World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5375 4990 2941 2667 133 12273

Zac E. Imel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Zac E. Imel between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Zac E. Imel published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 7.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2015. 14 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2015. 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications
2006 2025

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Zac E. Imel: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 2
2007 4
2008 7
2009 5
2010 2
2011 3
2012 7
2013 4
2014 6
2015 23
2016 13
2017 10
2018 6
2019 8
2020 7
2021 10
2022 7
2023 7
2024 7
2025 7
Total 145
Download as CSV

Zac E. Imel publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zac E. Imel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 133 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 133
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Zac E. Imel D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zac E. Imel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Zac E. Imel is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States and works primarily in the field of psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology, social psychology, applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and artificial intelligence. Their research encompasses various aspects of digital mental health interventions and psychotherapy techniques.

The scientist's work includes notable publications such as:

  • Machine learning and natural language processing in psychotherapy research: Alliance as example use case, 2020, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • How do you feel? Using natural language processing to automatically rate emotion in psychotherapy, 2021, Behavior Research Methods
  • Automated evaluation of psychotherapy skills using speech and language technologies, 2021, Behavior Research Methods
  • Facilitating dyadic synchrony in psychotherapy sessions: Systematic review and meta-analysis, 2023, Psychotherapy Research
  • Enhancing the quality of cognitive behavioral therapy in community mental health through artificial intelligence generated fidelity feedback (Project AFFECT): a study protocol, 2022, BMC Health Services Research

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • David C. Atkins
  • Michael Tanana
  • Patty Kuo
  • Shrikanth Narayanan
  • Christina S. Soma

The venues where Zac E. Imel frequently publishes include:

  • Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • Psychotherapy
  • Psychiatric Services
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Behavior Research Methods

The scientist's main research topics cover:

  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology

Best Publications

  • The Great Psychotherapy Debate

    Bruce E. Wampold;Zac E. Imel

  • Untangling the alliance-outcome correlation: exploring the relative importance of therapist and patient variability in the alliance.

    Scott A. Baldwin;Bruce E. Wampold;Zac E. Imel

  • Meta-analysis of dropout in treatments for posttraumatic stress disorder.

    Zac E. Imel;Kevin Laska;Matthew Jakupcak;Tracy L. Simpson

  • The relative efficacy of bona fide psychotherapies for treating post-traumatic stress disorder: a meta-analysis of direct comparisons

    Steven G. Benish;Zac E. Imel;Bruce E. Wampold

  • Posttraumatic stress disorder as a risk factor for suicidal ideation in Iraq and Afghanistan War veterans.

    Matthew Jakupcak;Jessica Cook;Zac Imel;A. Fontana

  • The validation of an active control intervention for Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction (MBSR)

    Donal G. MacCoon;Zac E. Imel;Melissa A. Rosenkranz;Jenna G. Sheftel

  • The importance of treatment and the science of common factors in psychotherapy.

    Zac E. Imel;Bruce E. Wampold

  • A meta-analysis of psychotherapy and medication in unipolar depression and dysthymia.

    Zac E. Imel;Melanie B. Malterer;Kevin M. McKay;Bruce E. Wampold

  • Addressing racial and ethnic microaggressions in therapy.

    Jesse Owen;Karen W. Tao;Zac E. Imel;Bruce E. Wampold

  • Distinctions without a difference: direct comparisons of psychotherapies for alcohol use disorders.

    Zac E. Imel;Bruce E. Wampold;Scott D. Miller;Reg R. Fleming

  • Determining what works in the treatment of PTSD

    Bruce E. Wampold;Zac E. Imel;Kevin M. Laska;Steven Benish

  • Combat Exposure and Risk for Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviors Among Military Personnel and Veterans: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Craig J. Bryan;James E. Griffith;Brian T. Pace;Kent Hinkson

  • Multiple regression and correlation techniques: Recent controversies and best practices.

    William T. Hoyt;Zac E. Imel;Fong Chan

  • A meta-analysis of multicultural competencies and psychotherapy process and outcome.

    Karen W. Tao;Jesse Owen;Brian T. Pace;Zac E. Imel

  • Psychiatrist effects in the psychopharmacological treatment of depression

    Kevin M. McKay;Zac E. Imel;Bruce E. Wampold

  • Analyzing multiple outcomes in clinical research using multivariate multilevel models.

    Scott A. Baldwin;Zac E. Imel;Scott R. Braithwaite;David C. Atkins

  • The Association of Therapist Empathy and Synchrony in Vocally Encoded Arousal

    Zac E. Imel;Jacqueline S. Barco;Halley J. Brown;Brian R. Baucom

  • Cultural ruptures in short‐term therapy: Working alliance as a mediator between clients' perceptions of microaggressions and therapy outcomes

    Jesse Owen;Zac Imel;Karen W. Tao;Bruce Wampold

  • Proceedings from the 9th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation

    David Chambers;Lisa Simpson;Felicia Hill-Briggs;Gila Neta

  • More Than Reflections: Empathy in Motivational Interviewing Includes Language Style Synchrony Between Therapist and Client

    Sarah Peregrine Lord;Elisa Sheng;Zac E. Imel;John Baer

  • Beyond the individual: group effects in mindfulness-based stress reduction.

    Zac Imel;Scott Baldwin;Katherine Bonus;Donal MacCoon

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Atkins
David C. Atkins University of Washington
Bruce E. Wampold
Bruce E. Wampold University of Wisconsin–Madison
Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Shrikanth S. Narayanan University of Southern California
Panayiotis G. Georgiou
Panayiotis G. Georgiou University of Southern California
Scott A. Baldwin
Scott A. Baldwin Brigham Young University
Jesse Owen
Jesse Owen University of Denver
Vivek Srikumar
Vivek Srikumar University of Utah
Mark Steyvers
Mark Steyvers University of California, Irvine
Padhraic Smyth
Padhraic Smyth University of California, Irvine
Simon B. Goldberg
Simon B. Goldberg University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology can open doors to a wide range of career pathways, from counseling to clinical work. Many students consider online degrees as a flexible option, allowing them to balance studies with work or family commitments. These programs often prepare students for licensure requirements, but it’s vital to research your intended state’s criteria.

Becoming a licensed therapist involves meeting educational, supervised experience, and examination standards—which differ by location. For example, you can explore the licensed therapist requirements in Arlington or see what’s involved if you’re interested in how to become a licensed therapist in Atlanta. Similar guidance is available for those considering becoming a licensed therapist in Aurora or meeting the licensed therapist requirements in Austin.

By selecting an accredited online psychology program and understanding state-specific pathways, students can confidently progress toward a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Zac E. Imel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles