What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Climate change
- Paleontology
Daniel Veres mainly focuses on Physical geography, Glacial period, Ice core, Paleontology and Marine isotope stage.
His research in Physical geography intersects with topics in Peat, Bog, Biomass, Mediterranean climate and Tephra.
His Glacial period research incorporates themes from Drainage basin, Climate change, Oceanography and Vegetation.
His Ice core study combines topics in areas such as Chronology and Dome.
His work carried out in the field of Chronology brings together such families of science as Speleothem, Multi proxy, Before Present and Geomorphology.
Daniel Veres combines subjects such as Lithic technology and Paleoclimatology with his study of Paleontology.
His most cited work include:
- The Antarctic ice core chronology (AICC2012): an optimized multi-parameter and multi-site dating approach for the last 120 thousand years (274 citations)
- The Antarctic ice core chronology (AICC2012): an optimized multi-parameter and multi-site dating approach for the last 120 thousand years (274 citations)
- An optimized multi-proxy, multi-site Antarctic ice and gas orbital chronology (AICC2012): 120--800 ka (231 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Loess, Glacial period, Physical geography, Paleontology and Holocene.
His Loess research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Aeolian processes, Quartz, Pleistocene and Thermoluminescence dating.
His Glacial period study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Climatology and Climate change.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Paleoclimatology, Northern Hemisphere, Mediterranean climate, Biological dispersal and Last Glacial Maximum in addition to Physical geography.
Paleontology is closely attributed to Ice core in his study.
His Ice core research integrates issues from Marine isotope stage and Geomorphology.
He most often published in these fields:
- Loess (40.93%)
- Glacial period (31.63%)
- Physical geography (30.23%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Loess (40.93%)
- Glacial period (31.63%)
- Physical geography (30.23%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Daniel Veres spends much of his time researching Loess, Glacial period, Physical geography, Pleistocene and Paleontology.
His Loess research incorporates elements of Aeolian processes, Quaternary, Chronology and Thermoluminescence dating.
His Glacial period research focuses on Interglacial in particular.
His Physical geography research also works with subjects such as
- Atmospheric circulation most often made with reference to Northern Hemisphere,
- Ice core most often made with reference to Last Glacial Maximum.
The Pleistocene study combines topics in areas such as Chronostratigraphy and Holocene.
His study in Paleontology focuses on Stadial in particular.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Impact of climate change on the transition of Neanderthals to modern humans in Europe (49 citations)
- Approaches and challenges to the study of loess - Introduction to the LoessFest Special Issue (46 citations)
- Approaches and challenges to the study of loess - Introduction to the LoessFest Special Issue (46 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Paleontology
- Climate change
His primary areas of study are Loess, Glacial period, Pleistocene, Quaternary and Interglacial.
His Loess study introduces a deeper knowledge of Paleontology.
His studies in Glacial period integrate themes in fields like Geochemistry, Quartz, Physical geography and Holocene.
His work in the fields of Last Glacial Maximum overlaps with other areas such as Context.
His research investigates the connection between Optically stimulated luminescence and topics such as Marine isotope stage that intersect with problems in Chronology.
His Thermoluminescence dating research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Tephrochronology and Ice core.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
