World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
5797
World Ranking
7987
National Ranking
4273

Karen E. Diamond publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen E. Diamond sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 76 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Karen E. Diamond D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karen E. Diamond sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karen E. Diamond is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on Social Sciences with a specialized subfield in Education. The principal topic addressed in their work is Education Systems and Policy.

The scientist has contributed to academic literature through recent publication efforts. One notable paper is titled Examining different forms of implementation and in early childhood curriculum research, published in 2020 through UNC Libraries.

Key co-authors collaborating with Karen E. Diamond include:

  • Samuel L. Odom
  • Kandace Fleming
  • Joan Lieber
  • Marci J. Hanson
  • Gretchen Butera

Their work has been published in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries

The concentration on Education Systems and Policy emerges from the examination of curriculum implementation methodologies, reflecting the intersection of education and social science frameworks. This focus highlights an emphasis on how educational systems operate and influence early childhood education practices.

Best Publications

  • Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from Correlational Research for Evidence-Based Practice

    Bruce Thompson;Karen E. Diamond;Robin McWilliam;Patricia Snyder

  • Effects of an early literacy professional development intervention on head start teachers and children.

    Douglas R. Powell;Karen E. Diamond;Margaret R. Burchinal;Matthew J. Koehler

  • Inclusion of young children with special needs in early childhood education: The research base

    Samuel L. Odom;Karen E. Diamond

  • Development in early literacy skills during the pre-kindergarten year in Head Start: Relations between growth in children's writing and understanding of letters

    Karen E. Diamond;Hope K. Gerde;Douglas R. Powell

  • The Role of Parental Report in the Screening and Assessment of Young Children

    Karen E. Diamond;Jane Squires

  • Synthesis of IES Research on Early Intervention and Early Childhood Education. NCSER 2013-3001.

    Karen E. Diamond;Laura M. Justice;Robert S. Siegler;Patricia A. Snyder

  • Two approaches to teaching young children science concepts, vocabulary, and scientific problem-solving skills

    Soo Young Hong;Karen E. Diamond

  • Parents' Conceptions of Kindergarten Readiness: Relationships With Race, Ethnicity, and Development

    Karen E. Diamond;A. M. Y. J. Reagan;Jennifer E. Bandyk

  • Preschool Children's Conceptions of Disabilities: The Salience of Disability in Children's Ideas About Others

    Karen E. Diamond;Linda L. Hestenes

  • An Iterative Approach to the Development of a Professional Development Intervention for Head Start Teachers.

    Karen E. Diamond;Douglas R. Powell

  • Factors That Influence the Implementation of a New Preschool Curriculum: Implications for Professional Development

    Joan Lieber;Gretchen Butera;Marci Hanson;Susan Palmer

  • Young Children's Decisions to Include Peers With Physical Disabilities in Play

    Karen E. Diamond;Soo Young Hong

  • Neighborhood Socioeconomic Well-Being, Home Literacy, and Early Literacy Skills of At-Risk Preschoolers.

    John Mark Froiland;Douglas R. Powell;Karen E. Diamond;Seung-Hee Claire Son

  • Relationships between Enrollment in an Inclusive Class and Preschool Children's Ideas about People with Disabilities.

    Karen E. Diamond;Linda L. Hestenes;Ellen S. Carpenter;Fiona K. Innes

  • Examining Different Forms of Implementation and in Early Childhood Curriculum Research.

    Samuel L. Odom;Kandace Fleming;Karen Diamond;Joan Lieber

  • Correlates of young children's interactions with classmates with disabilities

    Lynn Okagaki;Karen E. Diamond;Susan J. Kontos;Linda L. Hestenes

  • Links Among Home Literacy Environment, Literacy Interest, and Emergent Literacy Skills in Preschoolers At Risk for Reading Difficulties:

    Alison E. Baroody;Karen E. Diamond

  • Relationships Among Young Children's Ideas, Emotional Understanding, and Social Contact with Classmates with Disabilities:

    Karen E. Diamond

  • Language intervention research in early childhood care and education: A systematic survey of the literature

    Dale Walker;Samantha J. Sepulveda;Erika Hoff;Meredith L. Rowe

  • Neighborhood Community Risk Influences on Preschool Children's Development and School Readiness.

    Marci J. Hanson;Angela D. Miller;Karen Diamond;Samuel Odom

  • Relations between classroom context, physical disability and preschool children's inclusion decisions

    Karen Diamond;Huifang Tu

Frequent Co-Authors

Samuel L. Odom
Samuel L. Odom University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Susan B. Palmer
Susan B. Palmer University of Kansas
Patricia Snyder
Patricia Snyder University of Florida
Matthew J. Koehler
Matthew J. Koehler Michigan State University
Janet Marquis
Janet Marquis University of Kansas
Philip S. Dale
Philip S. Dale University of New Mexico
Ilene S. Schwartz
Ilene S. Schwartz University of Washington
Susan C. Levine
Susan C. Levine University of Chicago
Bruce Thompson
Bruce Thompson Texas A&M University
Susan Goldin-Meadow
Susan Goldin-Meadow University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up diverse pathways, with counseling and mental health specialties in high demand. Many students seek online degrees as a flexible, affordable option to launch or advance their careers. However, with so many choices, it’s important to compare tuition costs, program accreditation, and alignment with your career goals.

Prospective counselors can benefit from researching affordable counseling programs in Los Angeles, especially if they plan to work in urban or culturally diverse environments. For those in the Midwest, learning about the cheapest counseling programs in Michigan offers valuable information on balancing cost and program quality.

If you are looking in the upper Midwest, researching affordable counseling degrees in Minnesota may help you find flexible, accredited online programs. Additionally, the cheapest counseling degrees in Nashville can be a smart choice for those interested in the Southeast region or online study.

With the right program, graduates can pursue roles such as clinical counselors, school psychologists, or specialized therapists, supporting individuals and communities in need.

Best Scientists Citing Karen E. Diamond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles