World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 89 12574 11833 6433 5950 321 33107

Neil A. Martin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Neil A. Martin between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Neil A. Martin published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2012. 23 of the 365 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2012. 1981: 3 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 7 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 7 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 14 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 10 publications
1981 2025

365 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Neil A. Martin: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 3
1982 2
1983 0
1984 1
1985 2
1986 2
1987 5
1988 5
1989 1
1990 7
1991 4
1992 7
1993 12
1994 9
1995 6
1996 4
1997 14
1998 10
1999 6
2000 9
2001 9
2002 14
2003 10
2004 8
2005 10
2006 7
2007 9
2008 13
2009 13
2010 7
2011 7
2012 22
2013 15
2014 20
2015 15
2016 10
2017 4
2018 6
2019 3
2020 4
2021 6
2022 13
2023 8
2024 13
2025 10
Total 365
Download as CSV

Neil A. Martin publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil A. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 321 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 321
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Neil A. Martin D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil A. Martin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 89 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 89
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Neil A. Martin is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research contributions predominantly fall within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Epidemiology, Neurology, Surgery, and Physiology.

The scientist's recent publications cover a range of medical research topics, including chronic respiratory diseases, inflammatory myopathies, brain tumor surgery, and clinical trial data analyses. Notable papers include:

  • Mepolizumab for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (SYNAPSE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial (2021) - The Lancet Respiratory Medicine
  • British Society for Rheumatology guideline on management of paediatric, adolescent and adult patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (2022) - Lara D. Veeken
  • Benefit/Risk Profile of Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy in COPD (2021) - International Journal of COPD
  • Streamlining brain tumor surgery care during the COVID-19 pandemic: A case-control study (2021) - PLoS ONE
  • Peak Inspiratory Flow Rate in COPD: An Analysis of Clinical Trial and Real-World Data (2021) - International Journal of COPD

The majority of their work concentrates on the following frequently researched topics:

  • Inflammatory Myopathies and Dermatomyositis
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research

Neil A. Martin collaborates regularly with a set of frequent co-authors, including:

  • Daniel F. Kelly
  • Liza McCann
  • Lucy R. Wedderburn
  • Charalampia Papadopoulou
  • David A. Lipson

Their research is often published in journals such as Lara D. Veeken, Stroke, International Journal of COPD, The Lancet Respiratory Medicine, and PLoS ONE.

Best Publications

  • A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations.

    Robert F. Spetzler;Neil A. Martin

  • Unruptured intracranial aneurysms - Risk of rupture and risks of surgical intervention

    D. Wiebers;J. Whisnant;G. Forbes;I. Meissner

  • Guglielmi Detachable Coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms: 11 years' experience

    Yuichi Murayama;Yih Lin Nien;Gary Duckwiler;Y. Pierre Gobin

  • Increased incidence and impact of nonconvulsive and convulsive seizures after traumatic brain injury as detected by continuous electroencephalographic monitoring.

    Paul M. Vespa;Marc R. Nuwer;Valeriy Nenov;Elisabeth Ronne-Engstrom

  • Cerebral hyperglycolysis following severe traumatic brain injury in humans: a positron emission tomography study

    Marvin Bergsneider;David A. Hovda;Ehud Shalmon;Daniel F. Kelly

  • Antitumor Activity of Rapamycin in a Phase I Trial for Patients with Recurrent PTEN-Deficient Glioblastoma

    Tim F Cloughesy;Koji Yoshimoto;Phioanh Leia Nghiemphu;Kevin Brown

  • Metabolic Crisis without Brain Ischemia is Common after Traumatic Brain Injury: A Combined Microdialysis and Positron Emission Tomography Study:

    Paul Vespa;Marvin Bergsneider;Nayoa Hattori;Hsiao-Ming Wu

  • Acute seizures after intracerebral hemorrhage A factor in progressive midline shift and outcome

    Paul M. Vespa;K. O'Phelan;M. Shah;J. Mirabelli

  • Characterization of cerebral hemodynamic phases following severe head trauma: hypoperfusion, hyperemia, and vasospasm

    Neil A. Martin;Ravish V. Patwardhan;Michael J. Alexander;Cynthia Zane Africk

  • Progressive hemorrhage after head trauma: predictors and consequences of the evolving injury

    Matthias Oertel;Daniel F. Kelly;David McArthur;W. John Boscardin

  • Intracranial aneurysms treated with the Guglielmi detachable coil: midterm clinical results in a consecutive series of 100 patients

    T W Malisch;G Guglielmi;F Viñuela;G Duckwiler

  • Nonconvulsive electrographic seizures after traumatic brain injury result in a delayed, prolonged increase in intracranial pressure and metabolic crisis.

    Paul M. Vespa;Chad Miller;David McArthur;Mathew Eliseo

  • Surgical management of large AVM's by staged embolization and operative excision

    Spetzler Rf;Martin Na;Carter Lp;Flom Ra

  • Posttraumatic cerebral arterial spasm : transcranial Doppler ultrasound, cerebral blood flow, and angiographic findings

    Neil A. Martin;Curtis Doberstein;Cynthia Zane;Michael J. Caron

  • Detection and characterization of very small cerebral aneurysms by using 2D and 3D helical CT angiography.

    J. Pablo Villablanca;Reza Jahan;Parizad Hooshi;Silvester Lim

  • Intensive insulin therapy reduces microdialysis glucose values without altering glucose utilization or improving the lactate/pyruvate ratio after traumatic brain injury.

    Paul Vespa;Robert Boonyaputthikul;David L. McArthur;Chad Miller

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue-type Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Decreases Perihematomal Edema

    W. Andrew Mould;J. Ricardo Carhuapoma;John Muschelli;Karen Lane

  • Increase in extracellular glutamate caused by reduced cerebral perfusion pressure and seizures after human traumatic brain injury: a microdialysis study

    Paul Vespa;Mayumi Prins;Elizabeth Ronne-Engstrom;Michael Caron

  • Persistently low extracellular glucose correlates with poor outcome 6 months after human traumatic brain injury despite a lack of increased lactate: a microdialysis study.

    Paul M. Vespa;David McArthur;Kristine O'Phelan;Thomas Glenn

  • Dissociation of cerebral glucose metabolism and level of consciousness during the period of metabolic depression following human traumatic brain injury.

    Marvin Bergsneider;David A. Hovda;Stefan M. Lee;Daniel F. Kelly

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul M. Vespa
Paul M. Vespa University of California, Los Angeles
Gary Duckwiler
Gary Duckwiler University of California, Los Angeles
Fernando Vinuela
Fernando Vinuela University of California, Los Angeles
David A. Hovda
David A. Hovda University of California, Los Angeles
Arthur W. Toga
Arthur W. Toga University of Southern California
Nader Pouratian
Nader Pouratian University of California, Los Angeles
Reza Jahan
Reza Jahan University of California, Los Angeles
Susan Y. Bookheimer
Susan Y. Bookheimer University of California, Los Angeles
Marc R. Nuwer
Marc R. Nuwer University of California, Los Angeles
Jeffrey L Saver
Jeffrey L Saver University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in a healthcare career but not sure if medical school is for you, several alternative pathways are available. Many prospective professionals consider options such as nursing, medical billing, or healthcare administration, which all play vital roles in the health system.

For those looking for quicker entry into healthcare, you might want to explore what is the easiest nursing program to get into. These programs often have less stringent prerequisites, making them more accessible for many students. Additionally, if entrance exams are a concern, some students research nursing schools that don't require teas to simplify the admissions process.

Interested in healthcare administration or the business side of medicine? Consider enrolling in online health administration programs, which can be completed at an accelerated pace and provide management-focused training. Alternatively, for those seeking an administrative or billing career, there are also medical billing and coding online schools that accept financial aid for cost-effective education.

Exploring these options can help you find the right path in healthcare—whether in direct patient care, administration, or support roles.

Best Scientists Citing Neil A. Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles