World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
127
Citations
62494
World Ranking
193
National Ranking
120

John R. Weisz publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Weisz sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 497 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

John R. Weisz D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John R. Weisz sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 127 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award, Association for Psychological Science
  • 1989 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)
  • 1983 - Review of Research Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

John R. Weisz is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Psychology, with a particular focus on Clinical Psychology. Their research portfolio includes 232 publications primarily centered on child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, digital mental health interventions, and mental health treatment and access.

Their recent research contributions include the following papers:

  • Psychotherapy for Depression Across Different Age Groups: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis, 2020, JAMA Psychiatry
  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychotherapies, and their combination for acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis, 2020, The Lancet Psychiatry
  • Single-session digital intervention for adolescent depression, anxiety, and well-being: Outcomes of a randomized controlled trial with Kenyan adolescents., 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Meta-analysis: Are Psychotherapies Less Effective for Black Youth in Communities With Higher Levels of Anti-Black Racism?, 2021, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • The effects of psychological treatments of depression in children and adolescents on response, reliable change, and deterioration: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Katherine E. Venturo-Conerly (35 publications)
  • Tom L. Osborn (29 publications)
  • Akash R. Wasil (26 publications)
  • Olivia M. Fitzpatrick (21 publications)
  • Christine Wasanga (15 publications)

The principal publication venues where John R. Weisz's work appears are:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (13 publications)
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (10 publications)
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (8 publications)
  • Behavior Therapy (5 publications)
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development (4 publications)

Their subfields of study include Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, and Education.

The main topical areas addressed in their work cover:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

John R. Weisz's career includes recognition through awards such as the James McKeen Cattell Fellow Award from the Association for Psychological Science (2013), Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) since 1989, and the Review of Research Award from the American Educational Research Association (1983).

Best Publications

  • Changing the world and changing the self: A two-process model of perceived control.

    Fred Rothbaum;John R. Weisz;Samuel S. Snyder

  • Examining the association between parenting and childhood anxiety: a meta-analysis.

    Bryce D. McLeod;Jeffrey J. Wood;John R. Weisz

  • Parental caregiving and child externalizing behavior in nonclinical samples: A meta-analysis.

    Fred Rothbaum;John R. Weisz

  • Evidence-based psychotherapies for children and adolescents

    Alan E. Kazdin;John R. Weisz

  • Standing out and standing in: The psychology of control in America and Japan.

    John R. Weisz;Fred M. Rothbaum;Thomas C. Blackburn

  • Effects of psychotherapy with children and adolescents revisited: a meta-analysis of treatment outcome studies.

    John R. Weisz;Bahr Weiss;Susan S. Han;Douglas A. Granger

  • Effects of psychotherapy for depression in children and adolescents: a meta-analysis.

    John R. Weisz;Carolyn A. McCarty;Sylvia M. Valeri

  • Identifying and developing empirically supported child and adolescent treatments

    Alan E. Kazdin;John R. Weisz

  • How to feel better when it feels bad: Children's perspectives on coping with everyday stress

    Eve Brotman Band;John R. Weisz

  • Attachment and culture. Security in the United States and Japan.

    Fred Rothbaum;John Weisz;Martha Pott;Kazuo Miyake

  • Testing Standard and Modular Designs for Psychotherapy Treating Depression, Anxiety, and Conduct Problems in Youth: A Randomized Effectiveness Trial

    John R Weisz;Bruce F. Chorpita;Lawrence A. Palinkas;Sonia K. Schoenwald

  • Examining the association between parenting and childhood depression: a meta-analysis.

    Bryce D. McLeod;John R. Weisz;Jeffrey J. Wood

  • Effectiveness of psychotherapy with children and adolescents: a meta-analysis for clinicians

    John R. Weisz;Bahr Weiss;Mark D. Alicke;M. L. Klotz

  • Bridging the Gap Between Laboratory and Clinic in Child and Adolescent Psychotherapy

    John R. Weisz;Geri R. Donenberg;Susan S. Han;Bahr Weiss

  • Identifying and selecting the common elements of evidence based interventions: a distillation and matching model.

    Bruce F. Chorpita;Eric L. Daleiden;John R. Weisz

  • Promoting and Protecting Youth Mental Health Through Evidence-Based Prevention and Treatment.

    John R. Weisz;Irwin N. Sandler;Joseph A. Durlak;Barry S. Anton

  • What five decades of research tells us about the effects of youth psychological therapy: A multilevel meta-analysis and implications for science and practice.

    John R. Weisz;Sofie Kuppens;Mei Yi Ng;Dikla Eckshtain

  • Evidence-based youth psychotherapies versus usual clinical care: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons.

    John R. Weisz;Amanda Jensen-Doss;Kristin M. Hawley

  • The Development of Close Relationships in Japan and the United States: Paths of Symbiotic Harmony and Generative Tension

    Fred Rothbaum;Martha Pott;Hiroshi Azuma;Kazuo Miyake

  • Perceived Personal Control and Academic Achievement

    Deborah J. Stipek;John R. Weisz

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruce F. Chorpita
Bruce F. Chorpita University of California, Los Angeles
Bahr Weiss
Bahr Weiss Vanderbilt University
Jessica L. Schleider
Jessica L. Schleider Northwestern University
Bryce D. McLeod
Bryce D. McLeod Virginia Commonwealth University
Michael A. Southam-Gerow
Michael A. Southam-Gerow Virginia Commonwealth University
Amanda Jensen-Doss
Amanda Jensen-Doss University of Miami
Philip C. Kendall
Philip C. Kendall Temple University
Carolyn A. McCarty
Carolyn A. McCarty Seattle Children's Hospital
Spencer C. Evans
Spencer C. Evans University of Miami
Pim Cuijpers
Pim Cuijpers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens numerous doors for both aspiring practitioners and those interested in specialized careers. One growing field is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), where becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) is a popular pathway. Each city and state may have unique education requirements and steps to certification.

For instance, understanding the local processes can help students interested in becoming a bcba in Irvine or those researching how to become a bcba in Irving. Similarly, there are specific guidelines for those considering how to become a bcba in Jacksonville, including tailored coursework and supervised experience.

Before enrolling in an online program, it’s vital to review local certification requirements, such as the Jersey City bcba education requirements. This ensures that your education aligns with your career goals and state licensing criteria. Ultimately, choosing the right online psychology degree can provide a solid foundation for a rewarding future in counseling, research, education, or therapy.

Best Scientists Citing John R. Weisz

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles