World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 92 860 753 546 467 301 64245

David C. Atkins publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David C. Atkins between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David C. Atkins published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 11.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2015. 7 of the 399 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2015. 1991: 2 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 20 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 39 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1991 2025

399 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David C. Atkins: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 2
1992 2
1993 5
1994 4
1995 2
1996 5
1997 2
1998 1
1999 2
2000 0
2001 3
2002 4
2003 6
2004 7
2005 12
2006 11
2007 4
2008 6
2009 10
2010 19
2011 20
2012 20
2013 13
2014 22
2015 39
2016 29
2017 23
2018 23
2019 27
2020 15
2021 28
2022 11
2023 15
2024 4
2025 3
Total 399
Download as CSV

David C. Atkins publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Atkins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 301–310 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 301 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102 301
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David C. Atkins D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Atkins sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70 92
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David C. Atkins is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. Their research primarily spans the intersection of psychology and medicine, with a focus on fields such as general health professions, applied psychology, social psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, and artificial intelligence.

The main topics covered in their work include digital mental health interventions, mental health research topics, mental health via writing, health policy implementation science, topic modeling, opioid use disorder treatment, and psychotherapy techniques and applications.

Atkins has published extensively, with notable papers including:

  • Human-AI collaboration enables more empathic conversations in text-based peer-to-peer mental health support, 2023, Nature Machine Intelligence
  • Machine learning and natural language processing in psychotherapy research: Alliance as example use case, 2020, Journal of Counseling Psychology
  • How do you feel? Using natural language processing to automatically rate emotion in psychotherapy, 2021, Behavior Research Methods
  • Automated evaluation of psychotherapy skills using speech and language technologies, 2021, Behavior Research Methods
  • Enhancing the quality of cognitive behavioral therapy in community mental health through artificial intelligence generated fidelity feedback (Project AFFECT): a study protocol, 2022, BMC Health Services Research

Frequent co-authors of Atkins include Zac E. Imel, Shrikanth Narayanan, Michael Tanana, Nikolaos Flemotomos, and Torrey A. Creed.

Atkins' frequent publication venues comprise:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • Addiction Science & Clinical Practice
  • JMIR Research Protocols

Best Publications

  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement

    D Moher;A Liberati;J Tetzlaff;D G Altman

  • Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

    David Atkins;Dana Best;Peter A Briss;Martin Eccles

  • GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Gunn Vist;Regina Kunz

  • Randomized trial of behavioral activation, cognitive therapy, and antidepressant medication in the acute treatment of adults with major depression.

    Sona Dimidjian;Steven D. Hollon;Keith S. Dobson;Karen B. Schmaling

  • GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Regina Kunz;David Atkins

  • GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Victor Manuel Montori;Gunn Vist

  • GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence

    Gordon H. Guyatt;Andrew D. Oxman;Shahnaz Sultan;Paul P. Glasziou

  • Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement (Chinese edition)

    D Moher;A Liberati;A Liberati;J Tetzlaff;D G Altman

  • Health Care and Public Service Use and Costs Before and After Provision of Housing for Chronically Homeless Persons With Severe Alcohol Problems

    Mary E. Larimer;Daniel K. Malone;Michelle D. Garner;David C. Atkins

  • Understanding infidelity: Correlates in a national random sample.

    David C. Atkins;Donald H. Baucom;Neil S. Jacobson

  • AHRQ Series Paper 5: Grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions—Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the Effective Health-Care Program

    Douglas K. Owens;Douglas K. Owens;Kathleen N. Lohr;David Atkins;Jonathan R. Treadwell

  • Rethinking how family researchers model infrequent outcomes: a tutorial on count regression and zero-inflated models.

    David C. Atkins;Robert J. Gallop

  • Traditional versus integrative behavioral couple therapy for significantly and chronically distressed married couples.

    Andrew Christensen;David C. Atkins;Sara Berns;Jennifer Wheeler

  • Good Research Practices for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Defining, Reporting and Interpreting Nonrandomized Studies of Treatment Effects Using Secondary Data Sources: The ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report—Part I

    Marc L. Berger;Muhammad Mamdani;David Atkins;Michael L. Johnson

  • Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Contextual Factors in Engaging in and Responding to Extramarital Involvement

    Elizabeth S. Allen;David C. Atkins;Donald H. Baucom;Douglas K. Snyder

  • A tutorial on count regression and zero-altered count models for longitudinal substance use data

    David C. Atkins;Scott A. Baldwin;Cheng Zheng;Robert J. Gallop

  • Rates of change in naturalistic psychotherapy: contrasting dose-effect and good-enough level models of change.

    Scott A. Baldwin;Arjan Berkeljon;David C. Atkins;Joseph A. Olsen

  • The Risk of Myocardial Infarction Associated With the Combined Use of Estrogens and Progestins in Postmenopausal Women

    Bruce M. Psaty;Susan R. Heckbert;David Atkins;Rozenn Lemaitre

  • The Use and Effectiveness of Mobile Apps for Depression: Results From a Fully Remote Clinical Trial.

    Patricia A Arean;Kevin A Hallgren;Joshua T Jordan;Adam Gazzaley

  • Using multilevel models to analyze couple and family treatment data: basic and advanced issues.

    David C. Atkins

Frequent Co-Authors

Zac E. Imel
Zac E. Imel University of Utah
Shrikanth S. Narayanan
Shrikanth S. Narayanan University of Southern California
Panayiotis G. Georgiou
Panayiotis G. Georgiou University of Southern California
Andrew Christensen
Andrew Christensen University of California, Los Angeles
Christine M. Lee
Christine M. Lee University of Washington
Mary E. Larimer
Mary E. Larimer University of Washington
Donald H. Baucom
Donald H. Baucom University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Clayton Neighbors
Clayton Neighbors University of Houston
Scott A. Baldwin
Scott A. Baldwin Brigham Young University
Melissa A. Lewis
Melissa A. Lewis University of North Texas Health Science Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology is a versatile foundation for multiple career options, especially in the social services sector. Many students interested in psychology go on to enter fields such as counseling, mental health, and social work, where a strong understanding of human behavior is invaluable.

If you are considering a career in social work, it’s important to know that each state has unique steps and requirements for licensure. For example, aspiring professionals can explore the requirements to be a social worker in Rhode Island. Similarly, those interested in practicing in the southeast can review the South Carolina social work license requirements to learn more about educational and training expectations.

Students wishing to go farther north can look into becoming a social worker in South Dakota for a detailed breakdown of state-specific pathways. Meanwhile, those targeting the southern region can read about how to become a social worker in Tennessee to understand the local qualifications.

Online psychology and social work programs allow flexible study while opening doors to a variety of fulfilling careers. Be sure to research your state’s requirements to ensure you select the best pathway for your goals.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Atkins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles