World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kristina Jørkov Thomsen

Kristina Jørkov Thomsen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 41 7640 7340 106 105 90 7625

Kristina Jørkov Thomsen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kristina Jørkov Thomsen between 2000 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kristina Jørkov Thomsen published across 27 years, from 2000 to 2026, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2015. 2 of the 115 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2015. 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 1 publication 2026: 1 publication
2000 2026

115 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kristina Jørkov Thomsen: publications per year, 2000 to 2026
Year Publications
2000 1
2001 0
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 1
2006 3
2007 2
2008 5
2009 4
2010 6
2011 4
2012 11
2013 6
2014 5
2015 14
2016 4
2017 8
2018 6
2019 2
2020 3
2021 6
2022 5
2023 5
2024 5
2025 1
2026 1
Total 115
Download as CSV

Kristina Jørkov Thomsen publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristina Jørkov Thomsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 90 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361 90
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Kristina Jørkov Thomsen D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kristina Jørkov Thomsen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343 41
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Kristina Jørkov Thomsen is a researcher affiliated with the Technical University of Denmark in Denmark. Their work primarily spans the field of Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong focus on several subfields including Atmospheric Science, Anthropology, Paleontology, Environmental Chemistry, and Archeology.

The scientist's research covers a variety of main topics related to geology and ancient environments. These include:

  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Archaeology and Ancient Environmental Studies
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Archaeological and Geological Studies
  • Marine and Environmental Studies

Kristina Jørkov Thomsen has contributed to a range of publication venues, with recurrent publications found in:

  • Quaternary Geochronology
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Geochronology
  • Radiation Measurements
  • Nature Reviews Methods Primers

Their recent academic papers reflect a variety of methodological and applied research areas. Notable recent publications include:

  • "Optically stimulated luminescence dating using quartz," 2021, Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • "Guide for interpreting and reporting luminescence dating results," 2022, Geological Society of America Bulletin
  • "The earliest unambiguous Neanderthal engravings on cave walls: La Roche-Cotard, Loire Valley, France," 2023, PLoS ONE
  • "Timing of the Middle-to-Upper Palaeolithic transition in the Iberian inland (Cardina-Salto do Boi, Côa Valley, Portugal)," 2020, Quaternary Research
  • "Advanced Classification of Microstructures in EBSD Datasets Using AZtecCrystal," 2020, Microscopy and Microanalysis

Collaboration plays a significant role in Thomsen's research activities. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Andrew Murray
  • Guillaume Guérin
  • Mayank Jain
  • Jan-Pieter Buylaert
  • Trine Holm Freiesleben

Best Publications

  • Laboratory fading rates of various luminescence signals from feldspar-rich sediment extracts

    Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;A.S. Murray;Mayank Jain;Lars Bøtter-Jensen

  • A robust feldspar luminescence dating method for Middle and Late Pleistocene sediments

    Jan-Pieter Buylaert;Jan-Pieter Buylaert;Mayank Jain;Andrew S. Murray;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen

  • Testing the potential of an elevated temperature IRSL signal from K-feldspar

    Jan-Pieter Buylaert;A.S. Murray;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Mayank Jain

  • Review of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) instrumental developments for retrospective dosimetry

    Lars Bøtter-Jensen;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Mayank Jain

  • Identifying well-bleached quartz using the different bleaching rates of quartz and feldspar luminescence signals

    A.S. Murray;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;N. Masuda;Jan-Pieter Buylaert;Jan-Pieter Buylaert

  • Optically stimulated luminescence dating using quartz

    Andrew Murray;Lee J. Arnold;Jan-Pieter Buylaert;Guillaume Guérin;Guillaume Guérin

  • Sources of variability in OSL dose measurements using single grains of quartz

    Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;A.S. Murray;L. Bøtter-Jensen

  • A new irradiated quartz for beta source calibration

    Vicki Hansen;Andrew Sean Murray;Jan-Pieter Buylaert;Eun-Young Yeo

  • Single-grain dating of young sediments using the pIRIR signal from feldspar

    Tony Reimann;Tony Reimann;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Mayank Jain;Andrew S. Murray

  • Determination of burial dose in incompletely bleached fluvial samples using single grains of quartz

    Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;A.S. Murray;Lars Bøtter-Jensen;J. Kinahan

  • Stability of IRSL signals from sedimentary K-feldspar samples

    Kristina J. Thomsen;Andrew S. Murray;Mayank Jain

  • The effect of preheating on the IRSL signal from feldspar

    A.S. Murray;J.P. Buylaert;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Mayank Jain

  • Counter-intuitive influence of Himalayan river morphodynamics on Indus Civilisation urban settlements

    Ajit Singh;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Rajiv Sinha;Jan-Pieter Buylaert;Jan-Pieter Buylaert

  • Investigating the resetting of OSL signals in rock surfaces

    Reza Sohbati;Andrew S. Murray;Mayank Jain;Jan-Pieter Buylaert;Jan-Pieter Buylaert

  • Absorbed dose, equivalent dose, measured dose rates, and implications for OSL age estimates: Introducing the Average Dose Model

    Guillaume Guérin;Claire Christophe;Anne Philippe;Andrew S. Murray

  • Testing single-grain quartz OSL methods using sediment samples with independent age control from the Bordes-Fitte rockshelter (Roches d'Abilly site, Central France)

    K.J. Thomsen;A.S. Murray;J.P. Buylaert;J.P. Buylaert;M. Jain

  • Modelling dose rate to single grains of quartz in well-sorted sand samples: The dispersion arising from the presence of potassium feldspars and implications for single grain OSL dating

    Guillaume Guerin;Guillaume Guerin;Mayank Jain;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Andrew Sean Murray

  • A new luminescence detection and stimulation head for the Risø TL/OSL reader

    Torben Lapp;Myung Ho Kook;Andrew Sean Murray;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen

  • A multi-method luminescence dating of the Palaeolithic sequence of La Ferrassie based on new excavations adjacent to the La Ferrassie 1 and 2 skeletons

    Guillaume Guerin;Guillaume Guerin;Marine Frouin;Sahra Talamo;Vera Aldeias

  • Reliability of equivalent-dose determination and age-models in the OSL dating of historical and modern palaeoflood sediments

    Alicia Medialdea;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Andrew Sean Murray;G. Benito

  • How confident are we in the chronology of the transition between Howieson's Poort and Still Bay?

    Guillaume Guerin;Andrew S. Murray;Mayank Jain;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen

  • Minimizing feldspar OSL contamination in quartz UV-OSL using pulsed blue stimulation

    Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Mayank Jain;A.S. Murray;Phil M. Denby

  • Household and workplace chemicals as retrospective luminescence dosemeters.

    Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;L. Bøtter-Jensen;A.S. Murray

  • Multi-method (TL and OSL), multi-material (quartz and flint) dating of the Mousterian site of Roc de Marsal (Dordogne, France): correlating Neanderthal occupations with the climatic variability of MIS 5–3

    Guillaume Guerin;Guillaume Guerin;Emmanuel Discamps;Christelle Lahaye;Norbert Mercier

  • Quantification of termite bioturbation in a savannah ecosystem: Application of OSL dating

    Jeppe Ågård Kristensen;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Andrew Murray;Jan-Pieter Buylaert;Jan-Pieter Buylaert

  • Geochemistry of buried river sediments from Ghaggar Plains, NW India: Multi-proxy records of variations in provenance, paleoclimate, and paleovegetation patterns in the Late Quaternary

    Ajit Singh;Debajyoti Paul;Rajiv Sinha;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen

  • Dating a near eastern desert hunting trap (kite) using rock surface luminescence dating

    Sahar al Khasawneh;Andrew Sean Murray;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Wael AbuAzizeh

  • OSL dating of mixed coastal sediment (Sylt, German Bight, North Sea)

    Tony Reimann;Sebastian Lindhorst;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen;Andrew S. Murray

  • The complementarity of luminescence dating methods illustrated on the Mousterian sequence of the Roc de Marsal: A series of reindeer-dominated, Quina Mousterian layers dated to MIS 3

    Guillaume Guerin;Marine Frouin;Joséphine Tuquoi;Kristina Jørkov Thomsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew S. Murray
Andrew S. Murray Technical University of Denmark
Jan-Pieter Buylaert
Jan-Pieter Buylaert Technical University of Denmark
Mayank Jain
Mayank Jain Technical University of Denmark
Sanjeev Gupta
Sanjeev Gupta Imperial College London
Norbert Mercier
Norbert Mercier University of Bordeaux
Rajiv Sinha
Rajiv Sinha Indian Institute of Technology Kanpur
Andrew Carter
Andrew Carter Birkbeck, University of London
Alexander L. Densmore
Alexander L. Densmore Durham University
Paul Goldberg
Paul Goldberg Boston University
Darren F. Mark
Darren F. Mark University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths that intersect with technology, policy, and social sciences. For those interested in leveraging spatial data to address environmental challenges, exploring the top GIS masters programs can provide advanced skills in Geographic Information Systems. This expertise is crucial for roles in environmental mapping, conservation, and urban planning.

Policy-oriented professionals may find value in accelerating their qualifications through a 1 year MPA online program, balancing environmental management with public administration. These programs enable swift career advancement, equipping graduates to influence sustainable policy development effectively.

Understanding human behavior and societal impacts is essential in environmental fields. Pursuing online sociology bachelor programs offers foundational knowledge about social dynamics, enhancing the ability to create community-centered solutions for environmental issues.

For professionals seeking advanced expertise without the traditional dissertation, various online doctoral programs without dissertation requirements provide flexible pathways. These programs support continued learning and leadership in environmental education, policy, and research sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Kristina Jørkov Thomsen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles