World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
64
Citations
47959
World Ranking
2729
National Ranking
1197

Noah A. Rosenberg publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noah A. Rosenberg sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 225 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

Noah A. Rosenberg D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Noah A. Rosenberg sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2006 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Noah A. Rosenberg is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States and specializes primarily in the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their work encompasses a significant number of publications, with a particular focus on genetics, molecular biology, ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics, as well as artificial intelligence.

Their research interest covers diverse subfields including:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Ecology

Key topics explored in their work include:

  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Forensic and Genetic Research
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock

Their recent scholarly contributions include:

  • "Ancient and modern genomics of the Ohlone Indigenous population of California" (2022), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "On the heterozygosity of an admixed population" (2020), published in Journal of Mathematical Biology
  • "Distance metrics for ranked evolutionary trees" (2020), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Modelling anti-vaccine sentiment as a cultural pathogen" (2020), published in Evolutionary Human Sciences
  • "Genetic Adaptation in New York City Rats" (2020), published in Genome Biology and Evolution

They frequently collaborate with several coauthors, including:

  • Egor Lappo
  • Alissa L. Severson
  • Jaehee Kim
  • Maike L. Morrison
  • Xiran Liu

Their work is often published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Theoretical Population Biology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences

In addition to articles, Noah A. Rosenberg has authored a book titled Mathematical Properties of Population-Genetic Statistics, to be published by Princeton University Press in 2025.

Their contributions have been recognized by awards such as:

  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2018
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation, 2006

Best Publications

  • CLUMPP: a cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure

    Mattias Jakobsson;Noah A. Rosenberg

  • distruct: a program for the graphical display of population structure

    Noah A. Rosenberg

  • Genetic Structure of Human Populations

    Noah A. Rosenberg;Jonathan K. Pritchard;James L. Weber;Howard M. Cann

  • Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K

    Naama M. Kopelman;Jonathan Mayzel;Mattias Jakobsson;Noah A. Rosenberg

  • Association Mapping in Structured Populations

    Jonathan K. Pritchard;Matthew Stephens;Noah A. Rosenberg;Peter Donnelly

  • Gene tree discordance, phylogenetic inference and the multispecies coalescent

    James H. Degnan;James H. Degnan;Noah A. Rosenberg

  • Use of unlinked genetic markers to detect population stratification in association studies.

    Jonathan K. Pritchard;Jonathan K. Pritchard;Noah A. Rosenberg

  • Support from the relationship of genetic and geographic distance in human populations for a serial founder effect originating in Africa

    Sohini Ramachandran;Omkar Deshpande;Charles C. Roseman;Noah A. Rosenberg

  • The pattern of polymorphism in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    Magnus Nordborg;Tina T Hu;Yoko Ishino;Jinal Jhaveri

  • Inferring Species Trees Directly from Biallelic Genetic Markers: Bypassing Gene Trees in a Full Coalescent Analysis

    David Bryant;Remco Bouckaert;Joseph Felsenstein;Noah A. Rosenberg

  • Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees.

    James H Degnan;Noah A Rosenberg

  • Genotype, haplotype and copy-number variation in worldwide human populations

    Mattias Jakobsson;Sonja W. Scholz;Sonja W. Scholz;Paul A Scheet;J. Raphael Gibbs;J. Raphael Gibbs

  • Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms

    Noah A. Rosenberg;Magnus Nordborg

  • Informativeness of Genetic Markers for Inference of Ancestry

    Noah A. Rosenberg;Lei M. Li;Ryk Ward;Jonathan K. Pritchard

  • Genetic Variation and Population Structure in Native Americans

    Sijia Wang;Cecil M. Lewis;Mattias Jakobsson;Sohini Ramachandran

  • ADZE: a rarefaction approach for counting alleles private to combinations of populations

    Zachary A. Szpiech;Mattias Jakobsson;Noah A. Rosenberg

  • Clines, clusters, and the effect of study design on the inference of human population structure.

    Noah A Rosenberg;Saurabh Mahajan;Sohini Ramachandran;Chengfeng Zhao

  • Genome-wide association studies in diverse populations

    Noah A. Rosenberg;Lucy Huang;Ethan M. Jewett;Zachary A. Szpiech

  • A worldwide survey of haplotype variation and linkage disequilibrium in the human genome

    Donald F Conrad;Mattias Jakobsson;Graham Coop;Xiaoquan Wen

  • Genomic Patterns of Homozygosity in Worldwide Human Populations

    Trevor J. Pemberton;Devin Absher;Marcus W. Feldman;Richard M. Myers

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcus W. Feldman
Marcus W. Feldman Stanford University
Mattias Jakobsson
Mattias Jakobsson Uppsala University
Jonathan K. Pritchard
Jonathan K. Pritchard Stanford University
Jun Li
Jun Li University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Sebastian Zöllner
Sebastian Zöllner University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Paul Scheet
Paul Scheet The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Andrew B. Singleton
Andrew B. Singleton National Institutes of Health
Jeffrey D. Wall
Jeffrey D. Wall University of California, San Francisco
Vineet Bafna
Vineet Bafna University of California, San Diego
Tanja Stadler
Tanja Stadler Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of Genetics opens up diverse opportunities, particularly as online education continues to expand. For those seeking flexible study options, several accredited self paced online colleges offer genetics and associated science programs, allowing students to learn at their own rhythm.

If you're eager to enter the workforce quickly, consider accelerated degrees in health sciences or related areas. These programs can shorten your path to graduation without sacrificing educational quality.

Interested in supporting roles within healthcare? The best accredited medical billing and coding schools online provide a direct route into in-demand administrative and data-focused careers that complement clinical genetics work.

Many prospective students worry about the cost and complexity of applying to college. Fortunately, there are online college free application options that remove financial barriers, making it easier for aspiring genetics professionals to start their educational journey.

Best Scientists Citing Noah A. Rosenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles