World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
62
Citations
12958
World Ranking
3546
National Ranking
1639

Nader Pouratian publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nader Pouratian sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 335 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Nader Pouratian D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nader Pouratian sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nader Pouratian is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research intersects primarily within the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a strong emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience and Neurology as key subfields. Other areas of specialization include Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to brain function and neurological health. Notable areas of research focus include:

  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Among recent publications, the following papers represent significant contributions:

  • Dynamic Stimulation of Visual Cortex Produces Form Vision in Sighted and Blind Humans, 2020, Cell
  • The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges-Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting, 2020, Neurocritical Care
  • Deep Brain Stimulation for Depression Informed by Intracranial Recordings, 2021, Biological Psychiatry
  • Therapies to Restore Consciousness in Patients with Severe Brain Injuries: A Gap Analysis and Future Directions, 2021, Neurocritical Care
  • Distinct roles of dorsal and ventral subthalamic neurons in action selection and cancellation, 2021, Neuron

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Sameer A. Sheth
  • Wayne K. Goodman
  • Kelly R. Bijanki
  • Anusha Allawala
  • Raissa Mathura

Publication venues with multiple contributions from the scientist encompass:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurosurgery
  • Brain Stimulation
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Linear and Nonlinear Relationships between Neuronal Activity, Oxygen Metabolism, and Hemodynamic Responses

    Sameer A. Sheth;Masahito Nemoto;Michael Guiou;Melissa Walker

  • Gamma Knife surgery for pituitary adenomas: factors related to radiological and endocrine outcomes

    Jason P. Sheehan;Nader Pouratian;Ladislau Steiner;Edward R. Laws

  • Gamma Knife surgery for Cushing's disease.

    Jay Jagannathan;Jason P. Sheehan;Nader Pouratian;Edward R. Laws

  • Dynamic Stimulation of Visual Cortex Produces Form Vision in Sighted and Blind Humans.

    Michael S. Beauchamp;Denise Oswalt;Ping Sun;Brett L. Foster

  • Incidence of symptomatic hemorrhage after stereotactic electrode placement

    Charles A. Sansur;Robert C. Frysinger;Nader Pouratian;Kai Ming Fu

  • Management of Low-Grade Glioma

    Nader Pouratian;David Schiff;David Schiff

  • DTI Correlates of Distinct Cognitive Impairments in Parkinson's Disease

    Zhong Zheng;Shirag Shemmassian;Christopher Wijekoon;Won Kim

  • Impact of the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education work-hour regulations on neurosurgical resident education and productivity.

    Jay Jagannathan;G. Edward Vates;Nader Pouratian;Jason P. Sheehan

  • Utility of preoperative functional magnetic resonance imaging for identifying language cortices in patients with vascular malformations.

    Nader Pouratian;Susan Y. Bookheimer;David E. Rex;Neil A. Martin

  • Gamma knife radiosurgery for medically and surgically refractory prolactinomas.

    Nader Pouratian;Jason Sheehan;Jay Jagannathan;Edward R. Laws

  • Gamma Knife radiosurgery to the surgical cavity following resection of brain metastases

    Jay Jagannathan;Chun Po Yen;Dibyendu Kumar Ray;David Schlesinger

  • Columnar specificity of microvascular oxygenation and volume responses: implications for functional brain mapping.

    Sameer A. Sheth;Masahito Nemoto;Michael Guiou;Melissa Walker

  • iEEG-BIDS, extending the Brain Imaging Data Structure specification to human intracranial electrophysiology.

    Christopher Holdgraf;Stefan Appelhoff;Stephan Bickel;Kristofer Bouchard

  • Variability of intraoperative electrocortical stimulation mapping parameters across and within individuals

    Nader Pouratian;Andrew F. Cannestra;Susan Y. Bookheimer;Neil A. Martin

  • Evaluation of coupling between optical intrinsic signals and neuronal activity in rat somatosensory cortex.

    Sameer Sheth;Masahito Nemoto;Michael Guiou;Melissa Walker

  • Advances in Brain Tumor Surgery

    Ashok R. Asthagiri;Nader Pouratian;Jonathan Sherman;Galal Ahmed

  • Surgical Performance Determines Functional Outcome Benefit in the Minimally Invasive Surgery Plus Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation (MISTIE) Procedure

    Issam A. Awad;Sean P. Polster;Julián Carrión-Penagos;Richard E. Thompson

  • Management of Cushing's disease: outcome in patients with microadenoma detected on pituitary magnetic resonance imaging.

    Daniel M. Prevedello;Nader Pouratian;Jonathan Sherman;John A. Jane

  • Multiwavelength optical intrinsic signal imaging of cortical spreading depression.

    Alyssa M. Ba;Michael Guiou;Nader Pouratian;Arpitha Muthialu

  • Gamma knife radiosurgery for acromegaly: outcomes after failed transsphenoidal surgery.

    Jay Jagannathan;Jason P. Sheehan;Nader Pouratian;Edward R. Laws

  • Impact of temozolomide chemotherapy on seizure frequency in patients with low-grade gliomas: Clinical article

    Jonathan H. Sherman;Krisztina Moldovan;H. Kwang Yeoh;Robert M. Starke

  • Outcomes and Management of Patients with Cushing’s Disease without Pathological Confirmation of Tumor Resection after Transsphenoidal Surgery

    Nader Pouratian;Daniel M. Prevedello;Jay Jagannathan;M. Beatriz Lopes

  • The Curing Coma Campaign: Framing Initial Scientific Challenges-Proceedings of the First Curing Coma Campaign Scientific Advisory Council Meeting.

    J Javier Provencio;J Claude Hemphill;Jan Claassen;Brian L Edlow

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur W. Toga
Arthur W. Toga University of Southern California
Jason P. Sheehan
Jason P. Sheehan University of Virginia
Sameer A. Sheth
Sameer A. Sheth Baylor College of Medicine
Susan Y. Bookheimer
Susan Y. Bookheimer University of California, Los Angeles
Neil A. Martin
Neil A. Martin University of California, Los Angeles
Edward R. Laws
Edward R. Laws Brigham and Women's Hospital
Richard A. Andersen
Richard A. Andersen California Institute of Technology
John A. Jane
John A. Jane University of Virginia Health System
David Schiff
David Schiff University of Virginia
Wayne K. Goodman
Wayne K. Goodman Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Neuroscience, there are several related online degrees and career pathways that can align with your interests and goals. Carefully selecting your educational path can have a significant impact on your future income and job options. For students considering their return on investment, exploring the best degrees to make money can help you choose a major or specialization that offers strong earning potential in science and healthcare.

Financial considerations are also important. Many students seek online college that accepts fafsa to help fund their education and minimize student debt. If you’re looking to quickly enter the workforce or boost your resume, pursuing online certifications that pay well can provide valuable credentials in a shorter time frame.

For those balancing education with work or family, you might be curious about what is the easiest degree to get online. Investigating these options can help you find flexible and accessible programs that support your career in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Nader Pouratian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles