World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
88
Citations
28436
World Ranking
1206
National Ranking
616

Ronald W. Oppenheim publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald W. Oppenheim sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 250 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Ronald W. Oppenheim D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ronald W. Oppenheim sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ronald W. Oppenheim is affiliated with Wake Forest University in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of medicine, with a specific focus on neurology and genetics.

The scientist's work engages with key topics such as:

  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Oppenheim's recent publications include:

  • Neurovascular unit pathology is observed very early in disease progression in the mutant SOD1G93A mouse model of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, 2022, Experimental Neurology
  • Behavioral development in the absence of neural activity: effects of chronic immobilization on amphibian embryos, 2021, UNC Libraries
  • Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor and Developing Mammalian Motoneurons: Regulation of Programmed Cell Death Among Motoneuron Subtypes, 2021, UNC Libraries

The venues in which these works have appeared are:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Experimental Neurology

Frequent collaborators in Oppenheim's research include:

  • Masaaki Yoshikawa
  • Shin Aizawa
  • Carol Milligan
  • Lanny J. Haverkamp
  • Lucien J. Houenou

Best Publications

  • Cell Death During Development of the Nervous System

    R W Oppenheim

  • Developing motor neurons rescued from programmed and axotomy-induced cell death by GDNF

    Ronald W. Oppenheim;Lucien J. Houenou;James E. Johnson;Leu-Fen H. Lin

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor rescues developing avian motoneurons from cell death

    Ronald W. Oppenheim;Yin Qin-Wei;David Prevette;Qiao Yan

  • Control of embryonic motoneuron survival in vivo by ciliary neurotrophic factor.

    RW Oppenheim;D Prevette;QW Yin;F Collins

  • The neurotrophic theory and naturally occurring motoneuron death.

    Ronald W. Oppenheim

  • Adaptive roles of programmed cell death during nervous system development.

    Robert R. Buss;Woong Sun;Ronald W. Oppenheim

  • Complete dissociation of motor neuron death from motor dysfunction by Bax deletion in a mouse model of ALS.

    Thomas W. Gould;Robert R. Buss;Sharon Vinsant;David Prevette

  • Naturally occurring and induced neuronal death in the chick embryo in vivo requires protein and RNA synthesis: evidence for the role of cell death genes.

    Ronald W. Oppenheim;David Prevette;Michael Tytell;Shunsaku Homma

  • Cell death of motoneurons in the chick embryo spinal cord. I. A light and electron microscopic study of naturally occurring and induced cell loss during development.

    I-Wu Chu-Wang;Ronald W. Oppenheim

  • Rescue of adult mouse motoneurons from injury-induced cell death by glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor.

    Linxi Li;Wutian Wu;Leu-Fen H. Lin;Ming Lei

  • Peptide inhibitors of the ice protease family arrest programmed cell death of motoneurons in vivo and in vitro

    C.E. Milligan;D. Prevette;H. Yaginuma;S. Homma

  • Neurotrophic Survival Molecules for Motoneurons: An Embarrassment of Riches

    Ronald W Oppenheim

  • Naturally occurring cell death during neural development

    Ronald W. Oppenheim

  • Programmed Cell Death in the Developing Nervous System

    Michael J. Burek;Ronald W. Oppenheim

  • Neurotrophic agents prevent motoneuron death following sciatic nerve section in the neonatal mouse.

    Linxi Li;R. W. Oppenheim;Ming Lei;L. J. Houenou

  • Insulin-like growth factors: putative muscle-derived trophic agents that promote motoneuron survival.

    Nicola T. Neff;David Prevette;Lucien J. Houenou;Michael E. Lewis

  • Reduction of naturally occurring motoneuron death in vivo by a target-derived neurotrophic factor

    Ronald W. Oppenheim;Lanny J. Haverkamp;David Prevette;James L. McManaman

  • Programmed Cell Death of Developing Mammalian Neurons after Genetic Deletion of Caspases

    Ronald W. Oppenheim;Richard A. Flavell;Sharon Vinsant;David Prevette

  • Cell death of motoneurons in the chick embryo spinal cord. IV. Evidence that a functional neuromuscular interaction is involved in the regulation of naturally occurring cell death and the stabilization of synapses

    Unknown

  • Cell death of motoneurons in the chick embryo spinal cord. VIII. Motoneurons prevented from dying in the embryo persist after hatching.

    Ronald W. Oppenheim

  • Neuron death in vertebrate development: in vitro methods.

    Peter G.H. Clarke;Ronald W. Oppenheim

Frequent Co-Authors

David Prevette
David Prevette Wake Forest University
Woong Sun
Woong Sun Korea University
Hyun Kim
Hyun Kim Korea University
Wutian Wu
Wutian Wu University of Hong Kong
Kwok-Fai So
Kwok-Fai So University of Hong Kong
Yasuo Uchiyama
Yasuo Uchiyama Juntendo University
Nobuo Okado
Nobuo Okado University of Tsukuba
Christopher S. von Bartheld
Christopher S. von Bartheld University of Nevada Reno
Hermann Rohrer
Hermann Rohrer Goethe University Frankfurt
Michael Sendtner
Michael Sendtner University of Würzburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Ronald W. Oppenheim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles