World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
59
Citations
11193
World Ranking
3483
National Ranking
1679

Jeffrey Farr publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey Farr sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 82 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jeffrey Farr D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeffrey Farr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Database
  • Computer vision

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Electronic records, Computer hardware, Display device, Computer vision and Artificial intelligence. His work on Remote computer as part of his general Computer hardware study is frequently connected to User interface, Container and Time data, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science. His Display device research covers fields of interest such as Information retrieval, Rendering, Source data, Excavation and Geographic area.

His studies deal with areas such as Mode and Geographic coordinate system as well as Computer vision. His studies in Geographic coordinate system integrate themes in fields like Input device and Real-time computing. He combines subjects such as Orientation and Image with his study of Landmark.

His most cited work include:

  • Systems and methods for complex event processing of vehicle information and image information relating to a vehicle (265 citations)
  • Locating equipment communicatively coupled to or equipped with a mobile/portable device (171 citations)
  • Methods, apparatus and systems for generating searchable electronic records of underground facility locate and/or marking operations (163 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His primary scientific interests are in Computer hardware, Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Display device and Technician. In the subject of general Computer hardware, his work in Docking station is often linked to Time data, Location data and User interface, thereby combining diverse domains of study. His work in the fields of Artificial intelligence, such as Landmark, Tracking and Orientation, intersects with other areas such as Path and Line.

Throughout his Display device studies, Jeffrey Farr incorporates elements of other sciences such as Excavation, Computer graphics, Digital image, Source data and Electronic records. In general Computer graphics study, his work on Rendering often relates to the realm of Graphical user interface, thereby connecting several areas of interest. In his study, Quality, Quality assessment and Transport engineering is strongly linked to Database, which falls under the umbrella field of Ticket.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Computer hardware (21.28%)
  • Artificial intelligence (20.57%)
  • Computer vision (20.57%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2017)?

  • Ticket (14.18%)
  • World Wide Web (8.51%)
  • Excavation (15.60%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Ticket, World Wide Web, Excavation, Computer vision and Artificial intelligence are his primary areas of study. His Ticket study which covers Database that intersects with Human–computer interaction. World Wide Web is connected with Technician and Electronic records in his study.

His Excavation investigation overlaps with other disciplines such as Geographic area and Display device. His study in Computer vision concentrates on Tracking and Landmark. His study looks at the intersection of Remote computer and topics like Data mining with Quality assessment and Quality.

Between 2012 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Methods and apparatus for overlaying electronic locate information on facilities map information and/or other image information displayed on a locate device (144 citations)
  • Systems, methods, and apparatus for tracking an object (22 citations)
  • Methods and apparatus for generating output data streams relating to underground utility marking operations (19 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Database
  • Computer vision

His scientific interests lie mostly in Computer hardware, Set, Work site, Artificial intelligence and Computer vision. His work on Remote computer as part of general Computer hardware study is frequently linked to Barcode, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. His Set study overlaps with Data stream mining, Network packet, Electronic records, Image processing and Tracking.

Among his Work site studies, you can observe a synthesis of other disciplines of science such as Zoom, Landmark, World Wide Web, Technician and Ticket. His work in the fields of Artificial intelligence, such as Orientation, Image and Object, overlaps with other areas such as Overlay and Heading. Optical flow and Inertial measurement unit are the primary areas of interest in his Computer vision study.

Best Publications

  • Methods, apparatus and systems for generating accuracy-annotated searchable electronic records of underground facility locate and/or marking operations

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Greg Block

  • Systems and methods for complex event processing of vehicle information and image information relating to a vehicle

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods, apparatus, and systems for documenting and reporting events via geo-referenced electronic drawings

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Systems and methods for complex event processing based on a hierarchical arrangement of complex event processing engines

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Locating equipment communicatively coupled to or equipped with a mobile/portable device

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Tony Davani

  • Marking device docking stations and methods of using same

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Marking apparatus having environmental sensors and operations sensors for underground facility marking operations, and associated methods and systems

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for overlaying electronic locate information on facilities map information and/or other image information displayed on a locate device

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for generating electronic records of locate operations

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Searchable electronic records of underground facility locate marking operations

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Virtual white lines for indicating planned excavation sites on electronic images

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Optical sensing methods and apparatus for detecting a color of a marking substance

    Steven Nielsen;Jeffrey Farr;Curtis Chambers

  • Marking apparatus having enhanced features for underground facility marking operations, and associated methods and systems

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Marking system and method with location and/or time tracking

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Mark A Conner

  • Methods and apparatus for generating an electronic record of environmental landmarks based on marking device actuations

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Locate apparatus having enhanced features for underground facility locate operations, and associated methods and systems

    Steven E Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for quality assessment of a field service operation based on geographic information

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;David Pennington;Jeffrey Farr

  • Marking system and method

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Rene A. Vazquez

  • Methods, apparatus, and systems for generating electronic records of locate and marking operations, and combined locate and marking apparatus for same

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Marking system, marking apparatus, marking tool, and marking method with location and/or time tracking

    Nielsen Steven;Chambers Curtis;Farr Jeffrey;Conner Mark A

Frequent Co-Authors

Curtis Chambers
Curtis Chambers Nielsen (United States)
Steven Nielsen
Steven Nielsen Nielsen (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology evolves, so do the opportunities for advancing your career in computer science. Choosing one of the best degrees for the future can open doors to high-demand and high-paying jobs in tech fields.

For those looking to advance their education quickly, there are many short masters programs available online. These accelerated degrees can help you upskill or shift your career focus with minimal disruption or time commitment.

If you are interested in research or academia, exploring cheap phd programs online can provide a pathway to earning a doctoral degree without the high cost of traditional programs.

Lastly, education professionals may find value in easiest edd programs that offer flexible and fast routes to a Doctor of Education degree, which is valued in educational leadership roles.

Exploring these online degree options can greatly expand your qualifications, enhance your job prospects, and help shape a rewarding long-term career in the ever-changing tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Jeffrey Farr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles