World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
15540
World Ranking
4520
National Ranking
2512

Rick E. Ingram publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick E. Ingram sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 128 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rick E. Ingram D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick E. Ingram sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rick E. Ingram is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and health professions, with particular emphasis on experimental and cognitive psychology, clinical psychology, and public health-related disciplines.

The scientist has contributed to studies covering a broad range of topics. These include anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, sleep and related disorders, sleep and wakefulness research, sleep and work-related fatigue, electronic health records systems, telemedicine and telehealth implementation, and mobile health and mHealth applications.

Recent publications by Rick E. Ingram include:

  • "Dysfunctional sleep insufficiency and reduced P3 attentional response to positive social information" (2021, Sleep and Biological Rhythms)
  • "Patient Engagement in Patient Portals in Appalachia v. Surrounding U.S. Census Regions" (2024, PubMed)
  • "The association of negative mood with automatic and effortful facial expression mimicry" (2023, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Co-rumination and depression: A systematic review and future directions" (2025, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology)
  • "Association Between Insurer Connectivity in Appalachian Population Health Networks and Preventable Hospitalizations" (2024, PubMed)

Their frequent coauthors include:

  • Steven L. Bistricky
  • Christine A. P. Walther
  • Jessica Balderas
  • Jasmin Prudon
  • Christopher P. Ward

Rick E. Ingram's research has been published in these venues on multiple occasions:

  • PubMed (2 publications)
  • Sleep and Biological Rhythms
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
  • Psychological Reports

Best Publications

  • Self-focused attention in clinical disorders: review and a conceptual model.

    Rick E. Ingram

  • Issues and recommendations regarding use of the Beck Depression Inventory

    Philip C. Kendall;Steven D. Hollon;Aaron T. Beck;Constance L. Hammen

  • Cognitive Vulnerability to Depression

    Rick E. Ingram;Jeanne Miranda;Zindel V. Segal

  • Vulnerability-Stress Models

    Rick E. Ingram;David D. Luxton

  • Cognitive reactivity and vulnerability: empirical evaluation of construct activation and cognitive diatheses in unipolar depression.

    Christine D. Scher;Rick E. Ingram;Zindel V. Segal

  • Toward an information-processing analysis of depression.

    Rick E. Ingram

  • Assessment of positive automatic cognition.

    Rick E. Ingram;Kathleen S. Wisnicki

  • Mood priming and construct activation in tests of cognitive vulnerability to unipolar depression

    Zindel V. Segal;Rick E. Ingram

  • Depression and internal versus external focus of attention

    Rick E. Ingram;Timothy W. Smith

  • Cognitive Processes in Cognitive Therapy: Evaluation of the Mechanisms of Change in the Treatment of Depression

    Genevieve Garratt;Rick E. Ingram;Kevin L. Rand;Gita Sawalani

  • Vulnerability to Psychopathology: Risk across the Lifespan

    Rick E. Ingram;Joseph M. Price

  • Cognitive specificity in emotional distress.

    Rick E. Ingram;Philip C. Kendall;Timothy W. Smith;Christina Donnell

  • The cognitive side of anxiety

    Rick E. Ingram;Philip C. Kendall

  • Pupillary and reaction time measures of sustained processing of negative information in depression.

    Greg J Siegle;Eric Granholm;Eric Granholm;Rick E Ingram;Georg E Matt

  • Vulnerability to depression: cognitive reactivity and parental bonding in high-risk individuals.

    Rick E. Ingram;Jennifer Ritter

  • On the self-serving function of social anxiety: shyness as a self-handicapping strategy.

    C. R. Snyder;Timothy W. Smith;Robert W. Augelli;Rick E. Ingram

  • Self-focused attention, gender, gender role, and vulnerability to negative affect.

    Rick E. Ingram;Debra Cruet;Brenda R. Johnson;Kathleen S. Wisnicki

  • Self-awareness and self-confrontation: Effects of self-focused attention on members of a clinical population.

    Frederick X. Gibbons;Timothy W. Smith;Rick E. Ingram;Kathy Pearce

  • A meta-analytic review of mood-congruent implicit memory in depressed mood

    Unknown

  • Information processing approaches to clinical psychology

    Rick E. Ingram

  • The future for cognitive assessment of anxiety: Let's get specific.

    Philip C. Kendall;Rick Ingram

Frequent Co-Authors

Greg J. Siegle
Greg J. Siegle University of Pittsburgh
Philip C. Kendall
Philip C. Kendall Temple University
Timothy W. Smith
Timothy W. Smith University of Utah
Vanessa L. Malcarne
Vanessa L. Malcarne San Diego State University
Zindel V. Segal
Zindel V. Segal University of Toronto
C. R. Snyder
C. R. Snyder University of Kansas
W. Kyle Simmons
W. Kyle Simmons Oklahoma State University Center for Health Sciences
Steven D. Hollon
Steven D. Hollon Vanderbilt University
Denise A. Chavira
Denise A. Chavira University of California, Los Angeles
Cary R. Savage
Cary R. Savage University of Nebraska–Lincoln

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens doors to diverse online programs and exciting career paths. Many professionals leverage their psychology background to explore specialized roles, such as speech-language pathology and marriage and family therapy. Each path comes with distinct educational and licensing requirements depending on your state or city.

For instance, those interested in becoming a speech therapist in Wyoming will need a relevant master’s degree, clinical hours, and to pass a national exam. Alternatively, aspiring therapists can explore family counseling. If your goal is to learn how to become an mft in Albuquerque, you should know the region’s specific requirements, which typically include a graduate degree, supervised practice, and state licensing.

Requirements can differ significantly: learn more about Anaheim mft education requirements or discover the unique licensing process for how to become a marriage and family therapist in Anchorage. Online psychology programs often offer the flexibility to earn the needed credentials in your field, making it easier to take the next step toward your professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Rick E. Ingram

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles