World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 48 5877 5462 3189 2894 108 11068

Scott A. Baldwin publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott A. Baldwin between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott A. Baldwin published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2017. 24 of the 150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2017. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 12 publications
2002 2025

150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott A. Baldwin: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 2
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 1
2008 3
2009 6
2010 9
2011 6
2012 4
2013 7
2014 5
2015 3
2016 6
2017 14
2018 6
2019 2
2020 11
2021 14
2022 4
2023 14
2024 12
2025 12
Total 150
Download as CSV

Scott A. Baldwin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Baldwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 108
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott A. Baldwin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott A. Baldwin sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 48
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott A. Baldwin is affiliated with Brigham Young University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Psychology with a focus on multiple subfields, including Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Clinical Psychology.

The main research topics covered by Baldwin's work include Behavioral Health and Interventions, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Mental Health Research Topics, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Digital Mental Health Interventions, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, and Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control.

Some of the recent papers authored by Baldwin include the following:

  • The data-processing multiverse of event-related potentials (ERPs): A roadmap for the optimization and standardization of ERP processing and reduction pipelines, 2021, NeuroImage
  • Evaluating the internal consistency of subtraction-based and residualized difference scores: Considerations for psychometric reliability analyses of event-related potentials, 2021, Psychophysiology
  • Alliance With an Unguided Smartphone App: Validation of the Digital Working Alliance Inventory, 2021, Assessment
  • Using generalizability theory and the ERP Reliability Analysis (ERA) Toolbox for assessing test-retest reliability of ERP scores part 1: Algorithms, framework, and implementation, 2021, International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • The open access advantage for studies of human electrophysiology: Impact on citations and Altmetrics, 2021, International Journal of Psychophysiology

Baldwin frequently collaborates with colleagues in the field. The most common co-authors include:

  • Michael J. Larson
  • Peter E. Clayson
  • Kristen P. Lindgren
  • Kirsten P. Peterson
  • Simon B. Goldberg

The researcher's work is often published across several venues specializing in psychology and neuroscience, with multiple papers appearing in:

  • Psychophysiology
  • International Journal of Psychophysiology
  • Psychotherapy
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback

Best Publications

  • Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance.

    Scott A. Baldwin;Bruce E. Wampold;Zac E. Imel

  • Does marriage and relationship education work? A meta-analytic study.

    Alan J. Hawkins;Victoria L. Blanchard;Scott A. Baldwin;Elizabeth B. Fawcett

  • Continuing Bonds and Reconstructing Meaning: Mitigating Complications in Bereavement.

    Robert A Neimeyer;Scott A Baldwin;James Gillies

  • Meta-analysis of MFT interventions.

    William R. Shadish;Scott A. Baldwin

  • The Dynamics of Self-Esteem: A Growth-Curve Analysis

    Scott A. Baldwin;John P. Hoffmann

  • A tutorial on count regression and zero-altered count models for longitudinal substance use data

    David C. Atkins;Scott A. Baldwin;Cheng Zheng;Robert J. Gallop

  • Investigating the effects of marriage and relationship education on couples' communication skills: a meta-analytic study.

    Victoria L. Blanchard;Alan J. Hawkins;Scott A. Baldwin;Elizabeth B. Fawcett

  • Rates of change in naturalistic psychotherapy: contrasting dose-effect and good-enough level models of change.

    Scott A. Baldwin;Arjan Berkeljon;David C. Atkins;Joseph A. Olsen

  • Effects of behavioral marital therapy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

    William R. Shadish;Scott A. Baldwin

  • The Effects of Family Therapies for Adolescent Delinquency and Substance Abuse: A Meta-Analysis.

    Scott A. Baldwin;Sarah Christian;Arjan Berkeljon;William R. Shadish

  • Multiple Pathways to Functional Impairment in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Yeraz Markarian;Michael J. Larson;Mirela A. Aldea;Scott A. Baldwin

  • Empirically supported treatments or type I errors? Problems with the analysis of data from group-administered treatments.

    Scott A. Baldwin;David M. Murray;William R. Shadish

  • How does noise affect amplitude and latency measurement of event‐related potentials (ERPs)? A methodological critique and simulation study

    Peter E. Clayson;Scott A. Baldwin;Michael J. Larson

  • Youth Psychotherapy Change Trajectories and Outcomes in Usual Care: Community Mental Health versus Managed Care Settings.

    Jared S. Warren;Philip L. Nelson;Sasha A. Mondragon;Scott A. Baldwin

  • Analyzing multiple outcomes in clinical research using multivariate multilevel models.

    Scott A. Baldwin;Zac E. Imel;Scott R. Braithwaite;David C. Atkins

  • Relative effects of CBT and pharmacotherapy in depression versus anxiety: is medication somewhat better for depression, and CBT somewhat better for anxiety?

    Babak Roshanaei-Moghaddam;Michael C. Pauly;David C. Atkins;Scott A. Baldwin

  • Bayesian methods for the analysis of small sample multilevel data with a complex variance structure.

    Scott A. Baldwin;Gilbert W. Fellingham

  • Beyond the individual: group effects in mindfulness-based stress reduction.

    Zac Imel;Scott Baldwin;Katherine Bonus;Donal MacCoon

  • Methodological reporting behavior, sample sizes, and statistical power in studies of event-related potentials: Barriers to reproducibility and replicability.

    Peter E. Clayson;Peter E. Clayson;Kaylie A. Carbine;Scott A. Baldwin;Michael J. Larson

  • Racial/ethnic disparities in therapist effectiveness: a conceptualization and initial study of cultural competence.

    Zac E. Imel;Scott Baldwin;David C. Atkins;Jesse Owen

  • Evaluating Models for Partially Clustered Designs

    Scott A. Baldwin;Daniel J. Bauer;Eric Stice;Paul Rohde

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Larson
Michael J. Larson Brigham Young University
David C. Atkins
David C. Atkins University of Washington
Zac E. Imel
Zac E. Imel University of Utah
Peter E. Clayson
Peter E. Clayson University of California, Los Angeles
William R. Shadish
William R. Shadish University of California, Merced
Bethany A. Teachman
Bethany A. Teachman University of Virginia
Clayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors University of Houston
Daniel J. Bauer
Daniel J. Bauer University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Reinout W. Wiers
Reinout W. Wiers University of Amsterdam
Simon B. Goldberg
Simon B. Goldberg University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in psychology, there are several related online degrees and career pathways worth exploring. Social work is a popular choice, allowing you to support individuals and communities directly. Requirements for entering this field vary across states. For instance, if you want to practice in New York, it's essential to understand the New York social work education requirements.

Additionally, those considering North Carolina should look into becoming a social worker in North Carolina, which involves unique educational and licensure steps.

In North Dakota, the profession is governed by specific North Dakota social work license requirements that detail academic credentials and supervised experience.

Similarly, those looking to advance their careers in Ohio should review how how to become a social worker in Ohio, as licensing standards and degree prerequisites may differ.

Exploring these online pathways can help you understand state-specific demands and find the best fit for your career goals in psychology and allied fields.

Best Scientists Citing Scott A. Baldwin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles