World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
78381
World Ranking
10493
National Ranking
4553

Peter E. Smouse publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter E. Smouse sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 168 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Peter E. Smouse D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter E. Smouse sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter E. Smouse is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within agricultural and biological sciences, with a focused contribution to biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology.

Their recent scholarly work includes publications addressing genetic diversity and population structure within plant species. Notable papers are:

  • Genetic diversity within and across gametophytic ploidy levels in a Sphagnum cryptic species complex (2020), published in the Australian Journal of Botany
  • Population structure within the Hard Maple complex (2021), published in the Canadian Journal of Forest Research

The research addresses several main topics, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to plant sciences and ecology:

  • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Bryophyte Studies and Records
  • Lichen and fungal ecology
  • Plant-Derived Bioactive Compounds
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
  • Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

In terms of academic disciplines, their work engages with these primary fields of study:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

They also contribute to several interconnected subfields, including:

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Plant Science
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Cell Biology
  • Molecular Biology

The scientist collaborates regularly with a group of coauthors, reflecting a networked research environment. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Eric F. Karlin
  • Sean Robinson
  • Whitney A. Jackson
  • Josh A. Honig
  • Jason Grabosky

Peter E. Smouse's work has been published primarily in journals focused on botany and forestry, including:

  • Australian Journal of Botany
  • Canadian Journal of Forest Research

Best Publications

  • genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research

    Rodney Peakall;Peter E Smouse

  • Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data.

    L. Excoffier;Peter Smouse;J. M. Quattro

  • GenAlEx 6.5

    Rod Peakall;Peter E. Smouse

  • A movement ecology paradigm for unifying organismal movement research

    Ran Nathan;Wayne M. Getz;Eloy Revilla;Marcel Holyoak

  • Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the mantel test of matrix correspondence

    Peter E. Smouse;Jeffrey C. Long;Robert R. Sokal

  • Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure.

    Peter E. Smouse;Rod Peakall

  • RAPD variation within and among natural populations of outcrossing buffalograss [Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.]

    David Robert Huff;R. Peakall;R. Peakall;P. E. Smouse

  • The Carroll rating scale for depression. I. Development, reliability and validation.

    Bernard J. Carroll;Michael Feinberg;Peter E. Smouse;Sarah G. Rawson

  • Evolutionary implications of allozyme and RAPD variation in diploid populations of dioecious buffalograss Buchloë dactyloides

    R. Peakall;R. Peakall;P. E. Smouse;David Robert Huff

  • Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree populations

    Victoria L. Sork;Peter E. Smouse

  • Using genetic markers to estimate the pollen dispersal curve

    Frederic Austerlitz;Christopher W. Dick;Cyril Dutech;Cyril Dutech;Etienne K. Klein;Etienne K. Klein

  • Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. I. Male gamete heterogeneity among females

    Peter E. Smouse;Rodney J. Dyer;Robert D. Westfall;Victoria L. Sork

  • Stochastic modelling of animal movement

    Peter E. Smouse;Stefano Focardi;Paul R. Moorcroft;John G. Kie

  • Pollen movement in declining populations of California Valley oak, Quercus lobata: where have all the fathers gone?

    V. L. Sork;F. W. Davis;P. E. Smouse;V. J. Apsit

  • Measuring pollen flow in forest trees: an exposition of alternative approaches

    Peter E Smouse;Victoria L Sork

  • Parentage analysis with genetic markers in natural populations. I. The expected proportion of offspring with unambiguous paternity.

    R Chakraborty;T R Meagher;P E Smouse

  • Matrix correlation analysis in anthropology and genetics

    Peter E. Smouse;Jeffrey C. Long;Jeffrey C. Long

  • A heterogeneity test for fine-scale genetic structure.

    Peter E Smouse;Rodney Peakall;Eva Gonzales

  • Developing a broader scientific foundation for river restoration: Columbia River food webs.

    Robert J. Naiman;Robert J. Naiman;J. Richard Alldredge;David A. Beauchamp;Peter A. Bisson

  • Two-generation analysis of pollen flow across a landscape. II. Relation between phi(ft), pollen dispersal and interfemale distance.

    Frédéric Austerlitz;Frédéric Austerlitz;Peter E. Smouse

Frequent Co-Authors

Victoria L. Sork
Victoria L. Sork University of California, Los Angeles
James V. Neel
James V. Neel University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Kenneth M. Weiss
Kenneth M. Weiss Pennsylvania State University
Frédéric Austerlitz
Frédéric Austerlitz Université Paris Cité
Jeffrey C. Long
Jeffrey C. Long University of New Mexico
James L. Hamrick
James L. Hamrick University of Georgia
Ranajit Chakraborty
Ranajit Chakraborty University of North Texas Health Science Center
Bernard J. Carroll
Bernard J. Carroll Duke University
Bruce E. Rieman
Bruce E. Rieman US Forest Service
Nancy J. Huntly
Nancy J. Huntly Utah State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens diverse avenues in healthcare, research, and applied sciences. Many students opt to specialize further or enter the workforce by pursuing related online degrees. For those seeking fast-track options, accelerated radiology tech programs online offer an efficient route into diagnostic imaging careers with strong job prospects.

Another popular pathway is through allied health professions, notably medical assistance. Accredited options like online medical assistant programs fafsa approved make entry-level healthcare roles accessible and affordable. For those already certified, an ma to lpn bridge program online is an excellent way to advance your credentials and responsibilities in clinical settings.

For students interested in nutrition and patient wellness, exploring the top dietetics programs in the us can lead to rewarding work impacting public health. All these options help biology and biochemistry graduates leverage their scientific background into fulfilling, high-demand professions.

Best Scientists Citing Peter E. Smouse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles