What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Internal medicine
- Psychiatry
- Disease
Mark S. Gold mainly focuses on Addiction, Psychiatry, Internal medicine, Neuroscience and Endocrinology.
His Addiction study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Overeating, Dopamine and Brain stimulation reward.
In his research, Pharmacology, Anesthesia and Cocaine abuse is intimately related to Bromocriptine, which falls under the overarching field of Dopamine.
His Psychiatry research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Clinical psychology and Public health.
His Neuroscience study deals with Methamphetamine intersecting with Neurotoxicity.
His study in Substance abuse is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Neurochemical, Family medicine and Opioid.
His most cited work include:
- CLONIDINE BLOCKS ACUTE OPIATE-WITHDRAWAL SYMPTOMS (626 citations)
- New concepts in cocaine addiction: The dopamine depletion hypothesis (521 citations)
- Problematic internet use: proposed classification and diagnostic criteria. (487 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Psychiatry, Addiction, Internal medicine, Substance abuse and Endocrinology.
His work deals with themes such as Overeating and Clinical psychology, which intersect with Psychiatry.
His Addiction study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Dopaminergic, Dopamine and Brain stimulation reward.
As a part of the same scientific study, he usually deals with the Dopamine, concentrating on Pharmacology and frequently concerns with Anesthesia.
His research in Anesthesia focuses on subjects like Opiate, which are connected to Clonidine.
His Internal medicine study frequently links to other fields, such as Depression.
He most often published in these fields:
- Psychiatry (40.79%)
- Addiction (32.40%)
- Internal medicine (15.13%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?
- Addiction (32.40%)
- Psychiatry (40.79%)
- Neuroscience (10.03%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary scientific interests are in Addiction, Psychiatry, Neuroscience, Dopamine and Dopaminergic.
Mark S. Gold works in the field of Addiction, focusing on Food addiction in particular.
His research on Psychiatry often connects related topics like Medical prescription.
In his study, Opioid and Epigenetics is inextricably linked to Bioinformatics, which falls within the broad field of Dopamine.
Mark S. Gold combines subjects such as Pharmacology and Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder with his study of Dopaminergic.
His study looks at the intersection of Nucleus accumbens and topics like Functional magnetic resonance imaging with Internal medicine.
Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Hormonal and neural mechanisms of food reward, eating behaviour and obesity (171 citations)
- Dopamine and glucose, obesity, and reward deficiency syndrome (103 citations)
- Genetic Addiction Risk Score (GARS): Molecular Neurogenetic Evidence for Predisposition to Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS) (92 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Internal medicine
- Psychiatry
- Disease
His scientific interests lie mostly in Addiction, Neuroscience, Brain stimulation reward, Substance abuse and Psychiatry.
He studies Addiction, namely Food addiction.
His Brain stimulation reward research includes elements of Functional magnetic resonance imaging and Neurogenetics.
Mark S. Gold has included themes like Medical prescription, Abstinence and Genetic testing in his Substance abuse study.
His work investigates the relationship between Abstinence and topics such as Internal medicine that intersect with problems in Recreational drug use.
His work on Depression as part of general Psychiatry study is frequently connected to Lucid dream, therefore bridging the gap between diverse disciplines of science and establishing a new relationship between them.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
