World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6704 6246 3635 3303 127 8148

Lisa J. Merlo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa J. Merlo between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa J. Merlo published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 5.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2008. 12 of the 154 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2008. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 21 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 7 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
2000 2025

154 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa J. Merlo: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 1
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 4
2007 16
2008 21
2009 14
2010 9
2011 6
2012 6
2013 7
2014 9
2015 0
2016 8
2017 1
2018 3
2019 1
2020 7
2021 12
2022 8
2023 5
2024 5
2025 7
Total 154
Download as CSV

Lisa J. Merlo publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa J. Merlo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–130 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670 127
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa J. Merlo D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa J. Merlo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 45
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa J. Merlo is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States, focusing their research primarily in the fields of Medicine and Health Professions. Their work encompasses various subfields including General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Epidemiology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
  • Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Cardiovascular Effects of Exercise
  • Electronic Health Records Systems

Merlo has contributed notably to several peer-reviewed journals. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Journal of Addiction Medicine
  • Journal of Addictive Diseases
  • European Heart Journal Supplements
  • American Journal on Addictions

Some selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Merlo are:

  • "A systematic review of contributing factors of and solutions to electronic health record-related impacts on physician well-being" (2020), Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • "Systematic Review and Meta-analysis: An Empirical Approach to Defining Treatment Response and Remission in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder" (2021), Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • "Factors associated with nurse well-being in relation to electronic health record use: A systematic review" (2020), Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • "Promoting Resilience in Medicine: The Effects of a Mind-Body Medicine Elective to Improve Medical Student Well-being" (2020), Global Advances in Health and Medicine
  • "Primary care physicians' electronic health record proficiency and efficiency behaviors and time interacting with electronic health records: a quantile regression analysis" (2021), Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Frequent collaborators in research include:

  • Oliver T. Nguyen
  • Kea Turner
  • Michelle Williams
  • Sue S. Feldman
  • Karim Hanna

Best Publications

  • In their own words: stressors facing medical students in the millennial generation.

    Monica R. Hill;Shelby Goicochea;Lisa J. Merlo

  • Family-based cognitive-behavioral therapy for pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: comparison of intensive and weekly approaches.

    Eric A. Storch;Gary R. Geffken;Lisa J. Merlo;Giselle Mann

  • Family accommodation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Eric A Storch;Gary R Geffken;Lisa J Merlo;Marni L Jacob

  • Clinical predictors of response to cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Mary L. Keeley;Eric A. Storch;Lisa J. Merlo;Gary R. Geffken

  • Impact of comorbidity on cognitive-behavioral therapy response in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Eric A. Storch;Lisa J. Merlo;Michael J. Larson;Gary R. Geffken

  • Decreased Family Accommodation Associated with Improved Therapy Outcome in Pediatric Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder.

    Lisa J. Merlo;Heather D. Lehmkuhl;Gary R. Geffken;Eric A. Storch

  • What Is the Evidence for “Food Addiction?” A Systematic Review

    Eliza L. Gordon;Aviva H. Ariel-Donges;Viviana Bauman;Lisa J. Merlo

  • Measuring Problematic Mobile Phone Use: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties of the PUMP Scale

    Lisa J. Merlo;Amanda M. Stone;Alex Bibbey

  • D-cycloserine does not enhance exposure-response prevention therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Eric A. Storch;Lisa J. Merlo;Michael Bengtson;Tanya K. Murphy

  • Quality of life in youth with Tourette's syndrome and chronic tic disorder.

    Eric A. Storch;Lisa J. Merlo;Caleb Lack;Vanessa A. Milsom

  • Florida Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory: development, reliability, and validity.

    Eric A. Storch;Daniel Bagner;Lisa J. Merlo;Nathan Andrew Shapira

  • Setting the standard for recovery: Physicians' Health Programs

    Robert L. DuPont;A. Thomas McLellan;William L. White;Lisa J. Merlo

  • Assessment of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a review

    Kristen Grabill;Lisa Merlo;Danny Duke;Kelli Lee Harford

  • Clinical features of children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder and hoarding symptoms.

    Eric A. Storch;Caleb W. Lack;Lisa J. Merlo;Gary R. Geffken

  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Plus Motivational Interviewing Improves Outcome for Pediatric Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: A Preliminary Study

    Lisa J. Merlo;Eric A. Storch;Heather D. Lehmkuhl;Marni L. Jacob

  • Children's Florida Obsessive Compulsive Inventory: psychometric properties and feasibility of a self-report measure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms in youth.

    Eric A. Storch;Muniya Khanna;Lisa J. Merlo;Benjamin A. Loew

  • PATHOS: a brief screening application for assessing sexual addiction.

    Patrick J. Carnes;Bradley A. Green;Lisa J. Merlo;Alexis Polles

  • Reasons for misuse of prescription medication among physicians undergoing monitoring by a physician health program.

    Lisa J. Merlo;Supachoke Singhakant;Simone M. Cummings;Linda B. Cottler

  • Cognitive-behavioral therapy for PANDAS-related obsessive-compulsive disorder: findings from a preliminary waitlist controlled open trial.

    Eric A. Storch;Tanya K. Murphy;Gary R. Geffken;Giselle Mann

  • Prescription opioid abuse and dependence among physicians: hypotheses and treatment.

    Lisa J. Merlo;Mark S. Gold

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric A. Storch
Eric A. Storch Baylor College of Medicine
Gary R. Geffken
Gary R. Geffken University of Florida
Mark S. Gold
Mark S. Gold Washington University in St. Louis
Tanya K. Murphy
Tanya K. Murphy University of South Florida
Wayne K. Goodman
Wayne K. Goodman Baylor College of Medicine
Michael J. Larson
Michael J. Larson Brigham Young University
Linda B. Cottler
Linda B. Cottler University of Florida
Adam B. Lewin
Adam B. Lewin University of South Florida
Sara Jo Nixon
Sara Jo Nixon University of Florida
A. Thomas McLellan
A. Thomas McLellan University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career pathways, especially in fields like social work, counseling, and therapy. Many students choose to pursue social work degrees as a natural extension of their psychology studies. This field offers diverse roles, from case management to clinical social work, and the flexibility to specialize in areas such as child welfare or mental health.

Cost is often a major factor when selecting a program. If affordability is a priority, you may want to explore the cheapest social work programs in Maryland or the cheapest social work programs in Michigan. These programs offer accredited online options that can be particularly helpful for those balancing work and study.

Students in other regions can consider the cheapest social work programs in Minneapolis. For those in the South, the cheapest social work degrees in Mississippi provide affordable entry points into this rewarding field.

Exploring online degrees in social work and psychology not only prepares you for direct patient care but also for roles in advocacy, research, and education, making them versatile paths for your career.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa J. Merlo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles