World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
34
Citations
4884
World Ranking
9330
National Ranking
686

Jason Berwick publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason Berwick sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 94 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jason Berwick D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason Berwick sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jason Berwick is affiliated with the University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom. Their research activity primarily lies at the intersection of medicine and neuroscience, with a particular focus on neurology, cognitive neuroscience, cellular and molecular neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, as well as cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Berwick's scientific output includes work on several key topics, including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

Their most recent publications include:

  • Assessment of neurovascular coupling and cortical spreading depression in mixed mouse models of atherosclerosis and Alzheimer's disease, 2021, published in eLife
  • Acute effects of systemic inflammation upon the neuro-glial-vascular unit and cerebrovascular function, 2020, published in Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health
  • Validating layer-specific VASO across species, 2021, published in NeuroImage
  • Enhanced Cerebral Blood Volume under Normobaric Hyperoxia in the J20-hAPP Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease, 2020, published in Scientific Reports
  • The effects of locomotion on sensory-evoked haemodynamic responses in the cortex of awake mice, 2022, published in Scientific Reports

Berwick frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors, including Clare Howarth, Osman Shabir, Beth Eyre, Llywelyn Lee, and Luke Boorman.

Over the course of their career, they have published in several prominent venues, notably:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Neurophotonics
  • Scientific Reports
  • eLife
  • Brain Behavior & Immunity - Health

Best Publications

  • Investigating neural-hemodynamic coupling and the hemodynamic response function in the awake rat.

    Chris J. Martin;John Martindale;Jason Berwick;John E. W. Mayhew

  • Concurrent optical imaging spectroscopy and laser-Doppler flowmetry: the relationship between blood flow, oxygenation, and volume in rodent barrel cortex

    Myles Jones;Jason Berwick;Dave Johnston;John Mayhew

  • A model of the hemodynamic response and oxygen delivery to brain.

    Ying Zheng;John Martindale;David Johnston;Myles Jones

  • Neurovascular dysfunction in vascular dementia, Alzheimer’s and atherosclerosis

    Osman Shabir;Jason Berwick;Sheila E. Francis

  • Negative Blood Oxygen Level Dependence in the Rat:A Model for Investigating the Role of Suppression in Neurovascular Coupling

    Luke Boorman;Aneurin J Kennerley;David Johnston;Myles Jones

  • Spectroscopic analysis of neural activity in brain: increased oxygen consumption following activation of barrel cortex.

    John Mayhew;David Johnston;Jason Berwick;Myles Jones

  • Spectroscopic analysis of changes in remitted illumination: the response to increased neural activity in brain.

    John Mayhew;Ying Zheng;Yuqian Hou;Bob Vuksanovic

  • The Hemodynamic Impulse Response to a Single Neural Event

    John Martindale;John Mayhew;Jason Berwick;Myles Jones

  • Neurovascular coupling is brain region-dependent.

    Ian M. Devonshire;Nikos G. Papadakis;Michael Port;Jason Berwick

  • Fine detail of neurovascular coupling revealed by spatiotemporal analysis of the hemodynamic response to single whisker stimulation in rat barrel cortex.

    J. Berwick;D. Johnston;M. Jones;J. Martindale

  • The effect of hypercapnia on the neural and hemodynamic responses to somatosensory stimulation.

    Myles Jones;Jason Berwick;Nicola Hewson-Stoate;Carlos Gias

  • Neurovascular coupling investigated with two-dimensional optical imaging spectroscopy in rat whisker barrel cortex.

    J. Berwick;D. Johnston;M. Jones;J. Martindale

  • Optimised and rapid pre-clinical screening in the SOD1(G93A) transgenic mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

    Richard J. Mead;Ellen J. Bennett;Aneurin J. Kennerley;Paul Sharp

  • Concurrent fMRI and optical measures for the investigation of the hemodynamic response function.

    Aneurin J. Kennerley;Jason Berwick;John Martindale;David Johnston

  • Increased Oxygen Consumption Following Activation of Brain: Theoretical Footnotes Using Spectroscopic Data from Barrel Cortex

    John Mayhew;David Johnston;John Martindale;Myles Jones

  • A three-compartment model of the hemodynamic response and oxygen delivery to brain.

    Ying Zheng;David Johnston;Jason Berwick;Danmei Chen

  • Changes in blood flow, oxygenation, and volume following extended stimulation of rodent barrel cortex.

    Myles Jones;Jason Berwick;John E. W. Mayhew

  • Further nonlinearities in neurovascular coupling in rodent barrel cortex.

    Nicola Hewson-Stoate;Myles Jones;John Martindale;Jason Berwick

  • Hemodynamic response in the unanesthetized rat : intrinsic optical imaging and spectroscopy of the barrel cortex

    Jason Berwick;Chris Martin;John Martindale;Myles Jones

  • Key aspects of neurovascular control mediated by specific populations of inhibitory cortical interneurons

    L Lee;L Boorman;E Glendenning;C Christmas

  • An Evaluation of Linear Model Analysis Techniques for Processing Images of Microcirculation Activity

    John Mayhew;Dewen Hu;Ying Zheng;Steven Askew

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Redgrave
Peter Redgrave University of Sheffield
Theodore H. Schwartz
Theodore H. Schwartz Cornell University
Sheila E. Francis
Sheila E. Francis University of Sheffield
Paul G. Overton
Paul G. Overton University of Sheffield
Robert Turner
Robert Turner Max Planck Society
Stephen A. Billings
Stephen A. Billings University of Sheffield
Paul D. Griffiths
Paul D. Griffiths University College London
Nicola R. Sibson
Nicola R. Sibson University of Oxford
Brigitte Pettmann
Brigitte Pettmann Grenoble Alpes University
Pamela J. Shaw
Pamela J. Shaw University of Sheffield

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in neuroscience opens the door to a wide range of educational options—including many flexible online pathways. Students may consider starting with the easiest online bachelor's degree options, which can offer an accessible entry into the field or provide a strong academic foundation for more specialized graduate study.

For those seeking credentials to accelerate their careers or to specialize in a particular area, there are many certifications online that not only enhance your knowledge but can also offer lucrative employment opportunities in health, research, and education sectors.

Some students interested in neuroscience also pursue allied disciplines, such as social work or behavioral analysis. There are many cheapest msw programs or affordable paths to obtain a bcba degree online, both of which can complement neuroscience expertise and open roles in counseling, therapy, or behavioral consulting.

Whether you’re starting out or seeking advanced qualifications, online programs provide flexible, budget-friendly avenues for building a dynamic career in neuroscience and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jason Berwick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles