World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
4985
World Ranking
8609
National Ranking
3661

Thomas Maloney publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Maloney sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 71 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Thomas Maloney D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Maloney sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Thomas Maloney is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with notable contributions in Cognitive Neuroscience, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health.

Their work has involved specialized topics including:

  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Pediatric Pain Management Techniques
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Thomas Maloney are:

  • Reduced gray matter volume and cortical thickness associated with traffic-related air pollution in a longitudinally studied pediatric cohort, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Automated grading of enlarged perivascular spaces in clinical imaging data of an acute stroke cohort using an interpretable, 3D deep learning framework, 2022, Scientific Reports
  • Examining reaction time variability on the stop-signal task in the ABCD study, 2022, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Processing of pain by the developing brain: evidence of differences between adolescent and adult females, 2022, Pain
  • Brain Structural Changes During Juvenile Fibromyalgia: Relationships With Pain, Fatigue, and Functional Disability, 2022, Arthritis & Rheumatology

Frequent co-authors in Thomas Maloney's publications include:

  • Vivek Khandwala
  • Brady J. Williamson
  • Achala Vagal
  • Jennifer Vannest
  • Pooja Khatri

Their work is regularly published in venues such as Stroke, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, Pain, and Brain Imaging and Behavior.

Best Publications

  • Role of the anterior cingulate and medial orbitofrontal cortex in processing drug cues in cocaine addiction.

    Rita Z. Goldstein;Dardo Tomasi;Suparna Rajaram;Lisa A. Cottone

  • Is decreased prefrontal cortical sensitivity to monetary reward associated with impaired motivation and self-control in cocaine addiction?

    Rita Z. Goldstein;Nelly Alia-Klein;Dardo Tomasi;Lei Zhang

  • The Neuropsychology of Cocaine Addiction: Recent Cocaine Use Masks Impairment

    Patricia A Woicik;Scott J Moeller;Nelly Alia-Klein;Thomas Maloney

  • Anterior cingulate cortex hypoactivations to an emotionally salient task in cocaine addiction

    Rita Z. Goldstein;Nelly Alia-Klein;Dardo Tomasi;Jean Honorio Carrillo

  • The effect of graded monetary reward on cognitive event-related potentials and behavior in young healthy adults

    Rita Z. Goldstein;Lisa A. Cottone;Zhiru Jia;Thomas Maloney

  • Motivated attention to cocaine and emotional cues in abstinent and current cocaine users – an ERP study

    Jonathan P. Dunning;Muhammad A. Parvaz;Muhammad A. Parvaz;Greg Hajcak;Thomas Maloney

  • Widespread disruption in brain activation patterns to a working memory task during cocaine abstinence.

    D. Tomasi;R.Z. Goldstein;F. Telang;T. Maloney

  • Sigma (12-15 Hz) and delta (0.3-3 Hz) EEG oscillate reciprocally within NREM sleep.

    S. Uchida;T. Maloney;J.D. March;R. Azari

  • Oral methylphenidate normalizes cingulate activity in cocaine addiction during a salient cognitive task

    Rita Z. Goldstein;Patricia A. Woicik;Thomas Maloney;Dardo Tomasi

  • Disrupted functional connectivity with dopaminergic midbrain in cocaine abusers.

    Dardo Tomasi;Nora D. Volkow;Nora D. Volkow;Ruiliang Wang;Jean H. Carrillo;Jean H. Carrillo

  • Cognitive and behavioral outcomes in benign childhood epilepsy with centrotemporal spikes

    Jennifer Vannest;Jeffrey R. Tenney;Rose Gelineau-Morel;Thomas Maloney

  • Dopaminergic Response to Drug Words in Cocaine Addiction

    Rita Z. Goldstein;Dardo Tomasi;Nelly Alia-Klein;Jean Honorio Carrillo

  • Gene x disease interaction on orbitofrontal gray matter in cocaine addiction.

    Nelly Alia-Klein;Muhammad A. Parvaz;Patricia A. Woicik;Anna B. Konova

  • Enhanced choice for viewing cocaine pictures in cocaine addiction.

    Scott J. Moeller;Thomas Maloney;Muhammad A. Parvaz;Jonathan P. Dunning;Jonathan P. Dunning

  • Beta (20-28 Hz) and delta (0.3-3 Hz) EEGs oscillate reciprocally across NREM and REM sleep.

    Sunao Uchida;Tom Maloney;Irwin Feinberg

  • Thalamo-cortical dysfunction in cocaine abusers: implications in attention and perception.

    Dardo Tomasi;Rita Z. Goldstein;Frank Telang;Thomas Maloney

  • Impaired insight in cocaine addiction: laboratory evidence and effects on cocaine-seeking behaviour

    Scott J. Moeller;Thomas Maloney;Muhammad A. Parvaz;Muhammad A. Parvaz;Nelly Alia-Klein

  • Impaired Neural Response to Negative Prediction Errors in Cocaine Addiction

    Muhammad A. Parvaz;Anna B. Konova;Greg H. Proudfit;Jonathan P. Dunning

  • Repeat variation in the human PER2 gene as a new genetic marker associated with cocaine addiction and brain dopamine D2 receptor availability.

    Shumay E;Fowler Js;Wang Gj;Logan J

  • Clinical and neural responses to cognitive behavioral therapy for functional tremor.

    Alberto J. Espay;Scott Ries;Thomas Maloney;Jennifer Vannest

  • Precise conservation of NREM period 1 (NREMP1) delta across naps and nocturnal sleep: implications for REM latency and NREM/REM alternation.

    I Feinberg;T Maloney;J D March

Frequent Co-Authors

Nora D. Volkow
Nora D. Volkow National Institutes of Health
Rita Z. Goldstein
Rita Z. Goldstein Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Nelly Alia-Klein
Nelly Alia-Klein Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Frank Telang
Frank Telang National Institutes of Health
Gene-Jack Wang
Gene-Jack Wang National Institutes of Health
Dardo Tomasi
Dardo Tomasi National Institutes of Health
Irwin Feinberg
Irwin Feinberg University of California, Davis
Scott J. Moeller
Scott J. Moeller Stony Brook University
Joanna S. Fowler
Joanna S. Fowler Brookhaven National Laboratory
Greg Hajcak
Greg Hajcak Santa Clara University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often leads students to consider a range of related fields and online degrees that blend scientific, clinical, and therapeutic knowledge. Popular pathways include psychology, therapy, and social work, each offering unique opportunities and flexible online options.

A psychology degree online is a practical choice for those interested in human behavior and cognitive processes. Many continue on to pursue a masters of psychology online, deepening expertise for research or clinical roles.

For those drawn to counseling families and couples, an lmft degree (Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist) offers specialized training for therapeutic practice and licensure.

Alternatively, a masters in social work provides broad skills in supporting individuals and communities, ideal for diverse social services careers.

These degree pathways can enhance or complement neuroscience studies, allowing graduates to pursue careers in clinical settings, research institutions, or community-based roles.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Maloney

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles