World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8440 7881 4514 4109 76 8828

Janet Marquis publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet Marquis between 1992 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet Marquis published across 28 years, from 1992 to 2019, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2002. 1 of the 80 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2002. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 3 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1992 2019

80 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet Marquis: publications per year, 1992 to 2019
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 1
1994 2
1995 1
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 4
2000 5
2001 5
2002 12
2003 5
2004 4
2005 6
2006 3
2007 1
2008 2
2009 5
2010 2
2011 1
2012 3
2013 4
2014 2
2015 1
2016 1
2017 2
2018 0
2019 1
Total 80
Download as CSV

Janet Marquis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Marquis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 76 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461 76
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet Marquis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet Marquis sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Janet Marquis is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the social sciences, with a specific emphasis on education and education systems and policy.

The scientist has contributed to the academic discourse through their publication titled Examining different forms of implementation and in early childhood curriculum research, published in 2020 by UNC Libraries.

Their network of frequent co-authors includes:

  • Samuel L. Odom
  • Kandace Fleming
  • Karen E. Diamond
  • Joan Lieber
  • Marci J. Hanson

The main fields of study in their work are:

  • Social Sciences

The subfield concentration is in:

  • Education

The principal topic addressed in their work is:

  • Education Systems and Policy

Janet Marquis has published in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • Assessing Family Outcomes: Psychometric Evaluation of the Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale

    Lesa Hoffman;Janet Marquis;Denise Poston;Jean Ann Summers

  • Family Quality of Life: A Qualitative Inquiry

    Denise J. Poston;Ann P. Turnbull;Jiyeon Park;Hasheem Mannan

  • Toward assessing family outcomes of service delivery: validation of a family quality of life survey

    Jiyeon Park;L. Hoffman;J. Marquis;A. P. Turnbull

  • Positive Behavior Support for People with Developmental Disabilities: A Research Synthesis

    Edward G. Carr;Robert H. Horner;Ann P. Turnbull;Janet G. Marquis

  • Frequency of input effects on word comprehension of children with specific language impairment.

    Mabel L. Rice;Janna B. Oetting;Janet Marquis;John Bode

  • Conceptualizing and measuring family quality of life.

    Jean Ann Summers;D. J. Poston;A. P. Turnbull;J. Marquis

  • Longitudinal change in language production: effects of aging and dementia on grammatical complexity and propositional content.

    Susan Kemper;Marilyn Thompson;Janet Marquis

  • Relationship of Perceived Adequacy of Services, Family–Professional Partnerships, and Family Quality of Life in Early Childhood Service Programmes

    Jean Ann Summers;Janet Marquis;Hasheem Mannan;Ann P. Turnbull

  • Measuring the Quality of Family—Professional Partnerships in Special Education Services:

    Jean Ann Summers;Lesa Hoffman;Janet Marquis;Ann P. Turnbull

  • A Qualitative Study of Parent to Parent Support for Parents of Children With Special Needs

    Judith G. Ainbinder;Lynn W. Blanchard;George H. S. Singer;Mary Ellen Sullivan

  • A Multi-site Evaluation of Parent to Parent Programs for Parents of Children With Disabilities

    George H. S. Singer;Janet Marquis;Laurie K. Powers;Lynn Blanchard

  • Grammatical tense deficits in children with SLI and nonspecific language impairment: relationships with nonverbal IQ over time.

    Mabel L. Rice;J. Bruce Tomblin;Lesa Hoffman;W. Allen Richman

  • Language decline across the life span: findings from the Nun Study.

    Susan Kemper;Lydia H. Greiner;Janet G. Marquis;Katherine Prenovost

  • Maternal responsivity predicts language development in young children with fragile X syndrome.

    Steven F. Warren;Nancy C. Brady;Audra Sterling;Kandace Fleming

  • Prelinguistic predictors of language growth in children with developmental disabilities.

    Nancy C. Brady;Janet Marquis;Kandace Fleming;Lee McLean

  • What Is the Reading Component Skill Profile of Adolescent Struggling Readers in Urban Schools

    Michael F. Hock;Irma F. Brasseur;Donald D. Deshler;Hugh W. Catts

  • The acquisition of tense in English: Distinguishing child second language from first language and specific language impairment

    Johanne Paradis;Mabel L. Rice;Martha Crago;Janet G. Marquis

  • Effect of the number of scale points on chi‐square fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis

    Samuel B. Green;Theresa M. Akey;Kandace K. Fleming;Scott L. Hershberger

  • Relationship Between Parent Satisfaction Regarding Partnerships With Professionals and Age of Child

    Jean Ann Summers;Lesa Hoffman;Janet Marquis;Ann Turnbull

  • Acquisition of irregular past tense by children with specific language impairment.

    Mabel L. Rice;Kenneth Wexler;Janet Marquis;Scott Hershberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Ann P. Turnbull
Ann P. Turnbull University of Kansas
Jean B. Schumaker
Jean B. Schumaker University of Kansas
Donald D. Deshler
Donald D. Deshler University of Kansas
Lesa Hoffman
Lesa Hoffman University of Iowa
Jean Ann Summers
Jean Ann Summers University of Kansas
Nancy C. Brady
Nancy C. Brady University of Kansas
Hasheem Mannan
Hasheem Mannan University College Dublin
Mabel L. Rice
Mabel L. Rice University of Kansas
Susan Kemper
Susan Kemper University of Kansas
Peter D. Friedmann
Peter D. Friedmann University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online degrees in psychology open the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways, particularly in counseling and therapy. One popular direction is becoming a Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), a role that is in demand across the United States. Each state and city often has specific licensure and education requirements, so it’s important to understand the local standards before choosing your academic path.

For example, you can learn how to become an mft in Louisville or explore how to become an mft in Lubbock if you plan to work in Texas. Those interested in Wisconsin can review mft requirements in Madison, while aspiring therapists in Tennessee should check the mft requirements in Memphis.

Understanding these regional nuances helps prospective students select the right accredited online programs and prepares them for fulfilling roles as therapists, counselors, and mental health advocates nationwide.

Best Scientists Citing Janet Marquis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles