World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 78 1753 1596 849 755 133 24417

Frank Telang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frank Telang between 1985 and 2016, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frank Telang published across 32 years, from 1985 to 2016, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2009. 3 of the 134 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2016. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2009. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 7 publications 2007: 17 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 19 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 1 publication
1985 2016

134 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frank Telang: publications per year, 1985 to 2016
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 4
2000 5
2001 2
2002 2
2003 4
2004 5
2005 1
2006 7
2007 17
2008 14
2009 19
2010 18
2011 15
2012 9
2013 4
2014 3
2015 2
2016 1
Total 134
Download as CSV

Frank Telang publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Telang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 133 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469 133
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Frank Telang D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Telang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146 78
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Frank Telang is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their professional profile highlights a connection to a prominent government research institution involved in biomedical and public health studies.

Details regarding specific research topics, main fields of study, subfields, and recurring themes in their work are not documented in the available source data. There is no information on published papers, including titles, publication years, or venues, which limits insight into their exact research contributions and areas of expertise.

The record does not list any frequent collaborators or co-authors, indicating either independent work or the lack of documented partnership data in the source.

There are no book publications or publishers associated with Frank Telang in the provided data, thus no further context on extended written contributions such as monographs or edited volumes.

Information on awards or distinctions has not been included, so it is not possible to identify any official recognitions or honors received during their career.

Frank Telang is currently living according to the given data.

Best Publications

  • Cocaine cues and dopamine in dorsal striatum: mechanism of craving in cocaine addiction.

    Nora D Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Frank Telang;Joanna S Fowler

  • Addiction: Beyond dopamine reward circuitry

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Joanna S. Fowler;Dardo Tomasi

  • Imaging dopamine's role in drug abuse and addiction.

    N.D. Volkow;J.S. Fowler;G.J. Wang;R. Baler

  • Overlapping neuronal circuits in addiction and obesity: evidence of systems pathology

    Nora D Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Joanna S Fowler;Frank Telang

  • Evaluating Dopamine Reward Pathway in ADHD: Clinical Implications

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Scott H. Kollins;Tim L. Wigal

  • Dopamine in drug abuse and addiction: results of imaging studies and treatment implications.

    Nora D. Volkow;Joanna S. Fowler;Gene-Jack Wang;James M. Swanson

  • Low dopamine striatal D2 receptors are associated with prefrontal metabolism in obese subjects: possible contributing factors.

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Frank Telang;Joanna S. Fowler

  • Profound Decreases in Dopamine Release in Striatum in Detoxified Alcoholics: Possible Orbitofrontal Involvement

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Frank Telang;Joanna S. Fowler

  • Addiction: decreased reward sensitivity and increased expectation sensitivity conspire to overwhelm the brain's control circuit.

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Joanna S. Fowler;Dardo Tomasi

  • Effects of Modafinil on Dopamine and Dopamine Transporters in the Male Human Brain: Clinical Implications

    Nora D. Volkow;Joanna S. Fowler;Jean Logan;David Alexoff

  • Motivation deficit in ADHD is associated with dysfunction of the dopamine reward pathway

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Gene-Jack Wang;Jeffrey H. Newcorn;Scott H. Kollins

  • Exposure to appetitive food stimuli markedly activates the human brain

    Gene-Jack Wang;Nora D Volkow;Frank Telang;Millard Jayne

  • Depressed Dopamine Activity in Caudate and Preliminary Evidence of Limbic Involvement in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Jeffrey Newcorn;Frank Telang

  • Inverse Association Between BMI and Prefrontal Metabolic Activity in Healthy Adults

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Frank Telang;Joanna S. Fowler

  • High Levels of Dopamine D2 Receptors in Unaffected Members of Alcoholic Families: Possible Protective Factors

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Henri Begleiter;Bernice Porjesz

  • Cognitive Control of Drug Craving Inhibits Brain Reward Regions in Cocaine Abusers

    Nora D. Volkow;Joanna S. Fowler;Gene-Jack Wang;Frank Telang

  • Evidence that Methylphenidate enhances the saliency of a mathematical task by increasing dopamine in the human brain

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Joanna S. Fowler;Frank Telang

  • Expectation Enhances the Regional Brain Metabolic and the Reinforcing Effects of Stimulants in Cocaine Abusers

    Nora D. Volkow;Gene-Jack Wang;Yemin Ma;Joanna S. Fowler

  • Enhanced Striatal Dopamine Release During Food Stimulation in Binge Eating Disorder

    Gene-Jack Wang;Allan Geliebter;Nora D. Volkow;Nora D. Volkow;Frank W. Telang

  • Gastric distention activates satiety circuitry in the human brain

    Gene-Jack Wang;Dardo Tomasi;Walter Backus;Ruiliang Wang

Frequent Co-Authors

Nora D. Volkow
Nora D. Volkow National Institutes of Health
Joanna S. Fowler
Joanna S. Fowler Brookhaven National Laboratory
Gene-Jack Wang
Gene-Jack Wang National Institutes of Health
Jean Logan
Jean Logan New York University
Dardo Tomasi
Dardo Tomasi National Institutes of Health
Rita Z. Goldstein
Rita Z. Goldstein Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Nelly Alia-Klein
Nelly Alia-Klein Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Thomas Maloney
Thomas Maloney Cornell University
James M. Swanson
James M. Swanson University of California, Irvine
Yu-Shin Ding
Yu-Shin Ding New York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience opens up a range of online education and career opportunities in the USA. Many students interested in brain science or mental health consider advanced clinical pathways, such as online psyd programs. These programs prepare you for research and clinical roles in psychology, often leading to professional licensure.

For those focused on therapy and family dynamics, mft programs online offer a streamlined route to become a licensed marriage and family therapist. These programs are designed for faster completion, making it easier to balance study with other commitments.

Undergraduate students can benefit from accelerated bachelor's degree options. These intensive programs allow you to earn your degree in less time, jump-starting your career in neuroscience or a related field.

As you plan your future, it's also important to consider earning potential. Certain STEM and health-related majors, highlighted among top paying degrees, can significantly improve job prospects and long-term financial outcomes.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Telang

Recently Published Articles