World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 63 2809 2726 1387 1336 86 11846

Curtis Chambers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Curtis Chambers between 2008 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Curtis Chambers published across 10 years, from 2008 to 2017, averaging 11.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 53 publications in 2010. 2 of the 117 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 53. Peak 53 publications in 2010. 2008: 5 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 53 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication
2008 2017

117 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Curtis Chambers: publications per year, 2008 to 2017
Year Publications
2008 5
2009 22
2010 53
2011 14
2012 4
2013 4
2014 7
2015 6
2016 1
2017 1
Total 117
Download as CSV

Curtis Chambers publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Curtis Chambers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 82–91 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 86 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324 86
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Curtis Chambers D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Curtis Chambers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308 63
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Database
  • Computer vision

His primary areas of investigation include Computer hardware, Electronic records, Display device, Artificial intelligence and Computer vision. His study on Remote computer and Docking station is often connected to User interface and Container as part of broader study in Computer hardware. Information retrieval, Rendering, Source data, Excavation and Geographic area are fields of study that overlap with his Display device research.

The Artificial intelligence study combines topics in areas such as Mode and Geographic coordinate system. His studies in Geographic coordinate system integrate themes in fields like Input device and Real-time computing. His work carried out in the field of Landmark brings together such families of science as Orientation and Image.

His most cited work include:

  • Systems and methods for complex event processing of vehicle information and image information relating to a vehicle (265 citations)
  • Locating equipment communicatively coupled to or equipped with a mobile/portable device (171 citations)
  • Methods, apparatus and systems for generating searchable electronic records of underground facility locate and/or marking operations (163 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Computer hardware, Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Technician and Ticket. His work on Docking station as part of general Computer hardware study is frequently linked to Time data, Location data and User interface, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. In general Artificial intelligence, his work in Landmark, Tracking and Orientation is often linked to Display device and Excavation linking many areas of study.

His Computer vision study spans across into subjects like Path and Line. His Ticket study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Field, Database and World Wide Web. His Database research includes themes of Quality, Quality assessment and Transport engineering.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Computer hardware (19.48%)
  • Artificial intelligence (19.48%)
  • Computer vision (19.48%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2017)?

  • Ticket (17.53%)
  • Excavation (16.23%)
  • Computer vision (19.48%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Ticket, Excavation, Computer vision, Artificial intelligence and World Wide Web. His study in Ticket is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Quality assessment and Database. The various areas that Curtis Chambers examines in his Quality assessment study include Field, Transport engineering and Human–computer interaction.

Excavation is integrated with Geographic area and Display device in his research. Curtis Chambers is involved in the study of Computer vision that focuses on Tracking in particular. His work on Metadata as part of his general World Wide Web study is frequently connected to Electronic records and Positive response, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

Between 2012 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Methods and apparatus for overlaying electronic locate information on facilities map information and/or other image information displayed on a locate device (144 citations)
  • Electronic manifest of underground facility locate marks (124 citations)
  • Systems, methods, and apparatus for tracking an object (22 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Database
  • Computer vision

Curtis Chambers mostly deals with Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Computer hardware, Geographic area and Set. His study in the field of Landmark, Orientation and Image is also linked to topics like Zoom and Overlay. His Object, Inertial measurement unit and Optical flow study in the realm of Computer vision connects with subjects such as Heading and Work site.

His study in the fields of Remote computer under the domain of Computer hardware overlaps with other disciplines such as Barcode. His study in Geographic area intersects with areas of studies such as Aerial image, Location, Cartography, Display device and Computer graphics. Among his research on Set, you can see a combination of other fields of science like Data stream mining, Network packet, Electronic records, Image processing and Tracking.

Best Publications

  • Methods, apparatus and systems for generating accuracy-annotated searchable electronic records of underground facility locate and/or marking operations

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Greg Block

  • Systems and methods for complex event processing of vehicle information and image information relating to a vehicle

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods, apparatus, and systems for documenting and reporting events via geo-referenced electronic drawings

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Systems and methods for complex event processing based on a hierarchical arrangement of complex event processing engines

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Locating equipment communicatively coupled to or equipped with a mobile/portable device

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Tony Davani

  • Marking device docking stations and methods of using same

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Marking apparatus having environmental sensors and operations sensors for underground facility marking operations, and associated methods and systems

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for overlaying electronic locate information on facilities map information and/or other image information displayed on a locate device

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for generating electronic records of locate operations

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Searchable electronic records of underground facility locate marking operations

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Virtual white lines for indicating planned excavation sites on electronic images

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Optical sensing methods and apparatus for detecting a color of a marking substance

    Steven Nielsen;Jeffrey Farr;Curtis Chambers

  • Marking apparatus having enhanced features for underground facility marking operations, and associated methods and systems

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Marking system and method with location and/or time tracking

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Mark A Conner

  • Methods and apparatus for generating an electronic record of environmental landmarks based on marking device actuations

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Locate apparatus having enhanced features for underground facility locate operations, and associated methods and systems

    Steven E Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for quality assessment of a field service operation based on geographic information

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;David Pennington;Jeffrey Farr

  • Marking system and method

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Rene A. Vazquez

  • Methods, apparatus, and systems for generating electronic records of locate and marking operations, and combined locate and marking apparatus for same

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for displaying and processing facilities map information and/or other image information on a marking device

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey Farr
Jeffrey Farr Nielsen (United States)
Steven Nielsen
Steven Nielsen Nielsen (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in computer science, you have a variety of online degree and certification options to fast-track your entry into the workforce or advance your career. Many students start with online associate degree programs, which offer foundational skills and can often be completed in just two years.

For those seeking speedier qualifications, there are numerous quick certifications that pay well, particularly in areas like cybersecurity, IT support, and software development. These can boost your employability and income without a lengthy commitment.

Advanced learners interested in further specialization may look into the quickest cheapest masters degree programs, which balance affordability and accelerated formats to help you upskill on your schedule.

When planning your educational path, it’s helpful to focus on which master's degree is most in demand in usa, ensuring your qualifications match current job market needs in computer science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Curtis Chambers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles