World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel Veres

Daniel Veres

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 43 5000 4616 1 1 211 6622

Daniel Veres publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel Veres between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel Veres published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2013. 13 of the 249 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2013. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 5 publications
2002 2025

249 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel Veres: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 3
2004 0
2005 1
2006 2
2007 5
2008 11
2009 6
2010 11
2011 3
2012 9
2013 26
2014 13
2015 9
2016 25
2017 14
2018 24
2019 20
2020 15
2021 22
2022 9
2023 7
2024 8
2025 5
Total 249
Download as CSV

Daniel Veres publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Veres sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 208–217 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 211 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292 211
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel Veres D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel Veres sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279 43
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel Veres is affiliated with the Romanian Academy in Romania and has a research focus largely situated within Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including Atmospheric Science, Oceanography, Anthropology, Paleontology, and Geophysics.

The areas of study explored by Veres encompass a range of topics related to geology, paleoclimatology, and environmental sciences. Their main topics of work include:

  • Geology and Paleoclimatology Research
  • Marine and environmental studies
  • Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology
  • Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis
  • Landslides and related hazards
  • Geological Formations and Processes Exploration

Veres has contributed to a number of scientific papers published in frequently featured venues such as:

  • Quaternary Science Reviews
  • Earth-Science Reviews
  • Quaternary International
  • Scientific Reports
  • Journal of Quaternary Science

Some of the recent papers associated with Veres include:

  • "Loess landscapes of Europe - Mapping, geomorphology, and zonal differentiation" (2020) published in Earth-Science Reviews
  • "Lipid biomarker (brGDGT)- and pollen-based reconstruction of temperature change during the Middle to Late Holocene transition in the Carpathians" (2022) in Global and Planetary Change
  • "Testing polymineral post-IR IRSL and quartz SAR-OSL protocols on Middle to Late Pleistocene loess at Batajnica, Serbia" (2020) in Boreas
  • "Ecosystem shift of a mountain lake under climate and human pressure: A move out from the safe operating space" (2020) in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Crossing new frontiers: extending tephrochronology as a global geoscientific research tool" (2020) in Journal of Quaternary Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Veres include:

  • Ulrich Hambach
  • Slobodan B. Marković
  • Frank Lehmkuhl
  • Enikő K. Magyari
  • Christian Zeeden

Best Publications

  • High‐resolution X‐ray fluorescence core scanning analysis of Les Echets (France) sedimentary sequence: new insights from chemical proxies

    Malin E. Kylander;Linda Ampel;Barbara Wohlfarth;Daniel Veres

  • The Antarctic ice core chronology (AICC2012): an optimized multi-parameter and multi-site dating approach for the last 120 thousand years

    D. Veres;D. Veres;L. Bazin;A. Landais;H. Toyé Mahamadou Kele

  • An optimized multi-proxy, multi-site Antarctic ice and gas orbital chronology (AICC2012): 120--800 ka

    L. Bazin;A. Landais;B. Lemieux-Dudon;H. Toyé Mahamadou Kele

  • Danube loess stratigraphy — Towards a pan-European loess stratigraphic model

    Slobodan B. Marković;Thomas Stevens;George J. Kukla;Ulrich Hambach

  • Loess landscapes of Europe-Mapping, geomorphology, and zonal differentiation

    Frank Lehmkuhl;Janina J. Nett;Stephan Pötter;Philipp Schulte

  • Sequence of events from the onset to the demise of the Last Interglacial: Evaluating strengths and limitations of chronologies used in climatic archives

    Aline Govin;E Capron;P C Tzedakis;S Verheyden

  • Impact of climate change on the transition of Neanderthals to modern humans in Europe

    Michael Staubwasser;Virgil Drăgușin;Bogdan P. Onac;Bogdan P. Onac;Sergey Assonov;Sergey Assonov

  • Rapid ecosystem response to abrupt climate changes during the last glacial period in western Europe, 40–16 ka

    Barbara Wohlfarth;Daniel Veres;Linda Ampel;Terri Lacourse

  • Origin of the forest steppe and exceptional grassland diversity in Transylvania (central-eastern Europe)

    Angelica Feurdean;Elena Marinova;Anne Birgitte Nielsen;Johan Liakka

  • The ELSA-Vegetation-Stack: reconstruction of Landscape Evolution Zones (LEZ) from laminated Eifel maar sediments of the last 60,000 years

    Frank Sirocko;H. Knapp;F. Dreher;M. W. Förster

  • The Campanian Ignimbrite eruption: new data on volcanic ash dispersal and its potential impact on human evolution.

    Kathryn E. Fitzsimmons;Ulrich Hambach;Daniel Veres;Daniel Veres;Radu Iovita

  • Shift of large-scale atmospheric systems over Europe during late MIS 3 and implications for Modern Human dispersal

    Igor Obreht;Ulrich Hambach;Ulrich Hambach;Daniel Veres;Daniel Veres;Christian Zeeden

  • Approaches and challenges to the study of loess - Introduction to the LoessFest Special Issue

    Randall J. Schaetzl;E. Arthur Bettis;Onn Crouvi;Kathryn E. Fitzsimmons

  • Multi-proxy dating of Holocene maar lakes and Pleistocene dry maar sediments in the Eifel, Germany

    Frank Sirocko;Stephan Dietrich;Daniel Veres;Pieter M. Grootes

  • Tracing the influence of Mediterranean climate on Southeastern Europe during the past 350,000 years

    Igor Obreht;Christian Zeeden;Ulrich Hambach;Daniel Veres

  • Trends in biomass burning in the Carpathian region over the last 15,000 years

    Angelica Feurdean;Angelica Feurdean;Allan Spessa;Enikö K. Magyari;Katherine J. Willis;Katherine J. Willis

  • Were last glacial climate events simultaneous between Greenland and France? A quantitative comparison using non-tuned chronologies†

    Maarten Blaauw;Barbara Wohlfarth;J. Andres Christen;Linda Ampel

  • A critical reevaluation of palaeoclimate proxy records from loess in the Carpathian Basin

    Igor Obreht;Christian Zeeden;Christian Zeeden;Ulrich Hambach;Daniel Veres

  • Vegetation and environmental responses to climate forcing during the Last Glacial Maximum and deglaciation in the East Carpathians: attenuated response to maximum cooling and increased biomass burning

    E.K. Magyari;D. Veres;V. Wennrich;B. Wagner

  • Younger Dryas to mid-Holocene environmental history of the lowlands of NW Transylvania, Romania

    Angelica N Feurdean;Volker Mosbrugger;Bogdan P. Onac;Victor J. Polyak

  • Constraining Holocene hydrological changes in the Carpathian–Balkan region using speleothem δ 18 O and pollen-based temperature reconstructions

    Virgil Dragusin;Virgil Dragusin;Virgil Dragusin;Michael Staubwasser;Dirk L. Hoffmann;Vasile Ersek;Vasile Ersek

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulrich Hambach
Ulrich Hambach University of Bayreuth
Frank Lehmkuhl
Frank Lehmkuhl RWTH Aachen University
Slobodan B. Marković
Slobodan B. Marković University of Novi Sad
Barbara Wohlfarth
Barbara Wohlfarth Stockholm University
Frédéric Parrenin
Frédéric Parrenin Grenoble Alpes University
Bogdan P. Onac
Bogdan P. Onac University of South Florida
Eric W. Wolff
Eric W. Wolff University of Cambridge
Frank Preusser
Frank Preusser University of Freiburg
Emilie Capron
Emilie Capron Grenoble Alpes University
Anders Svensson
Anders Svensson University of Copenhagen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science opens up diverse career paths that often intersect with other disciplines, making interdisciplinary knowledge valuable. For students interested in creative and environmental communication, pursuing an online mfa can enhance storytelling skills crucial to raising awareness around earth science issues.

For those inclined towards organizational leadership within scientific institutions or environmental agencies, obtaining a master's in a complementary field like human resources can be advantageous. Consider programs recognized among the best online human resource management masters degree, which help in managing multidisciplinary teams efficiently.

Many students, including seniors, look for flexible and accelerated study options that fit their life stage and commitments. There are excellent one year degree programs for seniors that facilitate swift upskilling or career shifts relevant to earth sciences and sustainability careers.

Additionally, for those interested in integrating library science and information management with earth science research, pursuing an online mlis degree ala accredited can provide essential skills in data curation and access to scientific knowledge resources.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel Veres

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles