World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
63
Citations
11846
World Ranking
2809
National Ranking
1387

Curtis Chambers publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Curtis Chambers sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 86 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Curtis Chambers D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Curtis Chambers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Database
  • Computer vision

His primary areas of investigation include Computer hardware, Electronic records, Display device, Artificial intelligence and Computer vision. His study on Remote computer and Docking station is often connected to User interface and Container as part of broader study in Computer hardware. Information retrieval, Rendering, Source data, Excavation and Geographic area are fields of study that overlap with his Display device research.

The Artificial intelligence study combines topics in areas such as Mode and Geographic coordinate system. His studies in Geographic coordinate system integrate themes in fields like Input device and Real-time computing. His work carried out in the field of Landmark brings together such families of science as Orientation and Image.

His most cited work include:

  • Systems and methods for complex event processing of vehicle information and image information relating to a vehicle (265 citations)
  • Locating equipment communicatively coupled to or equipped with a mobile/portable device (171 citations)
  • Methods, apparatus and systems for generating searchable electronic records of underground facility locate and/or marking operations (163 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Computer hardware, Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Technician and Ticket. His work on Docking station as part of general Computer hardware study is frequently linked to Time data, Location data and User interface, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science. In general Artificial intelligence, his work in Landmark, Tracking and Orientation is often linked to Display device and Excavation linking many areas of study.

His Computer vision study spans across into subjects like Path and Line. His Ticket study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Field, Database and World Wide Web. His Database research includes themes of Quality, Quality assessment and Transport engineering.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Computer hardware (19.48%)
  • Artificial intelligence (19.48%)
  • Computer vision (19.48%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2017)?

  • Ticket (17.53%)
  • Excavation (16.23%)
  • Computer vision (19.48%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Ticket, Excavation, Computer vision, Artificial intelligence and World Wide Web. His study in Ticket is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Quality assessment and Database. The various areas that Curtis Chambers examines in his Quality assessment study include Field, Transport engineering and Human–computer interaction.

Excavation is integrated with Geographic area and Display device in his research. Curtis Chambers is involved in the study of Computer vision that focuses on Tracking in particular. His work on Metadata as part of his general World Wide Web study is frequently connected to Electronic records and Positive response, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

Between 2012 and 2017, his most popular works were:

  • Methods and apparatus for overlaying electronic locate information on facilities map information and/or other image information displayed on a locate device (144 citations)
  • Electronic manifest of underground facility locate marks (124 citations)
  • Systems, methods, and apparatus for tracking an object (22 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Artificial intelligence
  • Database
  • Computer vision

Curtis Chambers mostly deals with Artificial intelligence, Computer vision, Computer hardware, Geographic area and Set. His study in the field of Landmark, Orientation and Image is also linked to topics like Zoom and Overlay. His Object, Inertial measurement unit and Optical flow study in the realm of Computer vision connects with subjects such as Heading and Work site.

His study in the fields of Remote computer under the domain of Computer hardware overlaps with other disciplines such as Barcode. His study in Geographic area intersects with areas of studies such as Aerial image, Location, Cartography, Display device and Computer graphics. Among his research on Set, you can see a combination of other fields of science like Data stream mining, Network packet, Electronic records, Image processing and Tracking.

Best Publications

  • Methods, apparatus and systems for generating accuracy-annotated searchable electronic records of underground facility locate and/or marking operations

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Greg Block

  • Systems and methods for complex event processing of vehicle information and image information relating to a vehicle

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods, apparatus, and systems for documenting and reporting events via geo-referenced electronic drawings

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Systems and methods for complex event processing based on a hierarchical arrangement of complex event processing engines

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Locating equipment communicatively coupled to or equipped with a mobile/portable device

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Tony Davani

  • Marking device docking stations and methods of using same

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Marking apparatus having environmental sensors and operations sensors for underground facility marking operations, and associated methods and systems

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for overlaying electronic locate information on facilities map information and/or other image information displayed on a locate device

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for generating electronic records of locate operations

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Searchable electronic records of underground facility locate marking operations

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Virtual white lines for indicating planned excavation sites on electronic images

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Optical sensing methods and apparatus for detecting a color of a marking substance

    Steven Nielsen;Jeffrey Farr;Curtis Chambers

  • Marking apparatus having enhanced features for underground facility marking operations, and associated methods and systems

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Marking system and method with location and/or time tracking

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Mark A Conner

  • Methods and apparatus for generating an electronic record of environmental landmarks based on marking device actuations

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Locate apparatus having enhanced features for underground facility locate operations, and associated methods and systems

    Steven E Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for quality assessment of a field service operation based on geographic information

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;David Pennington;Jeffrey Farr

  • Marking system and method

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr;Rene A. Vazquez

  • Methods, apparatus, and systems for generating electronic records of locate and marking operations, and combined locate and marking apparatus for same

    Steven E. Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

  • Methods and apparatus for displaying and processing facilities map information and/or other image information on a marking device

    Steven Nielsen;Curtis Chambers;Jeffrey Farr

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey Farr
Jeffrey Farr Nielsen (United States)
Steven Nielsen
Steven Nielsen Nielsen (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in computer science, you have a variety of online degree and certification options to fast-track your entry into the workforce or advance your career. Many students start with online associate degree programs, which offer foundational skills and can often be completed in just two years.

For those seeking speedier qualifications, there are numerous quick certifications that pay well, particularly in areas like cybersecurity, IT support, and software development. These can boost your employability and income without a lengthy commitment.

Advanced learners interested in further specialization may look into the quickest cheapest masters degree programs, which balance affordability and accelerated formats to help you upskill on your schedule.

When planning your educational path, it’s helpful to focus on which master's degree is most in demand in usa, ensuring your qualifications match current job market needs in computer science and related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Curtis Chambers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles