The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Gender studies, Social psychology, Masculinity, Invisibility and Career development. Her Gender studies research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Disadvantage and Power. Her work carried out in the field of Social psychology brings together such families of science as Higher education and Seekers.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Gender identity and Crew in addition to Seekers. Her study in Masculinity is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Feminization and Femininity. Her Career development study incorporates themes from Information technology, Self-esteem and Competence.
Her scientific interests lie mostly in Gender studies, Social psychology, Public relations, Identity and Masculinity. Her research investigates the connection between Gender studies and topics such as Agency that intersect with issues in Field. Her research integrates issues of Service and Seekers in her study of Social psychology.
Her Public relations research also works with subjects such as
Gender studies, Dirt, Embodied cognition, Social science and Masculinity are her primary areas of study. Her studies deal with areas such as Subjectivity and Agency as well as Gender studies. Her Social science research focuses on Mainstream and how it connects with Qualitative research.
Her Masculinity study combines topics in areas such as Best value, Social psychology, Middle class and Value. Her Social psychology study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Quality, Dismissal and Silence. Her Promotion research focuses on subjects like Glass ceiling, which are linked to Identity.
Ruth Simpson mainly investigates Social science, Gender studies, Ethnography, Power and Social psychology. Ruth Simpson has included themes like Entrepreneurship, Passion, Scale and Media studies in her Social science study. She is involved in the study of Gender studies that focuses on Transnational feminism in particular.
Ethnography combines with fields such as Inclusion, Redress, Taxonomy, Space and The Symbolic in her research. Her Power research incorporates elements of Masculinity, Psychological resilience and Social comparison theory. Many of her research projects under Social psychology are closely connected to Metaphor with Metaphor, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.
Masculinity at Work The Experiences of Men in Female Dominated Occupations
Work, Employment & Society (2004)
Presenteeism, Power and Organizational Change: Long Hours as a Career Barrier and the Impact on the Working Lives of Women Managers
British Journal of Management (1998)
Men in Non‐Traditional Occupations: Career Entry, Career Orientation and Experience of Role Strain
Gender, Work and Organization (2005)
The role of cultural values in understanding the challenges faced by female entrepreneurs in Nigeria
Chima Mordi;Ruth Simpson;Satwinder Singh;Chinonye Okafor.
Gender in Management: An International Journal (2010)
Managing difference in feminized work: Men, otherness and social practice
Alison Pullen;Ruth Simpson.
Human Relations (2009)
25 Years On: Reflecting on the Past and Looking to the Future in Gender and Management Research
Adelina Broadbridge;Ruth Simpson.
British Journal of Management (2011)
Dangerous Work: The Gendered Nature of Bullying in the Context of Higher Education
Ruth Simpson;Claire Cohen.
Gender, Work and Organization (2004)
An investigation of silence and a scrutiny of transparency: Re-examining gender in organization literature through the concepts of voice and visibility
Ruth Simpson;Patricia Lewis.
Human Relations (2005)
Capitalising on learning: an exploration of the MBA as a vehicle for developing career competencies
Jane Sturges;Ruth Simpson;Yochanan Altman.
International Journal of Training and Development (2003)
Kanter Revisited: Gender, Power and (In)Visibility
Patricia Lewis;Ruth Simpson.
International Journal of Management Reviews (2012)
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below: