World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
59
Citations
10266
World Ranking
3752
National Ranking
2099

Michael J. Larson publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Larson sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 166 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Michael J. Larson D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael J. Larson sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael J. Larson is affiliated with Brigham Young University in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a strong focus on neuroscience, medicine, and psychology. Within these broad fields, they have contributed extensively to cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, epidemiology, clinical psychology, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their publication record includes significant contributions to topics such as neural and behavioral psychology studies, traumatic brain injury research, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, behavioral health and interventions, heart rate variability and autonomic control, functional brain connectivity studies, and areas covering anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, and cognitive processes.

Michael J. Larson has published in a variety of academic journals, with repeated appearances in the following venues:

  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Psychophysiology
  • Brain Injury
  • NeuroImage
  • Appetite

Frequent collaborators include Kaylie A. Carbine, Peter E. Clayson, Scott A. Baldwin, James D. LeCheminant, and Alexandra M. Muir. These collaborations suggest ongoing work across interdisciplinary teams with overlapping interests in psychophysiology and brain-related research.

Representative recent papers by Michael J. Larson include:

  • The data-processing multiverse of event-related potentials (ERPs): A roadmap for the optimization and standardization of ERP processing and reduction pipelines, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Evaluating the internal consistency of subtraction-based and residualized difference scores: Considerations for psychometric reliability analyses of event-related potentials, 2021, Psychophysiology
  • A registered report of error-related negativity and reward positivity as biomarkers of depression: P-Curving the evidence, 2020, International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Using generalizability theory and the ERP Reliability Analysis (ERA) Toolbox for assessing test-retest reliability of ERP scores part 1: Algorithms, framework, and implementation, 2021, International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • The open access advantage for studies of human electrophysiology: Impact on citations and Altmetrics, 2021, International Journal of Psychophysiology

Best Publications

  • Making sense of all the conflict: a theoretical review and critique of conflict-related ERPs.

    Michael J. Larson;Peter E. Clayson;Ann Clawson

  • Family accommodation in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Eric A Storch;Gary R Geffken;Lisa J Merlo;Marni L Jacob

  • Impact of comorbidity on cognitive-behavioral therapy response in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Eric A. Storch;Lisa J. Merlo;Michael J. Larson;Gary R. Geffken

  • Multiple Pathways to Functional Impairment in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Yeraz Markarian;Michael J. Larson;Mirela A. Aldea;Scott A. Baldwin

  • Development and psychometric evaluation of the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale--Second Edition.

    Eric A. Storch;Steven A. Rasmussen;Lawrence H. Price;Michael J. Larson

  • How does noise affect amplitude and latency measurement of event‐related potentials (ERPs)? A methodological critique and simulation study

    Peter E. Clayson;Scott A. Baldwin;Michael J. Larson

  • Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.

    Michael J. Larson;David A.S. Kaufman;William M. Perlstein

  • Preliminary investigation of web-camera delivered cognitive-behavioral therapy for youth with obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Eric A. Storch;Nicole E. Caporino;Jessica R. Morgan;Adam B. Lewin

  • Acculturation to Western Society as a Risk Factor for High Blood Pressure: A Meta-Analytic Review

    Patrick R Steffen;Timothy B Smith;Michael Larson;Leon Butler

  • Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.

    Peter E. Clayson;Michael J. Larson

  • D-cycloserine does not enhance exposure-response prevention therapy in obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Eric A. Storch;Lisa J. Merlo;Michael Bengtson;Tanya K. Murphy

  • Parametric manipulation of working memory load in traumatic brain injury: behavioral and neural correlates.

    William M. Perlstein;Michael A. Cole;Jason A. Demery;Paul J. Seignourel

  • Predictors of functional impairment in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Eric A. Storch;Michael J. Larson;Jordana Muroff;Nicole Caporino

  • Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability.

    Peter E. Clayson;Peter E. Clayson;Kaylie A. Carbine;Scott A. Baldwin;Michael J. Larson

  • The impact of a brief mindfulness meditation intervention on cognitive control and error-related performance monitoring.

    Michael J. Larson;Patrick R. Steffen;Mark Primosch

  • Reward sensitivity following boredom and cognitive effort: A high-powered neurophysiological investigation

    Marina Milyavskaya;Michael Inzlicht;Travis Johnson;Michael J. Larson

  • Sample size calculations in human electrophysiology (EEG and ERP) studies: A systematic review and recommendations for increased rigor.

    Michael J. Larson;Kaylie A. Carbine

  • Women, Co-occurring Disorders, and Violence Study: evaluation design and study population.

    G. J. McHugo;Nina Kammerer;Elizabeth W. Jackson;Laurie S. Markoff

  • Peer Victimization in Youth with Autism Spectrum Disorders and Co-occurring Anxiety: Relations with Psychopathology and Loneliness

    Eric A. Storch;Michael J. Larson;Jill Ehrenreich-May;Elysse B. Arnold

  • Temporal dissociation of components of cognitive control dysfunction in severe TBI: ERPs and the cued-Stroop task.

    William M. Perlstein;Michael J. Larson;Vonetta M. Dotson;Kiesa G. Kelly

  • Insight in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder: associations with clinical presentation.

    Eric A. Storch;Vanessa A. Milsom;Lisa J. Merlo;Michael Larson

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter E. Clayson
Peter E. Clayson University of California, Los Angeles
Eric A. Storch
Eric A. Storch Baylor College of Medicine
Scott A. Baldwin
Scott A. Baldwin Brigham Young University
Tanya K. Murphy
Tanya K. Murphy University of South Florida
William M. Perlstein
William M. Perlstein University of Florida
Wayne K. Goodman
Wayne K. Goodman Baylor College of Medicine
Mikle South
Mikle South Brigham Young University
Gary R. Geffken
Gary R. Geffken University of Florida
Lisa J. Merlo
Lisa J. Merlo University of Florida
Adam B. Lewin
Adam B. Lewin University of South Florida

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a range of related careers, including social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many institutions across the USA now offer flexible online degrees tailored for students balancing work, family, or other commitments. Online programs often closely match the curriculum and accreditation standards of their on-campus counterparts.

For those interested in the social work field, state-specific requirements are crucial. Each state sets its own licensing process and educational prerequisites. For example, if you want to learn about becoming a social worker in Mississippi, you’ll need to understand the unique guidelines set by Mississippi’s licensing board. Similarly, how to become a social worker in Missouri changes based on the state’s specific credentials and supervised experience hours required.

If you are planning a career in other states, researching how to become a social worker in Montana or how to become a social worker in Nebraska will help you compare their unique processes. Choosing an online degree that is properly accredited and meets these varying state requirements can ensure a smoother path toward your chosen career.

Best Scientists Citing Michael J. Larson

Trending Scientists