World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
63
Citations
26776
World Ranking
1143
National Ranking
217

Neil Mercer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Mercer sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 193 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Neil Mercer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Neil Mercer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Neil Mercer is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and social sciences, with a specific focus on developmental and educational psychology and education.

The main topics covered in Neil Mercer's work include:

  • Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Parental Involvement in Education
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Education and Technology Integration
  • Education and Critical Thinking Development

The scholar has contributed to research published in several academic venues, which include:

  • Learning Culture and Social Interaction
  • Language and Education
  • International Journal of Research & Method in Education
  • Anaesthesia
  • Qwerty

Recent papers by Neil Mercer include:

  • "Coding classroom dialogue: Methodological considerations for researchers," published in 2020 in Learning Culture and Social Interaction
  • "An analysis of the forms of teacher-student dialogue that are most productive for learning," published in 2021 in Language and Education
  • "Developing a test of reasoning for preadolescents," published in 2021 in International Journal of Research & Method in Education
  • "Issue Information - Editorial Board," published in 2023 in Anaesthesia
  • "The educational importance of oracy," published in 2024 in Qwerty

Neil Mercer collaborates with multiple researchers, frequently co-authoring with:

  • Sara Hennessy
  • Christine Howe
  • Maria Vrikki
  • Elisa Calcagni
  • Alvin Leung

The scope of Mercer's work reflects an interdisciplinary approach within educational psychology, exploring dialogue and reasoning in learning contexts, as well as innovative methods aimed at enhancing education and literacy development. Their research activity shows ongoing engagement with methodological considerations and the role of oracy in education.

Best Publications

  • Common Knowledge : The Development of Understanding in the Classroom

    Derek Edwards;Neil Mercer

  • Dialogue and the Development of Children's Thinking: A Sociocultural Approach

    Neil Mercer;Karen Littleton

  • Words and Minds : How We Use Language to Think Together

    Neil Mercer

  • The Guided Construction of Knowledge: Talk Amongst Teachers and Learners

    Neil Mercer

  • Children's Talk and the Development of Reasoning in the Classroom

    Neil Mercer;Rupert Wegerif;Lyn Dawes

  • El conocimiento compartido: el desarrollo de la comprensión en el aula

    Derek Edwards;Neil Mercer

  • Reasoning as a scientist: ways of helping children to use language to learn science

    Neil Mercer;Lyn Dawes;Rupert Wegerif;Claire Sams

  • The quality of talk in children’s collaborative activity in the classroom

    Neil Mercer

  • From social interaction to individual reasoning: an empirical investigation of a possible socio-cultural model of cognitive development

    Rupert Wegerif;Neil Mercer;Lyn Dawes

  • Interthinking: Putting talk to work

    Karen Littleton;Neil Mercer

  • Explaining the dialogic processes of teaching and learning: The value and potential of sociocultural theory

    Neil Mercer;Christine Howe

  • Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking

    Neil Mercer

  • The Seeds of Time: Why Classroom Dialogue Needs a Temporal Analysis

    Neil Mercer

  • Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning

    Sylvia Rojas-Drummond;Neil Mercer

  • The analysis of classroom talk: Methods and methodologies

    Neil. Mercer

  • Teacher–Student Dialogue During Classroom Teaching: Does It Really Impact on Student Outcomes?

    Christine Howe;Sara Hennessy;Neil Mercer;Maria Vrikki

  • Dialogic teaching in the primary science classroom

    Neil Mercer;Lyn Dawes;Judith Kleine Staarman

  • Teaching Children How to Use Language to Solve Maths Problems

    Neil Mercer;Claire Sams

  • Re-Conceptualizing "Scaffolding" and the Zone of Proximal Development in the Context of Symmetrical Collaborative Learning.

    Manual Fernández;Rupert Wegerif;Neil Mercer;Sylvia Rojas-Drummond

  • Is “exploratory talk” productive talk?

    Neil Mercer;Rupert Wegerif

  • Language and Social Psychology

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Karen Littleton
Karen Littleton The Open University
Rupert Wegerif
Rupert Wegerif University of Cambridge
Christine Howe
Christine Howe University of Cambridge
Derek Edwards
Derek Edwards Loughborough University
Sara Hennessy
Sara Hennessy University of Cambridge
Keith S. Taber
Keith S. Taber University of Cambridge
Jan D. Vermunt
Jan D. Vermunt Eindhoven University of Technology
Neil Selwyn
Neil Selwyn Monash University
Larry Nucci
Larry Nucci University of California, Berkeley
Deanna Kuhn
Deanna Kuhn Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options that align with your career ambitions. Many students seek flexible learning, making online accelerated programs a popular choice. These allow you to earn your bachelor’s degree faster, getting you workforce-ready in less time.

If you’re considering postgraduate work in fields like counseling or organizational psychology, exploring online masters psychology degrees can unlock specialized roles and increase your earning potential. Similarly, those aiming for academic or leadership positions in education can follow the fast lane with edd programs that are both rigorous and streamlined for quicker completion.

For students looking for efficiency, top online masters programs offer the chance to gain advanced qualifications in just one year. These pathways support immediate workforce entry or help advance existing careers. Exploring online programs provides flexibility, cost savings, and a personalized pace, making your journey into Social Sciences and Humanities both accessible and rewarding.

Best Scientists Citing Neil Mercer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles