World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 61 3355 3090 1894 1705 246 15737

Rinad S. Beidas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rinad S. Beidas between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rinad S. Beidas published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 17.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 56 publications in 2021. 79 of the 399 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 56. Peak 56 publications in 2021. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 25 publications 2019: 34 publications 2020: 42 publications 2021: 56 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 32 publications 2024: 50 publications 2025: 29 publications
2003 2025

399 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rinad S. Beidas: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 1
2008 4
2009 3
2010 6
2011 6
2012 4
2013 9
2014 10
2015 15
2016 17
2017 19
2018 25
2019 34
2020 42
2021 56
2022 36
2023 32
2024 50
2025 29
Total 399
Download as CSV

Rinad S. Beidas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rinad S. Beidas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 241–250 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 246 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196 246
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Rinad S. Beidas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rinad S. Beidas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321 61
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Rinad S. Beidas is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Health Professions, Medicine, and Psychology. Their work spans several subfields including General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Social Psychology.

Their research focuses on topics such as Health Policy Implementation Science, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Mental Health and Patient Involvement, Community Health and Development, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Rinad S. Beidas include:

  • A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health (2020, Implementation Science)
  • Promises and pitfalls in implementation science from the perspective of US-based researchers: learning from a pre-mortem (2022, Implementation Science)
  • A pragmatic method for costing implementation strategies using time-driven activity-based costing (2020, Implementation Science)
  • Systematic review of clinician-directed nudges in healthcare contexts (2021, BMJ Open)
  • Testing a theory of strategic implementation leadership, implementation climate, and clinicians' use of evidence-based practice: a 5-year panel analysis (2020, Implementation Science)

Frequent co-authors working with Rinad S. Beidas include:

  • Alison M. Buttenheim
  • Nathaniel J. Williams
  • Courtney Benjamin Wolk
  • David S. Mandell
  • Emily M. Becker-Haimes

The most frequent venues where Rinad S. Beidas publishes research are:

  • Implementation Science
  • Implementation Science Communications
  • Psychiatric Services
  • Implementation Research and Practice
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Best Publications

  • Training Therapists in Evidence-Based Practice: A Critical Review of Studies From a Systems-Contextual Perspective.

    Rinad S. Beidas;Philip C. Kendall

  • Methods to Improve the Selection and Tailoring of Implementation Strategies.

    Byron J. Powell;Rinad S. Beidas;Cara C. Lewis;Gregory A. Aarons

  • Implementation Mapping: Using Intervention Mapping to Develop Implementation Strategies.

    Maria E. Fernandez;Gill A. ten Hoor;Sanne van Lieshout;Serena A. Rodriguez

  • Enhancing the Impact of Implementation Strategies in Healthcare: A Research Agenda.

    Byron J. Powell;Maria E. Fernandez;Nathaniel J. Williams;Gregory A. Aarons

  • Training and Consultation to Promote Implementation of an Empirically Supported Treatment: A Randomized Trial

    Rinad S. Beidas;Julie M. Edmunds;Steven C. Marcus;Philip C. Kendall

  • Smoothing the trail for dissemination of evidence-based practices for youth: Flexibility within fidelity.

    Philip C. Kendall;Rinad S. Beidas

  • A practical implementation science heuristic for organizational readiness: R = MC(2).

    Jonathan P. Scaccia;Brittany S. Cook;Andrea Lamont;Abraham Wandersman

  • A systematic review of empirical studies examining mechanisms of implementation in health

    Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Cara C. Lewis;Meredith R. Boyd;Callie Walsh-Bailey;Callie Walsh-Bailey;Aaron R. Lyon

  • The Relationship between Financial Strain, Perceived Stress, Psychological Symptoms, and Academic and Social Integration in Undergraduate Students.

    Danielle R. Adams;Steven A. Meyers;Rinad S. Beidas

  • Free, Brief, and Validated: Standardized Instruments for Low-Resource Mental Health Settings

    Rinad S. Beidas;Rebecca E. Stewart;Lucia Walsh;Steven Lucas

  • Dissemination and Implementation of Evidence–Based Practices: Training and Consultation as Implementation Strategies

    Julie M. Edmunds;Rinad S. Beidas;Philip C. Kendall

  • Annual Research Review: The state of implementation science in child psychology and psychiatry: a review and suggestions to advance the field.

    Nathaniel J. Williams;Rinad S. Beidas;Rinad S. Beidas

  • Consultation as an Implementation Strategy for Evidence-Based Practices Across Multiple Contexts: Unpacking the Black Box

    Erum Nadeem;Alissa Gleacher;Rinad S. Beidas

  • Show Me, Don't Tell Me: Behavioral Rehearsal as a Training and Analogue Fidelity Tool.

    Rinad S. Beidas;Wendi Cross;Shannon Dorsey

  • Predictors of community therapists' use of therapy techniques in a large public mental health system.

    Rinad S. Beidas;Steven Marcus;Gregory A. Aarons;Kimberly E. Hoagwood

  • The intolerance of uncertainty scale for children: a psychometric evaluation

    Jonathan S. Comer;Amy K. Roy;Jami M. Furr;Kristin Gotimer

  • Relationships between clinician-level attributes and fidelity-consistent and fidelity-inconsistent modifications to an evidence-based psychotherapy.

    Shannon Wiltsey Stirman;Cassidy A Gutner;Paul Crits-Christoph;Julie Edmunds

  • Proceedings from the 9th annual conference on the science of dissemination and implementation

    David Chambers;Lisa Simpson;Felicia Hill-Briggs;Gila Neta

  • A Prospective Examination of Clinician and Supervisor Turnover Within the Context of Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in a Publicly-Funded Mental Health System

    Rinad S. Beidas;Steven Marcus;Steven Marcus;Courtney Benjamin Wolk;Byron Powell;Byron Powell

  • Training Research: Practical Recommendations for Maximum Impact

    Rinad S. Beidas;Rinad S. Beidas;Kelly Koerner;Kenneth R. Weingardt;Philip C. Kendall

  • Stigma and sexual health risk in HIV-positive African American young men who have sex with men.

    Jerilynn Radcliffe;Nathan Doty;Linda A. Hawkins;Clare S. Gaskins

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Mandell
David S. Mandell University of Pennsylvania
Steven C. Marcus
Steven C. Marcus University of Pennsylvania
Philip C. Kendall
Philip C. Kendall Temple University
Gregory A. Aarons
Gregory A. Aarons University of California, San Diego
Frances K. Barg
Frances K. Barg University of Pennsylvania
Byron J. Powell
Byron J. Powell Washington University in St. Louis
Cara C. Lewis
Cara C. Lewis Kaiser Permanente
Trevor R. Hadley
Trevor R. Hadley University of Pennsylvania
Shannon Dorsey
Shannon Dorsey University of Washington
Jill Locke
Jill Locke University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology can open doors to rewarding careers in mental health, counseling, research, and social services. Many students also consider related fields, like Social Work, which offers a direct route to supporting individuals and communities in need.

If affordability is a key concern, there are several educational pathways to consider. For students based on the West Coast, the cheapest social work degrees in California provide cost-effective options with strong programs. In the Midwest, those searching for accessible degrees can explore the cheapest social work programs in Chicago or find affordable social work degrees in Columbus, each offering quality training for aspiring professionals.

Texas residents are not left out, as the cheapest social work programs in Denton offer accessible opportunities for starting a career in social services. These programs can complement or expand upon a foundation in Psychology, creating diverse and meaningful career pathways in healthcare, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Rinad S. Beidas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles