What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Erosion
- Statistics
- Electron
His primary areas of study are Mineralogy, Feldspar, Optical dating, Equivalent dose and Optically stimulated luminescence.
His Mineralogy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Luminescence, Computational physics and Quartz.
Jakob Wallinga interconnects Effective mass, Phonon, Condensed matter physics and Energy level in the investigation of issues within Feldspar.
His studies in Optical dating integrate themes in fields like Deposition and Geochronology.
His Equivalent dose research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Alkali feldspar and Electron trapping.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Time delay and integration and Fluvial in addition to Optically stimulated luminescence.
His most cited work include:
- The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations sustainable development goals (626 citations)
- Mississippi Delta subsidence primarily caused by compaction of Holocene strata (320 citations)
- Mississippi Delta subsidence primarily caused by compaction of Holocene strata (320 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His main research concerns Fluvial, Optically stimulated luminescence, Mineralogy, Holocene and Feldspar.
His work deals with themes such as Glacial period, Deposition and Geochemistry, which intersect with Fluvial.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Infrared stimulated luminescence, Quartz, Optical dating and Equivalent dose.
His Holocene research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Radiocarbon dating, Sediment, Peat, Physical geography and Meander.
Jakob Wallinga usually deals with Peat and limits it to topics linked to Wetland and Subsidence, Coastal erosion and Coastal plain.
His study in the fields of Alkali feldspar under the domain of Feldspar overlaps with other disciplines such as Mineral and Sensitivity.
He most often published in these fields:
- Fluvial (28.08%)
- Optically stimulated luminescence (27.09%)
- Mineralogy (30.05%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2021)?
- Holocene (20.69%)
- Physical geography (13.30%)
- Geomorphology (15.76%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Jakob Wallinga focuses on Holocene, Physical geography, Geomorphology, Geochemistry and Fluvial.
His Geochemistry research incorporates themes from Alluvium, Silt, Feldspar and Thermoluminescence dating.
The Feldspar study combines topics in areas such as Deposition and Bioturbation.
His Thermoluminescence dating research includes elements of Sediment and Quartz.
His studies deal with areas such as Luminescence, Volcanism and Mineralogy as well as Quartz.
Jakob Wallinga works mostly in the field of Fluvial, limiting it down to topics relating to Meander and, in certain cases, Channelized.
Between 2015 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- The significance of soils and soil science towards realization of the United Nations sustainable development goals (626 citations)
- Do landslides follow landslides? Insights in path dependency from a multi-temporal landslide inventory (52 citations)
- Anatomy of Mississippi Delta growth and its implications for coastal restoration. (48 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Erosion
- Statistics
- Electron
His primary areas of investigation include Holocene, Physical geography, Luminescence, Geomorphology and Soil science.
His Holocene research incorporates elements of Climate change, Pleistocene and Mesolithic.
His Luminescence study incorporates themes from Sample, Quartz and Mineralogy, Thermoluminescence dating.
His research in Quartz is mostly concerned with Feldspar.
He has researched Mineralogy in several fields, including Resolution and Photoluminescence.
His work in the fields of Geomorphology, such as Landslide mitigation, Landslide classification, Fluvial and Landslide, overlaps with other areas such as Path dependency.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
