World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 40 6174 5954 648 621 81 5522

Thomas R. Meagher publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas R. Meagher between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas R. Meagher published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 2.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2021. 3 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2021. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 3 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 5 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 7 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 5 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 4 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 5 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 9 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas R. Meagher: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 3
1981 3
1982 3
1983 2
1984 1
1985 2
1986 2
1987 3
1988 1
1989 2
1990 4
1991 2
1992 5
1993 1
1994 7
1995 0
1996 4
1997 1
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 5
2002 2
2003 6
2004 1
2005 5
2006 0
2007 3
2008 3
2009 0
2010 2
2011 3
2012 1
2013 3
2014 1
2015 4
2016 1
2017 5
2018 1
2019 1
2020 1
2021 9
2022 2
2023 3
2024 2
2025 1
Total 115
Download as CSV

Thomas R. Meagher publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Meagher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 77–81 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 81 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173 81
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas R. Meagher D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas R. Meagher sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280 40
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Thomas R. Meagher is affiliated with the University of St Andrews in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily addresses topics within the social sciences, with a focus on philosophy, political science, and related interdisciplinary studies.

Their work spans several subfields including sociology and political science, philosophy, political science and international relations, experimental and cognitive psychology, and gender studies.

Research topics covered by Meagher emphasize philosophy, ethics, and existentialism, critical theory and philosophy, phenomenology and existential philosophy, Hannah Arendt's political philosophy, political philosophy and ethics, anarchism and radical politics, and the thought of Simone de Beauvoir and Sartre.

Recent papers authored by Thomas R. Meagher include:

  • "The Decolonial Reduction and the Transcendental-Phenomenological Reduction" (2021) published in Philosophy and Global Affairs
  • "Political Service through the Human Sciences: Woodson's Mis-Education of the Negro as Political Philosophy" (2021) published in The Southern Journal of Philosophy
  • "Existential Psychoanalysis and Sociogeny" (2021) published in Sartre Studies International
  • "Daniel S. Milo. Good Enough: The Tolerance for Mediocrity in Nature and Society" (2020) published in Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture
  • "The Spirit of Seriousness and Decolonisation" (2020) published in Alternation Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of the Arts and Humanities in Southern Africa

Meagher's publications have appeared in journals such as Sartre Studies International, Philosophy and Global Affairs, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Evolutionary Studies in Imaginative Culture, and Alternation Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of the Arts and Humanities in Southern Africa.

Best Publications

  • Analysis of Paternity within a Natural Population of Chamaelirium luteum. 1. Identification of Most-Likely Male Parents

    Thomas R. Meagher

  • Green Plants in the Red: A Baseline Global Assessment for the IUCN Sampled Red List Index for Plants

    Neil A. Brummitt;Steven P. Bachman;Janine Griffiths-Lee;Maiko Lutz

  • Mate availability in small populations of plant species with homomorphic sporophytic self-incompatibility

    Diane L Byers;Thomas R Meagher

  • Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity.

    R Chakraborty;T R Meagher;P E Smouse

  • Toward monitoring global biodiversity

    Jonathan E. M. Baillie;Ben Collen;Rajan Amin;H. Resit Akcakaya

  • The relationship between single parent and parent pair genetic likelihoods in genealogy reconstruction

    Thomas R. Meagher;Elizabeth Thompson

  • Analysis of Parentage for Naturally Established Seedlings of Chamaelirium Luteum (Liliaceae)

    Thomas R. Meagher;Elizabeth Thompson

  • How many herbarium specimens are needed to detect threatened species

    Malin C. Rivers;Malin C. Rivers;Lin Taylor;Neil A. Brummitt;Thomas R. Meagher

  • THE QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN SILENE LATIFOLIA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE). I. GENETIC VARIATION.

    Thomas R. Meagher

  • Sexual Dimorphism Masks Life History Trade-Offs in the Dioecious Plant Silene Latifolia

    Lynda F. Delph;Thomas R. Meagher

  • The Population Biology of Chamaelirium Luteum, A Dioecious Member of the Lily Family: Life History Studies

    Unknown

  • Determination of ploidy level and nuclear DNA content in blueberry by flow cytometry.

    D. E. Costich;Rodomiro Ortiz;T. R. Meagher;Leo P. Bruederle

  • Genetic analysis of male reproductive contributions in Chamaelirium luteum (L.) gray (Liliaceae).

    P E Smouse;T R Meagher

  • A COMPARISON OF DEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS IN A RARE AND A COMMON SPECIES OF EUPATORIUM

    Diane L. Byers;Thomas R. Meagher

  • Subpopulations, locations and fragmentation: applying IUCN red list criteria to herbarium specimen data

    Malin C. Rivers;Malin C. Rivers;Steven P. Bachman;Thomas R. Meagher;Eimear Nic Lughadha

  • Sex Allocation and Reproductive Success in the Andromonoecious Perennial Solanum carolinense (Solanaceae). II. Paternity and Functional Gender.

    Elizabeth Elle;Thomas R. Meagher

  • Plant Biodiversity Drivers in Brazilian Campos Rupestres: Insights from Phylogenetic Structure.

    Daniela C. Zappi;Marcelo Freire Moro;Thomas R. Meagher;Eimear Nic Lughadha

  • The Role of Edaphic Environment and Climate in Structuring Phylogenetic Pattern in Seasonally Dry Tropical Plant Communities

    Marcelo Freire Moro;Igor Aurélio Silva;Francisca Soares de Araújo;Eimear NIc Lughadha

  • Measuring the fate of plant diversity: towards a foundation for future monitoring and opportunities for urgent action

    E Nic Lughadha;J Baillie;W Barthlott;N.A Brummitt

  • Selection on floral characters in natural Spanish populations of Silene latifolia

    J. W. Wright;T. R. Meagher

  • POPULATION BIOLOGY OF CHAMAELIRIUM LUTEUM, A DIOECIOUS LILY. II. MECHANISMS GOVERNING SEX RATIOS

    Thomas R. Meagher

  • Analysis of paternity within a natural population of Chamaelirium luteum. II. Patterns of male reproductive success.

    Thomas R. Meagher

  • THE QUANTITATIVE GENETICS OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN SILENE LATIFOLIA (CARYOPHYLLACEAE). II. RESPONSE TO SEX-SPECIFIC SELECTION.

    Thomas R. Meagher

  • Evolution — An Introduction

    Thomas R Meagher

Frequent Co-Authors

Eimear Nic Lughadha
Eimear Nic Lughadha Royal Botanic Gardens
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern University of California, Santa Barbara
Faith C. Belanger
Faith C. Belanger Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Marten Winter
Marten Winter Leipzig University
Jill S. Baron
Jill S. Baron United States Geological Survey
Craig Hilton-Taylor
Craig Hilton-Taylor IUCN Red List
Douglas J. Futuyma
Douglas J. Futuyma Stony Brook University
Peter E. Smouse
Peter E. Smouse Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Martin Lascoux
Martin Lascoux Uppsala University
Lynda F. Delph
Lynda F. Delph Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the fields of ecology and evolution continue to expand, students may also consider parallel online degree options to broaden their career prospects. Many healthcare and science-related programs now offer fast-track online degrees for those looking to advance quickly.

For example, individuals seeking advancement in nursing can explore a 6-month rn to bsn program online, which enables registered nurses to earn a BSN in less time. Alternatively, those holding an associate degree in nursing might consider an asn to np pathway, bridging into nurse practitioner roles.

Non-nursing graduates interested in healthcare can look into direct entry msn programs online designed for rapid transition. When comparing online programs, it’s essential to research factors like program structure, accreditation, and flexibility. Resources such as the comparison of capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn can help students make informed decisions.

Exploring online degrees in science-related fields provides new avenues for career growth and allows greater flexibility to study while working.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas R. Meagher

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles