World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Sendtner

Michael Sendtner

Award Badge
Biology and Biochemistry
Germany
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
104
Citations
54327
World Ranking
1230
National Ranking
79

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
54348
World Ranking
6927
National Ranking
393

Neuroscience

D-Index
104
Citations
54347
World Ranking
658
National Ranking
45

Michael Sendtner publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Sendtner sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 326 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Michael Sendtner D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Sendtner sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Germany Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Biology and Biochemistry in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Michael Sendtner is affiliated with the University of Würzburg in Germany. Their research encompasses multiple fields, predominantly Medicine, Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Neuroscience. Within these main fields, Sendtner's work further specializes in subfields such as Molecular Biology, Neurology, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Genetics, and Cell Biology.

Their research topics include:

  • Neurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
  • RNA Research and Splicing
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Sendtner has contributed to numerous scientific publications across various respected venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • BioEssays
  • Nature Communications
  • Translational Neurodegeneration
  • Neurobiology of Disease

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Sendtner are:

  • Common and rare variant association analyses in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis identify 15 risk loci with distinct genetic architectures and neuron-specific biology, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • Loss of Tdp-43 disrupts the axonal transcriptome of motoneurons accompanied by impaired axonal translation and mitochondria function, 2020, Acta Neuropathologica Communications
  • The FTLD Risk Factor TMEM106B Regulates the Transport of Lysosomes at the Axon Initial Segment of Motoneurons, 2020, Cell Reports
  • Regulation of TrkB cell surface expression-a mechanism for modulation of neuronal responsiveness to brain-derived neurotrophic factor, 2020, Cell and Tissue Research
  • Therapy development for spinal muscular atrophy: perspectives for muscular dystrophies and neurodegenerative disorders, 2022, Neurological Research and Practice

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Sendtner include:

  • Michael Briese
  • Patrick Lüningschrör
  • Sibylle Jablonka
  • Mehri Moradi
  • Abdolhossein Zare

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • A hexanucleotide repeat expansion in C9ORF72 is the cause of chromosome 9p21-linked ALS-FTD

    Alan E. Renton;Elisa Majounie;Adrian James Waite;Javier Simón-Sánchez;Javier Simón-Sánchez

  • Frequency of the C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal dementia: a cross-sectional study

    Elisa Majounie;Alan E. Renton;Kin Mok;Elise G. P. Dopper;Elise G. P. Dopper

  • Ciliary neurotrophic factor prevents the degeneration of motor neurons after axotomy

    Michael Sendtner;Georg W. Kreutzberg;Hans Thoenen

  • Association of transcription factor APRF and protein kinase Jak1 with the interleukin-6 signal transducer gp130.

    Claudia Lütticken;Ursula M. Wegenka;Juping Yuan;Jan Buschmann

  • Ciliary neurotrophic factor

    Piotr Masiakowski;Vivien Wong;Nikos Panayotatos;Hans Friedrich Erwin Thoenen

  • Brain-derived neurotrophic factor prevents the death of motoneurons in newborn rats after nerve section.

    M Sendtner;B Holtmann;R Kolbeck;H Thoenen

  • The human centromeric survival motor neuron gene (SMN2) rescues embryonic lethality in Smn–/– mice and results in a mouse with spinal muscular atrophy

    Umrao R. Monani;Michael Sendtner;Daniel D. Coovert;D. William Parsons

  • Inactivation of the survival motor neuron gene, a candidate gene for human spinal muscular atrophy, leads to massive cell death in early mouse embryos

    Bertold Schrank;Rudolf Götz;Jennifer M. Gunnersen;Janice M. Ure

  • The Notch target genes Hey1 and Hey2 are required for embryonic vascular development

    Andreas Fischer;Nina Schumacher;Manfred Maier;Michael Sendtner

  • Smn, the spinal muscular atrophy–determining gene product, modulates axon growth and localization of β-actin mRNA in growth cones of motoneurons

    Wilfried Rossoll;Sibylle Jablonka;Catia Andreassi;Ann-Kathrin Kröning

  • Na+-D-glucose Cotransporter SGLT1 is Pivotal for Intestinal Glucose-Absorption and Glucose-Dependent Incretin Secretion

    Valentin Gorboulev;Annette Schürmann;Volker Vallon;Helmut Kipp

  • Survival effect of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF) on chick embryonic motoneurons in culture: comparison with other neurotrophic factors and cytokines.

    Yoshihiro Arakawa;Michael Sendtner;Hans Thoenen

  • Disruption of the CNTF gene results in motor neuron degeneration.

    Yasuo Masu;Eckhard Wolf;Bettina Holtmann;Michael Sendtner

  • Molecular cloning, expression and regional distribution of rat ciliary neurotrophic factor

    K. A. Stöckli;F. Lottspeich;M. Sendtner;P. Masiakowski

  • Molecular pathways of motor neuron injury in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Laura Ferraiuolo;Janine Kirby;Andrew J. Grierson;Michael Sendtner

  • Ciliary neurotrophic factor prevents degeneration of motor neurons in mouse mutant progressive motor neuronopathy

    M. Sendtner;H. Schmalbruch;K. A. Stöckli;P. Carroll

  • Genome-wide association analyses identify new risk variants and the genetic architecture of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Wouter van Rheenen;Aleksey Shatunov;Annelot M. Dekker;Russell L. McLaughlin

  • Mutations in the Matrin 3 gene cause familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis

    Janel O Johnson;Erik P Pioro;Ashley Boehringer;Ruth Chia

  • Gene disruption discloses role of selenoprotein P in selenium delivery to target tissues

    Lutz Schomburg;Ulrich Schweizer;Bettina Holtmann;Leopold Flohé

  • The human centromeric survival motor neuron gene (SMN2) rescues embryonic lethality in Smn(-/-) mice and results in a mouse with spinal muscular atrophy (vol 9, pg 333, 2000)

    UR Monani;M Sendtner;DD Coovert;DW Parsons

  • Na + -D-glucose Cotransporter SGLT1 is Pivotal for Intestinal Glucose Absorption and Glucose-Dependent

    Valentin Gorboulev;Annette Schürmann;Volker Vallon;Helmut Kipp

Frequent Co-Authors

Hans Thoenen
Hans Thoenen Max Planck Society
Klaus V. Toyka
Klaus V. Toyka University of Würzburg
Pamela J. Shaw
Pamela J. Shaw University of Sheffield
Adriano Chiò
Adriano Chiò University of Turin
Bryan J. Traynor
Bryan J. Traynor National Institutes of Health
Andrea Calvo
Andrea Calvo University of Turin
Peter M Andersen
Peter M Andersen Umeå University
Karen E. Morrison
Karen E. Morrison University of Southampton
Friedrich Lottspeich
Friedrich Lottspeich Max Planck Society
Thomas Meitinger
Thomas Meitinger Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in neuroscience opens up diverse career paths. Many students complement their studies with related fields such as counseling, therapy, or psychology. If you're considering a broader scope for your education or career, several online degree options align well with neuroscience and mental health professions.

For those interested in becoming licensed counselors, exploring cacrep accredited online counseling programs can be a valuable step. These programs are designed to meet national standards and can be both flexible and affordable.

Cost is a key consideration for many students. Learning about the masters in counseling online cost can help you find programs that fit your budget while providing a quality education.

If you're interested in family dynamics or therapy, accredited mft masters programs offer specialized training in marriage and family therapy, which can pair well with neuroscience for those focusing on behavioral health.

Additionally, a masters in psychology can expand your expertise and career options. Each of these pathways can enhance your understanding of the brain and behavior, providing flexibility for your future career.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Sendtner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles