Guideline for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association

    B. Gregory Thompson;Robert D. Brown;Sepideh Amin-Hanjani;Joseph P. Broderick

  • Thrombolytic reversal of acute human cerebral ischemic injury shown by diffusion/perfusion magnetic resonance imaging

    Chelsea S. Kidwell;Chelsea S. Kidwell;Jeffrey L. Saver;Jeffrey L. Saver;James Mattiello;Sidney Starkman;Sidney Starkman

  • Endovascular treatment of posterior circulation aneurysms by electrothrombosis using electrically detachable coils

    Guido Guglielmi;Fernando Viñuela;Gary Duckwiler;Jacques Dion

  • Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results.

    A Fernandez Zubillaga;G Guglielmi;F Viñuela;G R Duckwiler

  • Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusive disease: evaluation with CT angiography, MR angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.

    Suzie Bash;J. Pablo Villablanca;Reza Jahan;Gary Duckwiler

  • Predictors of Rehemorrhage After Treatment of Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: The Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) Study

    S. Claiborne Johnston;Christopher F. Dowd;Randall T. Higashida;Michael T. Lawton

  • CT and MRI early vessel signs reflect clot composition in acute stroke.

    David S. Liebeskind;Nerses Sanossian;William H. Yong;Sidney Starkman

  • MERCI 1 A Phase 1 Study of Mechanical Embolus Removal in Cerebral Ischemia

    Y. Pierre Gobin;Sidney Starkman;Gary R. Duckwiler;Thomas Grobelny

  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detection of Microbleeds Before Thrombolysis An Emerging Application

    Chelsea S. Kidwell;Jeffrey L. Saver;J. Pablo Villablanca;Gary Duckwiler

  • Intracranial aneurysms treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil: midterm clinical results in a consecutive series of 100 patients

    T W Malisch;G Guglielmi;F Viñuela;G Duckwiler

  • Impact of collateral flow on tissue fate in acute ischaemic stroke

    Oh Young Bang;Jeffrey L Saver;Brian H Buck;Jeffry R Alger

  • Embolization of arteriovenous malformations with Onyx: clinicopathological experience in 23 patients.

    Reza Jahan;Yuichi Murayama;Y. Pierre Gobin;Gary R. Duckwiler

  • Natural history of the neck remnant of a cerebral aneurysm treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil system.

    Hayakawa M;Murayama Y;Duckwiler Gr;Gobin Yp

  • Analysis of Thrombi Retrieved From Cerebral Arteries of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Victor J. Marder;Dennis J. Chute;Sidney Starkman;Anna M. Abolian

  • ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN 2007 clinical expert consensus document on carotid stenting: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents (ACCF/SCAI/SVMB/SIR/ASITN Clinical Expert Consensus Document Committee on Carotid Stenting).

    Eric R. Bates;Joseph D. Babb;Donald E. Casey;Christopher U. Cates

Frequent Co-Authors

Reza Jahan
Reza Jahan University of California, Los Angeles
Fernando Vinuela
Fernando Vinuela University of California, Los Angeles
David S. Liebeskind
David S. Liebeskind University of California, Los Angeles
Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles
Paul M. Vespa
Paul M. Vespa University of California, Los Angeles
Neil A. Martin
Neil A. Martin University of California, Los Angeles
Chelsea S. Kidwell
Chelsea S. Kidwell University of Arizona
Bruce Ovbiagele
Bruce Ovbiagele University of California, San Francisco
Jeffry R. Alger
Jeffry R. Alger University of California, Los Angeles
James Sayre
James Sayre University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine but seeking flexible learning options or alternative pathways, online healthcare degrees have become increasingly popular. From advanced nursing roles to specialized fields like nutrition, these programs offer diverse career opportunities without the need for traditional on-campus attendance.

Registered nurses can advance their careers by enrolling in rn to np programs online, allowing them to move seamlessly into nurse practitioner roles. Similarly, those with a passion for health and food science can explore the best online nutrition programs to step into careers as nutritionists or dietitians.

For aspiring healthcare leaders, it’s crucial to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs to ensure the program’s accreditation and industry recognition. Additionally, working RNs can save time and avoid in-person obligations with online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, making career progression more accessible.

These online pathways provide options that suit different schedules and ambitions, making it easier than ever to advance in the healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Gary Duckwiler

Trending Scientists